Law and Practice of International Arbitration in the CIS Region

The former Soviet republics of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) generate a significant and growing amount of work for the major Western and CIS regional international arbitral institutions.
This book, a country-by-country analysis of regulation and practice of international arbitration in ten CIS jurisdictions, offers the first comprehensive review of commercial arbitration in the region. It also analyses notable developments in the use of arbitration mechanisms contained in bilateral and multilateral investment treaties affecting the region.
The book provides not only a detailed analysis of the law, but also insight from local practitioners into the culture of arbitration and how the law is applied in each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions covered include Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.
In addition to detailed discussion of the particular features of arbitral practice in each jurisdiction, contributions cover the following issues and topics:

- arbitrability of disputes and public policy;

- arbitral procedure;

- recognition and enforcement of commercial and investor-state arbitration awards;

- implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law and other instruments affecting arbitral practice and procedure;

- statistics from key arbitration institutions;

- adherence to the ICSID, New York and key regional conventions relevant to arbitration;

- relevant regulations, cases as well as applicable bilateral investment treaties;

- law and practice related to investor-state arbitration; and

- role of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union.


An informative introductory chapter provides detailed discussion and analysis of historic and current trends affecting arbitration practice among the CIS countries, including the role of regional conventions relatively unknown in the West.
As a comprehensive overview of international arbitration in this burgeoning region, this book has no peers. It is sure to be highly valued and used by lawyers, arbitrators, and academics concerned with alternative dispute resolution, as well as by arbitration institutions, companies, states, and individuals engaged in arbitration.