The Evolvement of Standards in China

1 - Cover [Seite 1]
2 - 1. Research introduction [Seite 21]
2.1 - 1.1. Motivation [Seite 23]
2.2 - 1.2. Theory [Seite 25]
2.3 - 1.3. Methodology [Seite 26]
2.3.1 - 1.3.1. Research Design [Seite 29]
2.3.2 - 1.3.2. Evidence [Seite 33]
3 - 2. Standardization [Seite 36]
3.1 - 2.1. Research Review [Seite 37]
3.2 - 2.2. Definition of Terms [Seite 39]
3.2.1 - 2.2.1. Definition in Academic Research [Seite 41]
3.2.2 - 2.2.2. Purpose of Standards [Seite 42]
3.3 - 2.3. The Economic Effects of Standards [Seite 46]
3.3.1 - 2.3.1. Compatibility and Interface Standards [Seite 47]
3.3.2 - 2.3.2. Variety Reduction Standards [Seite 50]
3.3.3 - 2.3.3. Minimum Quality and Safety Standards [Seite 51]
3.3.4 - 2.3.4. Technological Progress [Seite 54]
3.3.4.1 - Pre-Standards [Seite 55]
3.3.4.2 - Standard Essential Patents [Seite 58]
3.4 - 2.4. Standardization Approach [Seite 60]
3.4.1 - 2.4.1. Standardization System [Seite 63]
3.4.2 - 2.4.2. Standard-Setting Process [Seite 69]
3.4.3 - 2.4.3. Regulatory Intervention [Seite 73]
3.5 - 2.5. Standardization and Developing Countries [Seite 76]
3.5.1 - 2.5.1. Implications of the Standardization Gap [Seite 78]
3.5.2 - 2.5.2. Managing Standardization [Seite 80]
3.5.3 - 2.5.3. International Integration [Seite 84]
3.6 - 2.6. Concluding Remarks [Seite 86]
4 - 3. Complexity Theory and Standardization [Seite 89]
4.1 - 3.1. Research Review [Seite 94]
4.2 - 3.2. Complexity Economics [Seite 96]
4.3 - 3.3. Complexity in Organization Studies [Seite 100]
4.3.1 - 3.3.1. Strands of Complexity Research [Seite 101]
4.3.2 - 3.3.2. Complexity Reduction vs. Harnessing Complexity [Seite 102]
4.3.3 - 3.3.3. Summary of Key Concepts [Seite 103]
4.4 - 3.4. Standardization in Complexity Research [Seite 105]
4.4.1 - 3.4.1. Standardization System [Seite 106]
4.4.2 - 3.4.2. Standard-Setting Process [Seite 108]
4.4.2.1 - Dynamic Interaction Processes [Seite 109]
4.4.2.2 - Power Distribution in Processes of Dynamic Interaction [Seite 111]
4.4.2.3 - Pursuing Strategies in Dynamic Interaction Processes [Seite 114]
4.4.3 - 3.4.3. Regulatory Intervention [Seite 116]
4.5 - 3.5. Concluding Remarks [Seite 119]
5 - 4. Standardization in China [Seite 121]
5.1 - 4.1. Research Review [Seite 122]
5.2 - 4.2. Development of National Standardization [Seite 125]
5.2.1 - 4.2.1. Legal Framework [Seite 126]
5.2.2 - 4.2.2. Development Programs [Seite 128]
5.2.3 - 4.2.3. Status of the System in 2014 [Seite 134]
5.3 - 4.3. National Standardization [Seite 136]
5.3.1 - 4.3.1. Standardization System [Seite 136]
5.3.1.1 - System Fragmentation [Seite 139]
5.3.1.2 - Purpose of Chinese Standards [Seite 141]
5.3.1.3 - China and the International System [Seite 144]
5.3.1.4 - Standardization System in Transition [Seite 148]
5.3.2 - 4.3.2. Standard-Setting Process [Seite 152]
5.3.2.1 - Dynamic Interaction Processes [Seite 154]
5.3.2.2 - Building Capability for Dynamic Interaction [Seite 156]
5.3.2.3 - Power Distribution in Processes of Dynamic Interaction [Seite 157]
5.3.2.4 - Pursuing Strategies in Dynamic Interaction [Seite 159]
5.3.3 - 4.3.3. Regulatory Intervention [Seite 162]
5.3.3.1 - Application of Mandatory Standards [Seite 162]
5.3.3.2 - Regulation of Standard Essential Patents [Seite 164]
5.3.3.3 - Examples of Regulatory Intervention [Seite 168]
5.3.3.4 - Time Division Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access [Seite 170]
5.3.3.5 - WLAN Authentication and Privacy Infrastructure [Seite 174]
5.3.3.6 - Impact on Standardization Development [Seite 176]
5.4 - 4.4. The 2015 Reform Plan for Deepening Standardization [Seite 177]
5.4.1 - 4.4.1. Reform Measures [Seite 179]
5.4.2 - 4.4.2. Implementation Framework [Seite 186]
5.4.3 - 4.4.3. Impact of the Chinese Administration [Seite 189]
5.4.4 - 4.4.4. Implication of the Reform Plan [Seite 191]
5.5 - 4.5. Concluding Remarks [Seite 193]
6 - 5. Standardization in the Chinese Electric Vehicle Sector [Seite 196]
6.1 - 5.1. Research Review [Seite 199]
