Schweitzer Fachinformationen
Wenn es um professionelles Wissen geht, ist Schweitzer Fachinformationen wegweisend. Kunden aus Recht und Beratung sowie Unternehmen, öffentliche Verwaltungen und Bibliotheken erhalten komplette Lösungen zum Beschaffen, Verwalten und Nutzen von digitalen und gedruckten Medien.
List of contributors xi
Foreword xiii
Preface xv
1 Pesticide Chemistry and Risk Assessment 1Despina Tsipi, Helen Botitsi, and Anastasios Economou
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Pesticide Chemistry 2
1.2.1 Historical Perspective 2
1.2.2 Identity and Physicochemical Properties of Pesticides 2
1.2.3 Pesticide Classification 4
1.2.4 Modes of Action (MoA) 5
1.3 Pesticide Metabolites and Transformation Products 8
1.3.1 Biotransformation 9
1.3.2 Environmental Fate 13
1.4 Risk Assessment 14
1.4.1 Safety Factors 14
1.4.2 Ecological Risk Assessment for Pesticides 15
1.5 Dietary Exposure to Pesticides 17
1.5.1 Acute Exposure or Short-Term Intake 18
1.5.2 Chronic Exposure or Long-Term Intake 18
1.5.3 Cumulative Exposure to Multiple Substances 18
1.6 Pesticide Residues in Food 19
1.6.1 Maximum Residue Limits 19
1.6.2 Residue Definition 20
1.6.3 Reporting of Results 28
1.6.4 Residue Analysis 28
References 29
2 Legislation, Monitoring, and Analytical Quality Control for Pesticide Residues 35Despina Tsipi, Helen Botitsi, and Anastasios Economou
2.1 Introduction 35
2.2 Food Safety 36
2.2.1 CAC of Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization 36
2.2.2 EU Legislation 36
2.2.3 US Food Regulations 40
2.3 Water Quality 44
2.3.1 WHO 44
2.3.2 EU Water Framework Directive 44
2.3.3 US EPA Legislation 46
2.4 Method Validation and Quality Control Procedures for Pesticide Residues Analysis 46
2.4.1 CAC Guidelines 46
2.4.2 EU Guidelines: SANCO Document 47
2.4.3 FDA and EPA Guidelines 48
References 50
3 Advanced Sample Preparation Techniques for MS Analysis 53Yolanda Picó
3.1 Introduction 53
3.2 Conventional Extraction and Cleanup Procedures 54
3.2.1 LLE 54
3.2.2 SPE 61
3.2.3 MSPD 63
3.2.4 QuEChERS 63
3.3 Microextraction Techniques 65
3.3.1 Sorbent-Based Microextraction Techniques 65
3.3.2 Liquid-Based Microextraction Techniques 71
3.4 Alternative Extraction and Cleanup Procedures 73
3.4.1 Alternative Energy Sources to Enhance the Extraction 73
3.4.2 Coupled-Column Liquid Chromatography (LC/PC, LC/LC Techniques) 79
3.4.3 Direct Analysis in Real Time 80
3.5 Conclusions 81
References 82
4 Recent Developments in Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry 91Kaushik Banerjee and Sagar Utture
4.1 Introduction 91
4.2 Advances in GC Separations 91
4.2.1 Multidimensional and Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography 92
4.2.2 Fast GC 94
4.2.3 LPGC 95
4.3 Mass Spectrometric Ionization Techniques 96
4.3.1 Electron Impact Ionization (EI) 97
4.3.2 CI (Positive/Negative Modes) 97
4.3.3 Atmospheric Pressure GC-MS 98
4.4 Mass Analyzers Interfaced to GC 99
4.4.1 Quadrupole Mass Analyzer 100
4.4.2 Ion Trap Mass Analyzer 100
4.4.3 QqQ 100
4.4.4 TOF 102
4.5 Mass Spectral Libraries and Software Approaches in GC-MS Analysis 103
4.6 Matrix Effects in GC-MS Analysis 106
4.7 Conclusions and Perspectives 108
References 108
5 Recent Developments in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Advances in Liquid Chromatographic Separations and Ionization Techniques/Interfaces 113Alexandros G. Asimakopoulos, Anna Bletsou, Kurunthachalam Kannan, and Nikolaos S. Thomaidis
5.1 Introduction 113
5.2 Advances in Liquid Chromatographic Separations 114
5.2.1 Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography 116
5.2.2 Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography 117
5.3 Ionization Techniques/Interfaces 117
5.3.1 Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Techniques 118
5.3.2 Direct Electron Ionization 121
5.4 Ambient Ionization Techniques 122
5.4.1 DESI, Paper Spray, and Low-Temperature Plasma Ambient Ionization 122
5.4.2 Direct Analysis in Real Time 124
5.4.3 Atmospheric Pressure Glow-Discharge Ionization 125
5.5 Summary 125
References 125
6 Recent Developments in Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Mass Detectors 131Silvia Lacorte, Ana Agüera, Montserrat Cortina-Puig, and Cristian Gómez-Canela
6.1 Introduction: Mass Spectrometers 131
6.1.1 Triple Quadrupole Mass Analyzer 132
6.1.2 Quadrupole Ion Trap and Triple Quadrupole Linear Ion Trap 135
