Microbial Biotechnology

Name: Microbial Biotechnology | Role in Ecological Sustainability and Research
Brand: Wiley
Price: 173.99 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

Role in Ecological Sustainability and Research

Pankaj Chowdhary Sujata Mani Preeti Chaturvedi(Herausgeber*in)

Wiley (Verlag)

1. Auflage

Erschienen am 7. September 2022

496 Seiten

E-Book

ePUB mit Adobe-DRM

Systemvoraussetzungen

978-1-119-83447-2 (ISBN)

173,99 €inkl. 7% MwSt.

Systemvoraussetzungen

für ePUB mit Adobe-DRM

E-Book Einzellizenz

Als Download verfügbar

Beschreibung

Weitere Details

Weitere Ausgaben

Personen

Inhalt

Cover
Title Page
Copyright Page
Contents
CONTRIBUTORS
Preface
About the Editors
Part I Microorganism: An Introduction
Chapter 1 Microbes and Environment: Recent Advancement in Environmental Biotechnology
1.1. INTRODUCTION
1.2. MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENT
1.2.1. Bacteria (Archaea and Eubacteria)
1.2.2. Fungus
1.2.3. Algae
1.2.4. Protozoa
1.2.5. Viruses
1.3. MICROBIAL INVOLVEMENT IN ECOLOGICAL/ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
1.3.1. Remediation of Environmental Pollutants
1.3.2. Beneficial Microbes in Agriculture
1.3.3. Miscellaneous Microbial Applications
1.4. MODERNIZATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL/MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
1.4.1. Current Status and Scope of Microbial Biotechnology
1.5. PROS AND CONS OF MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
1.5.1. Pros of Microbial Biotechnology
1.5.2. Cons of Microbial Biotechnology
1.6. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTIVE
Conflicts of Interests
Acknowledgments
References
Chapter 2 Environmental and Industrial Applications of Biosurfactants
2.1. INTRODUCTION
2.2. BIOSURFACTANTS AND THEIR PROPERTIES
2.3. TYPES OF BIOSURFACTANTS
2.3.1. Glycolipids
2.3.2. Lipopeptides
2.3.3. Phospholipids and Fatty Acids
2.3.4. Polymeric Biosurfactants
2.4. APPLICATIONS OF BIOSURFACTANTS
2.4.1. In the Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Industries
2.4.2. In the Cosmetic Industry
2.4.3. In Bioremediation of Heavy Metals
2.5. CONCLUSIONS
References
Chapter 3 Synbiotic Effects of Human Milk on Neonatal Health: Probiotic Early Microflora and Prebiotic Oligosaccharides in Symphony
3.1. INTRODUCTION
3.2. SOURCES OF NUTRITION FOR INFANTS
3.2.1. Breastfeeding
3.2.2. Formula Milk for Infants
3.3. ROLE OF INTESTINAL MICROFLORA IN NEONATAL HEALTH
3.4. FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE NEONATAL MICROBIOME
3.5. NUTRITIVE ASPECTS OF BREASTMILK
3.5.1. Pre- and Probiotic Aspects of Human Milk
3.5.2. Role of Human Milk Flora in Neonatal Diseases
3.6. MICROBIOME EXCHANGE BETWEEN MOTHERS AND INFANTS IN THE INTRAUTERINE AND EXTRAUTERINE ENVIRONMENT
3.6.1. Microbial Population in the Intrauterine Environment
3.7. HUMAN MILK PROBIOTIC-BASED MILK FORMULA FOR INFANTS
3.8. FORTIFICATION OF INFANT FORMULA WITH SYNBIOTICS
3.9. CONCLUSION
Acknowledgements
References
Chapter 4 Metabolic Engineering of Microbes for the Production of Plant-Based Compounds
4.1. INTRODUCTION
4.2. METABOLIC ENGINEERING OF MICROBES
4.3. METABOLIC ENGINEERING OF MICROBES FOR PRIMARY METABOLITE PRODUCTION
4.4. METABOLIC ENGINEERING OF MICROBES FOR SECONDARY METABOLITES
4.4.1. Terpenoids Biosynthesis
4.4.2. Benzylisoquinoline Alkaloids (BIAs)
4.4.3. Coumarins
4.5. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND CONCLUSION
References
Chapter 5 Quorum Sensing and Environmental Sustainability
5.1. QUORUM SENSING - A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
