Direct versus Indirect Realism: A Neurophilosophical Debate on Consciousness brings together leading neuroscientists and philosophers to explain and defend their theories on consciousness. The book offers a one-of-a-kind look at the radically opposing theories concerning the nature of the objects of immediate perception-whether these are distal physical objects or phenomenal experiences in the conscious mind. Each side-neuroscientists and philosophers-offers accessible, comprehensive explanations of their points-of-view, with each side also providing a response to the other that offers a unique approach on opposing positions.
It is the only book available that combines thorough discussion of the arguments behind both direct and indirect realism in a single resource, and is required reading for neuroscientists, neurophilosophers, cognitive scientists and anyone interested in conscious perception and the mind-brain connection.
- Combines discussion of both direct realism and indirect realism in a single, accessible resource
- Provides a thorough, well-rounded understanding of not only the opposing views of neuroscientists and philosophers on the nature of conscious perception, but also insight into why the opposition persists
- Offers a unique "dialog" approach, with neuroscientists and philosophers providing responses and rebuttals to one another's contributions
Sprache
Verlagsort
Verlagsgruppe
Elsevier Science & Techn.
ISBN-13
978-0-12-812142-9 (9780128121429)
Schweitzer Klassifikation
Section 1: Indirect Realists1. The Metaphysical Foundations of Contemporary Neuroscience: A House Built on Straw2. A Defense of Representational Realism3. Direct Realism: A Perspective from the Neurosciences4. Against the Combination of Materialism and Direct Realism
Section 2: Direct Realists5. Disjunctive Naive Realism6. A Non-naive Direct Realist Account of Perceptual Experience7. The Epistemological version of Direct Realism8. The Distinction between Metaphysical and Epistemological Direct Realism9. Seeing Things10. Conclusions