6.1.3 TOF Mass Analyzer 138
6.1.4 Hybrid TOF 140
6.1.5 Orbitrap Mass Analyzer 142
6.2 Comparison and Complementarities of Different Mass Analyzers in the LC-MS Analysis of Pesticide Residues and their Metabolites 147
6.2.1 Dynamic Range 147
6.2.2 Scan Rate 147
6.2.3 LODs 148
6.2.4 Mass Accuracy 148
6.2.5 Resolution 149
6.2.6 Selectivity 149
6.2.7 Mass Range 150
6.2.8 Fragmentation 150
6.2.9 Identification Capabilities 150
6.2.10 Quantification 151
6.3 Use of Software Techniques and Spectral Libraries in LC-MS 152
References 154
7 Matrix Effects in Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry 161Helen Stahnke and Lutz Alder
7.1 Introduction 161
7.1.1 Some Definitions 161
7.1.2 Differences between Matrix Effects in GC and LC Methods 162
7.1.3 Differences between ESI and Other API Methods 162
7.1.4 A Typical Alarming Situation 163
7.2 Detection of Matrix Effects 164
7.2.1 Calibration in Solvent versus Matrix-Matched Calibration 164
7.2.2 Postcolumn Infusion 165
7.2.3 Stable Isotope-Labeled Standards 166
7.3 Reduction of Matrix Effects 166
7.3.1 Change of LC Conditions 166
7.3.2 Change of MS Conditions 166
7.3.3 Better Cleanup 169
7.3.4 Backflush of LC Columns 170
7.3.5 Dilute-and-Shoot 171
7.4 Compensation of Matrix Effects 172
7.4.1 Internal standards (IS) 172
7.4.2 Matrix-Matched Standards 174
7.4.3 Postcolumn Infusion 174
7.4.4 Standard Addition 175
7.5 An Attempt to Explain Matrix Effects 176
7.5.1 Substance Classes Causing Matrix Effects 176
7.5.2 Tentative Mechanisms of Matrix Effects 176
7.5.3 A Recent View on the Mechanism of Ion Suppression 178
References 180
8 Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Pesticide Residues and Their Metabolites in Food Samples 187Ana Lozano, Lukasz Rajski, María del Mar Gómez-Ramos, Carmen Ferrer, Maria D. Hernando, and Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba
8.1 Introduction 187
8.2 Application of LC-QqQ-MS/MS for the Targeted Analysis of Pesticide Residues and their Metabolites in Food Samples 189
8.2.1 Sensitivity 192
8.2.2 Linearity 193
8.2.3 Matrix Effects 193
8.3 Application of LC-Hrms to the Analysis of Pesticide Residues and their Metabolites in Food Samples 195
8.3.1 Detection and Identification 195
8.3.2 Resolution 197
8.3.3 MS/MS Identification 200
8.3.4 Sensitivity 201
8.3.5 Linearity 201
8.3.6 Matrix Effect 202
8.4 Data Processing: Automated Database Searches 202
8.5 Conclusions and Future Developments 203
References 203
9 Application of LC-MS/MS and LC-TOF -MS for the Identification of Pesticide Residues and Their Metabolites in Environmental Samples 207Imma Ferrer and E. Michael Thurman
9.1 Introduction and Occurrence of Pesticides in Environmental Samples 207
9.2 State-of-the-Art Techniques for the Identification of Pesticides and their Degradation Products 208
9.2.1 LC-MS/MS for the Analysis of Target Compounds 208
9.2.2 LC-TOF-MS and LC-QTOF-MS for the Analysis of Target and Nontarget Compounds 209
9.3 Use of Accurate Mass Tools for the Identification of Pesticide Residues and their Metabolites in Food and Water Samples 215
9.3.1 Molecular Features 215
9.3.2 Accurate Mass Filters and Isotopic Mass Defect 220
9.3.3 Diagnostic Ion Approach 221
9.3.4 Accurate Mass Databases 223
9.3.5 Accurate Mass Profiling 225
9.4 Conclusions 227
References 227
10 Mass Spectrometric Techniques for the Determination of Pesticide Transformation Products Formed by Advanced Oxidation Processes 231Ioannis K. Konstantinou
10.1 Introduction 231
10.2 Sample Preparation 232
10.3 Hyphenated MS Techniques 237
10.3.1 Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometry: Single-Stage Quadrupole 238
10.3.2 Identification of Pesticide TPs by GC-MS 238
10.3.3 Identification of Pesticide TPs by LC-MS 240
10.3.4 Identification of Pesticide TPs by the Combination of GC-MS and LC-MS 241
10.4 Tandem MS 241
10.4.1 Identification of Pesticide TPs by QqQ-MS 243
10.4.2 Identification of Pesticide TPs by IT-MS 244
10.5 HRMS 249
10.5.1 Single Mass Analyzer 249
10.5.2 Hybrid HR Mass Spectrometers 255
10.6 Conclusions and Perspectives 256
References 259
Index 263
Despina Tsipi,1 Helen Botitsi,1 and Anastasios Economou2
1 Pesticide Residues Laboratory, General Chemical State Laboratory, Athens, Greece
2 Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