5.2. CONCEPT AND MECHANISM IN QUORUM SENSING
5.3. QUORUM SENSING AND THE ENVIRONMENT
5.4. APPLICATIONS OF QUORUM SENSING
5.5. QUORUM SENSING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
5.6. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF QUORUM SENSING
5.7. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TOWARD ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
5.8. FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR QUORUM SENSING
5.9. CONCLUSION
References
Chapter 6 Endophytic Microbes: Potential Source of Antibiotic Production
6.1. INTRODUCTION
6.1.1 Definition
6.1.2. Origin and Evolution of Endophytes
6.2 ENDOPHYTIC MICROBES AND SECONDARY METABOLITES
6.2.1 Endophytes as a Source of Antibiotics
6.3 RATIONALE FOR PLANT SELECTION TO ISOLATE NOVEL ENDOPHYTIC MICROORGANISMS
6.3.1. Isolation and Cultivation of Endophytes
6.3.2. Screening for Antimicrobial Activity
6.3.3. Automated Turbidometric Assay
6.4 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE
References
Chapter 7 The Role and Importance of Microorganisms in Environmental Sustainability
7.1. INTRODUCTION
7.2. DEFINITIONS
7.3. BIOFERTILIZERS
7.4. BIOPESTICIDES
7.5. BIOHERBICIDES
7.6. BIOINSECTICIDES
7.7. EFFECTIVE MICROORGANISMS
7.7.1. Microorganisms in Biological Plant Protection
7.7.2. EM in Food Processing
7.7.3. EM in Composting
7.7.4. Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification and Aerobic Denitrifying Microorganisms (HNADM)
7.7.5. EM and Germanium in Sustainable Agriculture
7.7.6. EM in Livestock Production
7.8. MICROBIOLOGICAL ORGANISMS IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
7.9. PERSPECTIVES
7.10. CONCLUSIONS
References
Part II Environmental Management: Bioremediation through Nexus Approach
Chapter 8 Application of Green Remediation Technology in Field of Dye Effluent Management
8.1. INTRODUCTION
8.2. DYES AND THEIR HISTORY
8.2.1. Dye Classification
8.2.2. Class of Dyes Depending on the Source of Raw Material
8.2.3. Class of Dyes Depending upon the Method of Application
8.2.4. Class of Dyes Depending upon Chromophore Group
8.3. EFFECT OF TEXTILE DYES ON LIFEFORMS
8.4. TYPES OF TEXTILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT
8.4.1. Physicochemical Treatment
8.4.2. Biological Treatment
8.5. PLANT-BASED STRATEGIES FOR DYE REMEDIATION
8.5.1. Phytoremediation
8.5.2. Different Phytoremediation Strategies
8.5.3. Limitations of Phytoremediation
8.5.4. Selection of Effective Phytoremediator
8.6. PHYTOTRANSFORMATION OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILE DYES
8.7. ENZYME CASCADE RESPONSIBLE FOR DYE REMEDIATION
8.8. TOXICITY STUDIES OF TEXTILE DYES AND THEIR METABOLITES
8.8.1. Phytotoxicity
8.8.2. Aquatic Animal Toxicity
8.8.3. Genotoxicity
8.8.4. Cytotoxicity
8.9. PLANTS USED FOR THE TREATMENT OF TEXTILE WASTE
8.9.1. Asparagus Densiflorus
8.9.2. Ammannia Baccifera
8.9.3. Fimbristylis Dichotoma
8.9.4 Typha Angustifolia
8.9.5. Chrysopogon Zizanioides
8.10. CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS (CWS) AND THEIR TYPES
8.10.1. Free Water Surface CWs (FWS)
8.10.2 Subsurface Flow CWs (SSF)
8.10.3. Horizontal Subsurface Flow CWs (HSF)
8.10.4. Vertical Subsurface Flow CWs (VSF)
8.10.5. Hydroponic System
8.10.6. Static Hydroponic System (SHS)
8.10.7 Continuous Flow Hydroponic System (CFH)
8.10.8. Hybrid System
8.11. USE OF COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN THE FIELD OF DYE REMEDIATION
8.12. COUPLING OF THE PLANT-MICROBIAL FUEL CELL (P-MFC) TO INCREASE THE DYE DEGRADATION RATE WITH SIMULTANEOUS ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION
8.13. FIELD APPLICATION OF PHYTOREMEDIATION TO DEAL WITH REAL TEXTILE EFFLUENT
8.14. CONCLUDING NOTE
References
Chapter 9 Exploitation of Soil Amendments to Remediate Heavy Metal Toxicity for Safe Cultivation of Crops
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2. SOURCES OF HEAVY METAL LOAD IN THE SOIL SYSTEM
9.3. EFFECT OF METAL CONTAMINATION ON SOIL HEALTH
9.4. REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES FOR HEAVY METAL-CONTAMINATED SOIL
9.4.1. Organic Soil Amendments
9.4.2. Inorganic Soil Amendments
9.5. WAY FORWARD AND CONCLUSIONS
References
Chapter 10 Microbial Proteomics: Understanding Metabolic Pathways in Microorganisms for Bioremediation of Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollutants
10.1. INTRODUCTION
10.2. THE STUDY OF AROMATIC HYDROCARBON METABOLISM PATHWAYS - TRADITIONAL APPROACHES
10.3. A SHIFT TOWARD PROTEOMIC APPROACHES TO INVESTIGATE MICROBIAL AROMATIC HYDROCARBON METABOLISM
10.4. METABOLISM OF LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT (LMW) AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
10.5. METABOLISM OF HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT (HMW) POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAH)
10.6. CONCLUSION
Acknowledgement
References
Chapter 11 Bioremediation of Problematic Soil for Sustainability
11.1. INTRODUCTION
11.2. PROBLEMATIC SOIL: A GLOBAL COVERAGE
11.3. BIOREMEDIATION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
11.4. BIOREMEDIATION OF PROBLEMATIC SOILS: FACTS AND FAITH
11.5. MICROBIAL VS PLANT-ASSISTED BIOREMEDIATION
11.6. PLANTS FOR SOIL REMEDIATION
11.7. LEGUMINOUS TREES FOR REMEDIATION OF SALT-AFFECTED SOIL
11.8. MICROBES FOR SOIL REMEDIATION
11.9. BIOREMEDIATION OF HEAVY METAL IN SOIL
11.10. BIOREMEDIATION OF OIL-CONTAMINATED SOIL
11.11. SOIL REMEDIATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
11.12. EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN SOIL REMEDIATION
11.13. CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
11.14. POLICY AND FUTURE ROADMAP
11.15. CONCLUSIONS
References
Chapter 12 Recent Advances in Biosensors for Rapid Identification of Antibiotics in Dairy Products
12.1. INTRODUCTION
12.1.1. Use of Antibiotics and Associated Risks
12.1.2. Current State of Food Inspection
12.1.3. Conventional Testing Methods
12.2. BIOSENSORS FOR DETECTION OF ANTIBIOTICS IN FOOD
12.3. FUTURE PROSPECTS
12.4. CONCLUSION
Acknowledgments
References
Chapter 13 Application of Microbes in Dye Decolorization
13.1. INTRODUCTION
13.2. POLLUTION OF AZO DYES IN THE ENVIRONMENT
13.2.1. Toxic Effects of Azo Dyes
13.2.2. Azo Dye Effects on Human Systems
13.2.3. Azo Dye Effects on Animals
13.2.4. Azo Dye Effects on the Aquatic System
13.3. IMPORTANCE OF MICROBES IN THE ENVIRONMENT
13.3.1. Microbes in the Carbon Cycle
13.3.2. Microbes in Methane Production
13.3.3. Microbes in the Nitrogen Cycle
13.3.4. Microbes in the Sulfur Cycle
13.4. REMOVAL AND DEGRADATION OF AZO DYES
13.4.1. Decolorization of Azo Dyes by Bacteria
13.4.2. Decolorization of Azo Dyes by Fungus
13.5. CURRENT AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE
References
Chapter 14 Removal Potential of Microplastics in Organic Solid Wastes via Biological Treatment Approaches
14.1. INTRODUCTION
14.2. MICROPLASTICS IN TYPICAL ORGANIC WASTES
14.2.1. Sources, Types, and Abundances
14.3. ANALYTICAL METHODS OF MICROPLASTICS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
14.4. FATE OF MICROPLASTICS IN ORGANIC WASTES THROUGH BIOTREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