6.2 - 5.2. Development of the Domestic Electric Vehicle Sector [Seite 201]
6.2.1 - 5.2.1. Involved Institutions [Seite 203]
6.2.2 - 5.2.2. Development Programs [Seite 206]
6.2.2.1 - Decentralized Implementation [Seite 211]
6.2.2.2 - Demonstration Projects [Seite 214]
6.2.2.3 - Status of EV Development in 2014 [Seite 218]
6.3 - 5.3. Standardization in the Chinese Electric Vehicle Sector [Seite 219]
6.3.1 - 5.3.1. Standardization System [Seite 220]
6.3.1.1 - Cross-Sector Standardization [Seite 222]
6.3.1.2 - Subdivision of the Participation Framework [Seite 226]
6.3.1.3 - China and the International EV Standardization Systems [Seite 227]
6.3.1.4 - Multilateral Standardization Cooperation [Seite 228]
6.3.1.5 - Bilateral Standardization Cooperation [Seite 230]
6.3.1.6 - Framework for Standard Development - The Standardization Roadmap [Seite 231]
6.3.2 - 5.3.2. Standard-Setting Process [Seite 236]
6.3.2.1 - Example of a Standard-Setting Process [Seite 239]
6.3.2.2 - Processes of Dynamic Interaction [Seite 241]
6.3.2.3 - Pursuing Strategies in Processes of Dynamic Interaction [Seite 244]
6.3.3 - 5.3.3. Regulatory Intervention [Seite 247]
6.3.3.1 - Vehicle Homologation [Seite 251]
6.3.3.2 - Local Vehicle Homologation [Seite 253]
6.4 - 5.4. Concluding Remarks [Seite 255]
7 - 6. Sino-German Dynamics in Electric Vehicle Standardization [Seite 259]
7.1 - 6.1. Research Review [Seite 261]
7.2 - 6.2. Standardization in Germany [Seite 262]
7.2.1 - 6.2.1. EV Standardization System Approach [Seite 264]
7.2.2 - 6.2.2. National Platform Electromobility [Seite 267]
7.3 - 6.3. Sino-German EV Standardization Cooperation [Seite 269]
7.3.1 - 6.3.1. Joint Approach [Seite 271]
7.3.2 - 6.3.2. Cooperation Objectives [Seite 272]
7.3.3 - 6.3.3. Cooperation Activities [Seite 275]
7.3.3.1 - Advancement and Comparison of Roadmaps [Seite 275]
7.3.3.2 - Prospects for Joint Standard Setting [Seite 278]
7.3.3.3 - Sino-German Electric Vehicle Standardization Project [Seite 280]
7.4 - 6.4. Standardization of the EV Charging System [Seite 283]
7.4.1 - 6.4.1. Introduction to Technical Characteristics [Seite 283]
7.4.2 - 6.4.2. Purpose of Charger Harmonization [Seite 292]
7.4.3 - 6.4.3. Status of the EV Charging Standard in 2014 [Seite 293]
7.5 - 6.5. The Sino-German Charger Debate [Seite 294]
7.5.1 - 6.5.1. Standardization System [Seite 295]
7.5.2 - 6.5.2. Standard-Setting Process [Seite 298]
7.5.2.1 - Evolving Dynamic Processes [Seite 298]
7.5.2.2 - Chinese Charging Solution [Seite 301]
7.5.2.3 - Bilateral Standardization Process [Seite 304]
7.5.2.4 - Transition of Dominance [Seite 307]
7.5.2.5 - Integration of Foreign Companies [Seite 308]
7.5.2.6 - Interaction with EVSE providers [Seite 311]
7.5.2.7 - Impact of the debate [Seite 313]
7.5.2.8 - Argumentation Dynamics [Seite 314]
7.5.2.9 - Example of the Charging Infrastructure [Seite 315]
7.5.2.10 - Example of the Debate CAN versus PLC [Seite 318]
7.5.2.11 - Characteristics of Dynamic Interaction [Seite 321]
7.5.2.12 - Power Distribution in Dynamic Processes [Seite 324]
7.5.3 - 6.5.3. Regulatory Intervention [Seite 327]
7.5.3.1 - Standard Delay vs. Taking Time [Seite 329]
7.5.3.2 - Vehicle Homologation [Seite 332]
7.6 - 6.6. Concluding Remarks [Seite 333]
8 - 7. Conceptual Approach to Deviation of Standards [Seite 338]
8.1 - 7.1. Phases of Standardization Development [Seite 338]
8.1.1 - 7.1.1. Phase 1: Adopt International Standards [Seite 339]
8.1.2 - 7.1.2. Phase 2: Set Deviating Standards [Seite 340]
8.1.2.1 - Initiate Change through Diversity and Difference [Seite 341]
8.1.2.2 - Stimulate Self-Organizing Interaction to Increase Novelty [Seite 342]
8.1.2.3 - Adapt System Structures to Match Interaction Patterns [Seite 343]
8.1.2.4 - Embrace Limitations on Predictability [Seite 344]
8.1.3 - 7.1.3. Phase 3: Set International Standards [Seite 346]
8.2 - 7.2. Three-Phase Standardization Development Concept [Seite 347]
8.3 - 7.3. Concluding Remarks [Seite 351]
9 - 8. Conclusion [Seite 353]
10 - References [Seite 359]
11 - About the Author [Seite 383]