And he gave it for his opinion that whoever could make two ears of corn or two blades of grass to grow upon a spot of ground where only one grew before, would deserve better of mankind, and do more essential service to his country, than the whole race of politicians put together.
Jonathan Swift, 1667-1745
Plant protection, worldwide, has a very important role in the food production. One of the most important ways of protecting plants and plant products against harmful organisms, including weeds, and of improving agricultural production is the use of plant protection products (pesticides). Pesticides have brought to the world the most abundant, safe, and cheap food in its history. Pesticides, like pharmaceuticals, are the most thoroughly tested chemicals in the world, and only those that pass strict government testing are authorized for use. Active substances (pesticides) should only be included in plant protection products where it has been demonstrated that they present a clear benefit for plant production and they are not expected to have any harmful effect on human or animal health or any unacceptable effects on the environment, especially if placed on the market without having been officially tested and authorized or if incorrectly used.
Human exposure to pesticides and their metabolites through the food chain could be direct, through the consumption of treated foods, or indirect, through the transfer of residues into products of animal origin from treated feed items. Regulatory agencies, internationally, have provided pesticide regulations increasingly stringent in terms of establishment of the maximum residue limits (MRLs) for pesticides in food of plant and animal origin. Monitoring studies are organized annually by national authorities to enforce compliance with MRLs and to ensure food safety for consumers.
The unlimited number of pesticides and their metabolites, in conjunction with their low concentration levels in various food commodities and environmental matrices, makes the analysis of pesticide residues one of the most challenging and complex areas of analytical chemistry. Pesticide residue methods have been developed worldwide using hyphenated confirmatory techniques, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for the determination of trace concentration levels.
Mass spectrometry (MS) platforms are widely applied in pesticide residues for (i) the determination of pesticide residues and their metabolites in food to ensure safety of the food supply, (ii) the investigation of the contamination of water resources from pesticides and their relevant metabolites, and (iii) the structure elucidation of unknown metabolites or degradation/transformation products (TPs) that sometimes can be more toxic than the parent pesticides.
This chapter provides information regarding the chemistry and toxicity of pesticides, their metabolites, and TPs. Risk assessment topics are discussed. Definitions and explanations in various topics of pesticides are also included.
The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) defines a pesticide as any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, or controlling any pest (Holland, 1996). Looking back over the years, the modern pesticide history begins in 1939 with the synthesis of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) from Paul Muller in Geigy (Switzerland). In 1948, after the successful widespread use of DDT as insecticide to protect human health from diseases (like malaria) and also in agriculture practice, Paul Muller was awarded the Nobel Prize (The History of Pesticides, 2008).
After the synthesis of DDT, a plethora of organic chemical compounds with insecticide, herbicide, and fungicide action started to be synthesized. Later in the 1960s, laboratory studies in the United States proved that some chemical compounds belonging to the class of organochlorine insecticides such as dieldrin, endrin, and aldrin are not degraded in the environment and bioaccumulate in living organisms. In the same time period, DDT residues have been detected in river waters in the United States, while in 1963, the phenomenon of dead fish in Mississippi was attributed to the presence of aldrin in river water (Delaplane, 2000). In 1972, mainly due to their high environmental persistence and bioaccumulation, organochlorine insecticides were banned first in the United States and later in Europe.