14.4.1. Composting
14.4.2. Anaerobic Digestion
14.4.3. Vermicomposting
14.5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
References
Chapter 15 Role of Microbes in Wastewater Treatment and Energy Generation Potentials: A Sustainable Approach
15.1. INTRODUCTION
15.2. WASTEWATER AND THEIR GENERATION SOURCE
15.2.1. Black Water (BW)
15.2.2. Gray Water (GW)
15.3. ADVANCEMENTS IN WWT TECHNOLOGIES
15.4. MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY/MICROBES INVOLVED IN WWT
15.4.1. Bacteria
15.4.2. Aerobic Conditions
15.4.3. Anaerobic Conditions
15.4.4. Algae
15.4.5. Fungi
15.4.6. Yeast
15.4.7. Protozoa
15.4.8. Others
15.5. DIFFERENT REMEDIATION TECHNIQUES
15.5.1. Bioremediation
15.5.2. Mycoremediation
15.5.3. Phycoremediation
15.6. ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE OF USING BIOLOGICAL WWT METHODS
15.6.1. Benefits of Biological WWT
15.6.2. Detriments of Biological WWT
15.7. POTENTIAL OF WASTEWATER AS AN ENERGY GENERATION OPTION
15.7.1. Biogas
15.7.2. Floating Gas Holder Type Biogas Plant
15.7.3. Fixed Dome Type Biogas Plant
15.7.4. Bioelectricity
15.7.5. Biodiesel
15.7.6. Biohydrogen
15.7.7. Bioethanol
15.8. ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGE OF USING MICROBES AS AN ENERGY GENERATION METHOD FROM WASTEWATER
15.8.1. Benefits of Microbial Energy Production from Wastewater
15.8.2. Detriments of Microbial Energy Production from Wastewater
15.9. CONCLUSION
Acknowledgments
References
Chapter 16 Actinobacteria from Soils and their Applications in Environmental Bioremediation
16.1. INTRODUCTION
16.2. ORIGIN OF ACTINOBACTERIA
16.3 DISTRIBUTION AND ROLE OF ACTINOBACTERIA IN SOIL
16.4 ACTINOBACTERIAL ENZYMES FOR BIOREMEDIATION
16.5 ACTINOBACTERIA AS BIOREMEDIATION AGENTS
16.5.1. Actinobacteria for Metal Removal
16.5.2. Actinobacteria for Dye Removal
16.5.3. Actinobacteria for Hydrocarbon Removal
16.5.4. Actinobacteria for Pesticide Removal
16.6. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Acknowledgments
References
Part III Current Trends and Future Possibilities
Chapter 17 Current Opinion and Trends for Use of Biochar in Agriculture Sustainability
17.1. INTRODUCTION
17.2. USE OF FEEDSTOCK
17.2.1. Agri Residues
17.2.2. Manures
17.2.3. Sludge
17.2.4. Algal Biochar
17.3. USE OF BIOCHAR IN AGRICULTURE SUSTAINABILITY
17.3.1. Ameliorating Soil Structure and Improve Soil Fertility
17.3.2. Soil Alkalinity
17.3.3. Moisture Retention
17.3.4. Nutrient Content
17.3.5. Enhancement of Microbial Abundance
17.3.6. Improving Crop Productivity
17.3.7. Enhancing Composting Process
17.4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Acknowledgments
References
Chapter 18 Environmentally Sustainable Elimination of Microbes Using Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes: From Water Treatment to Medical Applications
18.1. INTRODUCTION
18.2. INACTIVATION OF MICROORGANISMS BY REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES
18.3. BORON-DOPED DIAMOND ELECTRODES
18.3.1. Application in Water Treatment
18.3.2. Reduction of Biofilms on Medical Devices
18.3.3. Dental Applications
18.4. CONCLUSIONS
Acknowledgements
References
Chapter 19 Enzymatic Intervention as an Ecofriendly Approach in Industries: An Update
19.1. INTRODUCTION
19.2. INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT MICROBIAL ENZYMES
19.2.1. Amylases
19.2.2. Cellulases
19.2.3. Xylanase
19.2.4. Laccases
19.2.5. Proteases
19.2.6. Pectinases
19.3. INNOVATIONS IN MICROBIAL ENZYMES
19.3.1. Mutations
19.3.2. Directed Evolution Approach
19.3.3. Metagenomics Approach
19.3.4. Nanobiotechnology
19.4. ENZYMATIC INTERVENTION IN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
19.4.1. Enzymes Used in the Textile Industry
19.4.2. Enzymes Used in Paper and Pulp Industries
19.4.3. Enzymes in the Food Industry
19.5. CONCLUSION
References
Chapter 20 The Potential of Sulfate-Reducing Microorganisms for the Bioconversion of Dissolved Sulfates to Sulfides Precipitating Metals of a Mine Liquid Effluent
20.1. INTRODUCTION
20.2. METHODOLOGY
20.2.1. UASB Reactor's Experimental Data
20.2.2. Laboratory Scale UASB Reactor Modeling
20.2.3. Thermodynamic Properties and Analysis
20.2.4. Sensitivity Analysis
20.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
20.4 CONCLUSIONS
20.5. FURTHER TRENDS
Acknowledgements
References
Chapter 21 The Human Microbiome: An Imminent Therapy for Mankind - A Review
21.1. INTRODUCTION
21.1.1. Human Gastrointestinal Tract
21.1.2. Metabolic and Immunologic Functions of Indigenous Gut Microbiota
21.2. FECAL MICROBIOTA TRANSPLANTATION
21.2.1. History of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
21.2.2. Etiology of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
21.2.3. Application of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
21.2.4 Fecal Microbiota Transplantation-Based Therapy
21.2.5. Regulation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
21.2.6. Recent Findings
21.3 PROBIOTICS
21.3.1. Probiotics-Based Therapy
21.4. PREBIOTICS
21.4.1. Mode of Action of Prebiotics
21.4.2. The Sway of Prebiotics on the Small Intestine
21.4.3 Prebiotics in Corpulence as Dietary Modulators of Gut Microbiota
21.4.4. Prebiotics Tweak of Safe Capacity
21.4.5. Prebiotics-Based Therapy
21.4.6. Prebiotics as Food Varieties
21.4.7. Focus for Prebiotics
21.5. POSTBIOTICS
21.5.1. Postbiotics-Based Therapy
21.5.2. Postbiotics in the Treatment of Cancer
21.6. SYNBIOTICS
21.6.1. Synbiotics-Based Therapy
21.7. CONCLUSION
References
Chapter 22 Insight into Soil Organic Pollutants: Microbial Bioremediation as a Sustainable Approach Toward Restoration of Agriculture Soil
22.1. INTRODUCTION
22.2. BIOAVAILABILITY OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS IN SOIL
22.3. IMPACT OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS ON SOIL MICROBES AND QUALITY
22.4. BIODEGRADATION OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS
22.5. STRATEGIES OF ORGANIC POLLUTANT DEGRADING MICROORGANISMS
22.6. MICROBIAL BIOREMEDIATION OF ORGANIC POLLUTANTS
22.7. FUTURE CHALLENGES
22.8. CONCLUSION
References
Chapter 23 Agro-Wastes for Cost Effective Production of Industrially Important Microbial Enzymes: An Overview
23.1 INTRODUCTION
23.2 AGRO WASTES: TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS
23.3 AGRO-WASTES USED IN MICROBIAL ENZYME PRODUCTION
23.3.1 Wheat Bran
23.3.2 Rice Bran
23.3.3 Sugarcane Baggase
23.3.4 Coffee Wastes
23.3.5 Tea Wastes
23.3.6 Apple Pomace
23.3.7 Olive Pomace Wastes
23.3.8 Citrus Peel
23.3.9 Banana Peels
23.3.10 Pineapple Wastes
23.3.11 Oil Cakes
23.3.12 Others
23.4 MICROBIAL SOURCES FOR PRODUCTION OF ENZYMES FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES
23.4.1 -Amylase
23.4.2 Cellulase
23.4.3 Xylanase
23.4.4 Pectinases
23.4.5 Lipases
23.4.6 Laccase
23.5 TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN ENZYME PRODUCTION FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES
23.5.1 Solid State Fermentation and Submerged Fermentation Techniques
23.5.2 Submerged Fermentation
23.5.3 Limitations of Fermentation Techniques
23.6 CONCLUSIONS
References
Index
EULA