Nowadays, more than 1600 pesticides belonging to more than 100 chemical classes are in use worldwide for food production. Information on synthetic and commercially available pesticides is readily found at "The Pesticide Manual" (The Pesticide Manual, 2012). Furthermore, the electronic Compendium of Pesticide Common Names (http://alanwood.net/pesticides/) contains data sheets for more than 1700 different active ingredients and for more than 350 ester and salt derivatives used in pesticide formulations.
The challenge of providing new molecules to control pests is a straightforward task with high rates of scientific success and considerable commercial reward. In no other field of chemistry has been such a diversity of structures arising from the application of the principles of chemistry to the mechanisms of action in pests to develop selectivity and sensitivity in agents toward certain species while reducing toxicity to other forms of life. The dramatic advances and the rapid changes in pesticide chemistry are presented, over the past 50 years, in the conferences in pesticide chemistry of the IUPAC taking place at 4-year intervals.
The systematic names of chemicals are derived from the IUPAC and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS). In addition to a systematic name, CAS assigns a registry number to each chemical. Since systematic names of pesticides are not convenient for general use, the widely accepted common names have been assigned by standard bodies. The Technical Committee 81 of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has devised a system for naming pesticides, with the aim of ensuring that common names indicate similarities between related compounds, do not conflict with any other names, and are suitable for use in many languages. New common names of chemicals for pest control are provisionally approved each year by the committee and are then used in the literature and on product labels. The ISO standards related to the selection of common names for pesticides are ISO 257:2004 (Pesticides and other agrochemicals-Principles for the selection of common names), ISO 765:1976 (Pesticides considered not to require common names), and ISO 1750:1981 (Pesticides and other agrochemicals-Common name) and its amendments.
Evaluation of pesticides begins with clear identification of their physical and chemical properties. Knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of a substance is a necessary prerequisite to understanding its general behavior in metabolism, analytical methods, formulations, and the environment.
Residues of pesticides on/in food commodities are also a function of many factors, which are mainly linked to the physicochemical properties of active ingredients. In the study performed by Thorbek and Hyder (2006), the relationship between physicochemical properties of the active ingredients and residue limits in foodstuffs was explored for fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides, using artificial neural networks. The authors concluded that the physicochemical properties of the active ingredients and crop type explained up to 50% of the variation in residue limits.
Pesticides currently used worldwide belonging to different chemical classes have different physicochemical properties. Physicochemical parameters of pesticides are usually measured according to well-established protocols recognized by national and international agencies (US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), European Union (EU) protocols, etc.). Most of the physicochemical data are measured in the laboratory under well-defined experimental conditions. The main physicochemical data-water solubility, vapor pressure, volatility, stability in water, photodegradation, water-octanol partition coefficient, and acid-base properties-are characteristic of the single pesticide molecule. Short definitions of physicochemical properties are presented here with a commentary aspect on their relevance to various domains like the pesticide-environment interactions, its mode of application, and its analytical determination.
The water solubility of a pesticide is defined as its maximum concentration dissolved in water when that water is both in contact and at equilibrium with the pure chemical. Data on pesticides' water solubility reported are usually measured in mg/1 at 20°C (PPDB IUPAC, 2014, Stephenson et al., 2006). Pesticides with high water solubility will be transported away from the application site by runoff or irrigation water to reach the surface water...
Dateiformat: ePUBKopierschutz: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
Systemvoraussetzungen:
Das Dateiformat ePUB ist sehr gut für Romane und Sachbücher geeignet – also für „fließenden” Text ohne komplexes Layout. Bei E-Readern oder Smartphones passt sich der Zeilen- und Seitenumbruch automatisch den kleinen Displays an. Mit Adobe-DRM wird hier ein „harter” Kopierschutz verwendet. Wenn die notwendigen Voraussetzungen nicht vorliegen, können Sie das E-Book leider nicht öffnen. Daher müssen Sie bereits vor dem Download Ihre Lese-Hardware vorbereiten.Bitte beachten Sie: Wir empfehlen Ihnen unbedingt nach Installation der Lese-Software diese mit Ihrer persönlichen Adobe-ID zu autorisieren!
Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer E-Book Hilfe.