CONTRIBUTORS

Nurul H. Adenan
School of Science,
Monash University Malaysia,
Selangor, Malaysia;
School of Biology,
Universiti Teknologi,
MARA (UiTM),
Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Gautam Anand
Department of Biotechnology,
Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India;
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research,
Agricultural Research Organization,
The Volcani Center,
Rishon LeZion, Israel

Fuad Ameen
Department of Botany and Microbiology,
College of Science,
King Saud University,
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Juliana H-P Américo-Pinheiro
Post-graduate Program in Environmental Sciences,
Brazil University,
São Paulo, Brazil

Arnab Banerjee
Department of Environmental Science,
Sant Gahira Guru Vishwavidyalaya,
Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, India

Paul O. Bankole
Department of Pure and Applied Botany,
College of Biosciences,
Federal University of Agriculture,
Abeokuta, Ogun, Nigeria

Piotr Barbas
Potato Agronomy Department,
Plant Breeding, and Acclimatization Institute,
National Research Institute,
Serock, Poland

María-del-Carmen Durán-Domínguez-de-Bazúa
Laboratorios de Ingeniería Química Ambiental y de Química Ambiental,
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM,
Mexico City, Mexico

Enrique R. Bazúa-Rueda
Laboratorios de Ingeniería Química Ambiental y de Química Ambiental,
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM,
Mexico City, Mexico

Akanksha Behl
Research Scholar, Amity Institute of Forensic Sciences,
Amity University,
Noida,
Uttar Pradesh, India

Marisela Bernal-González
Laboratorios de Ingeniería Química Ambiental y de Química Ambiental,
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM,
Mexico City, Mexico

Sartaj A. Bhat
River Basin Research Center,
Gifu University,
Gifu, Japan

Muhammad Bilal
School of Life Science and Food Engineering,
Huaiyin Institute of Technology,
Huai'an, China

Andreas Burkovski
Department of Biology,
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- Nürnberg,
Erlangen, Germany

Tania Chalotra
School of Biotechnology,
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University,
Jammu and Kashmir, India

Preeti Chaturvedi Bharagava
Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory,
Environmental Toxicology Group,
CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Ángel E. Chávez-Castellanos
Laboratorios de Ingeniería Química Ambiental y de Química Ambiental,
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM,
Mexico City, Mexico

Ram N. Bharagava
Department of Environmental Microbiology,
School for Environmental Sciences,
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University),
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Bernadetta Bienia
Food Production and Safety Plant,
Carpathian State University in Krosno,
Krosno, Poland

Subir K. Bose
Department of Biotechnology & Microbiology,
Meerut Institute of Engineering and Technology,
Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India

Shraddha Chauhan
Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory,
Environmental Toxicology Group,
CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Shaohua Chen
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources,
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control,
Integrative Microbiology Research Centre,
South China Agricultural University,
Guangzhou, China;
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture,
Guangzhou, China

Jyoti Choudhary
Department of Biotechnology,
Chinmaya Degree College,
Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India;
Department of Botany and Microbiology,
Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalya,
Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India

Pankaj Chowdhary
Environmental Microbiology Laboratory,
Environmental Toxicology Group,
CSIR-Indian
Institute of Toxicology Research (CSIR-IITR),
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Guangyu Cui
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse,
Tongji University,
Shanghai, China

Digvijay Dahiya
Department of Biotechnology,
National Institute of Technology,
Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh, India

Ramesh C. Dubey
Department of Botany and Microbiology,
Gurukul Kangri Vishwavidyalya,
Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India

Shruti Dwivedi
Department of Biotechnology,
Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Luiz F. R. Ferreira
Waste and Effluent Treatment Laboratory,
Institute of Technology and Research (ITP),
Tiradentes University,
Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil

Kuruvalli Gouthami
Department of Biochemistry,
School of Allied Health Sciences,
REVA University,
Bangalore, India

Sanjay Govindwar
Department of Biochemistry,
Shivaji University,
Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India;
Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering,
Hanyang University,
Seoul, South Korea

Supriya Gupta
Department of Biotechnology,
Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Manoj Kumar Jhariya
Department of Farm Forestry,
Sant Gahira Guru Vishwavidyalaya,
Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, India

Suhas Kadam
Research Institute for Dok-do and Ulleung-do Island,
Department of Biology,
School of Life Sciences,
Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea;
Department of Biochemistry,
Shivaji University,
Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India

Bhargab Kalita
Microbial Biotechnology and Protein Research Laboratory,
Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology,
Tezpur University,
Tezpur, Assam, India;
Proteomics Lab,
National Centre for Cell Science,
Pune, Maharashtra, India

Maximilian Koch
Department of Biology,
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen- Nürnberg,
Erlangen, Germany

Nahid Khan
Department of Farm Forestry,
Sant Gahira Guru Vishwavidyalaya,
Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh, India

Rahul Khandare
Amity Institute of Biotechnology,
Amity University,
Maharashtra, India

Ashish Kumar
School of Biotechnology,
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University,
Jammu and Kashmir, India

Abinaya Lakshmi
PG Department of Microbiology,
The American College,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Iswareya Lakshimi
PG Department of Microbiology,
The American College,
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Lavanya Lakshminarayana
Department of Biochemistry,
School of Allied Health Sciences,
REVA University,
Bangalore, India

Manuel J. Leal-Gutiérrez
Laboratorios de Ingeniería Química Ambiental y de Química Ambiental,
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM,
Mexico City, Mexico

Xuyang Lei
Department of Resource and Environmental Engineering,
Hebei Vocational University of Technology and Engineering,
Xingtai, China

Fusheng Li
River Basin Research Center,
Gifu University,
Gifu, Japan

Sujata Mani
Department of Biochemistry,
Gramin Science Vocational College,
Nanded, Maharashtra, India

Amarnath Mishra
Amity Institute of Forensic Sciences,
Amity University Uttar Pradesh,
Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Sandhya Mishra
Environmental Technologies Division,
CSIR - National Botanical Research Institute,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Sarad Kumar Mishra
Department of Biotechnology,
Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University,
Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

Sikandar I. Mulla
Department of Biochemistry,
School of Allied Health Sciences,
REVA University,
Bangalore, India

Anandkumar Naorem
ICAR- Central Arid Zone Research Institute,
Regional Research StationBhuj,
Gujarat, India

Abhishek Patel
ICAR- Central Arid Zone Research Institute,
Regional Research StationBhuj,
Gujarat, India

Atin K. Pathak
School of Energy Management,
Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University,
Jammu and Kashmir, India

Piotr Pszczólkowski
Experimental Station for Cultivar Assessment of Central Crop Research Centre,
Debowa Kloda, Poland

Abbas Rahdar
Department of Physics,
University of Zabol,
Zabol, Iran

Neelu Raina
School of Biotechnology,
Shri...

Systemvoraussetzungen

Als PDF speichern Als Link merken