Chapter 2
Cinder Core Architecture and Internals
Go beneath the surface of OpenStack Cinder to unravel the sophisticated machinery powering cloud block storage at scale. This chapter lays bare the intricate interplay of processes, data flows, and architectural abstractions that transform user requests into robust storage operations. With a focus on the internal logic, security, and extensibility of Cinder, you'll come away equipped to understand, diagnose, and optimize this foundational OpenStack service in demanding cloud environments.
2.1 Cinder Service Processes and Roles
OpenStack Cinder, the block storage service, is architected as a collection of discrete, interacting processes that collectively provide reliable, scalable, and manageable block storage resources. Understanding the specific roles and cooperative functions of these processes-cinder-api, cinder-scheduler, cinder-volume, and cinder-backup-is crucial for designing robust production deployments and optimizing performance.
The cinder-api service functions as the front door to the Cinder ecosystem. It exposes the RESTful API endpoints that clients, such as OpenStack Nova or external users, interact with to create, list, modify, or delete volumes and snapshots. Internally, cinder-api translates these API calls into database updates and RPC calls, acting as a gateway distributing requests to other background services. It handles request authentication, input validation, and enforces policy for volume management operations. Architecturally, cinder-api is stateless, meaning horizontal scaling can be achieved by deploying multiple API nodes behind a load balancer, thus improving availability and throughput.
The cinder-scheduler service is responsible for intelligent placement decisions of volume creation and migration requests. Upon receiving a request from cinder-api via messaging queues, the scheduler applies built-in filters and weighing mechanisms to determine the most suitable backend storage driver or host to satisfy the requested volume's characteristics (e.g., size, performance requirements, availability zone). Filters include checks on storage capacity, backend status, and specific driver capabilities. The scheduler works in conjunction with the centralized Cinder database and messaging system to maintain a consistent state. To ensure fault tolerance, multiple scheduler instances can be run concurrently, where only one instance processes scheduling requests at a time, while others serve as hot standby, reducing the risk of a single point of failure.
The cinder-volume service is the workhorse that executes volume management operations on backend storage devices. Once the scheduler selects a target backend, cinder-volume processes tasks such as creating, attaching, detaching, deleting volumes, and snapshotting. This service interfaces directly with various storage backends via appropriate volume drivers, which abstract vendor-specific protocols and capabilities, including iSCSI, Fibre Channel, NFS, and Ceph RBD. Each cinder-volume process typically manages a single backend or storage pool, enabling isolation and targeted scaling. Resource-intensive operations, such as volume migration or consistency group handling, are also coordinated here. For high availability, deploying multiple cinder-volume services, each connecting to distinct storage arrays or pools, distributes workloads and enables granular fault tolerance.
The cinder-backup service provides robust volume data protection via backups. It interacts with different backup storage destinations, including object stores and network-attached storage, to perform incremental or full backups of volume data. Backup scheduling is initiated via API requests passed from cinder-api, whereas cinder-backup coordinates the data transfer, tracking backup status and metadata within the Cinder database. Isolation of backup operations from the core volume services prevents interference with real-time block storage performance and allows independent scaling of backup workflows. Best practices recommend deploying cinder-backup services on dedicated nodes or container instances with high network throughput to optimize data ingestion rates.
Inter-process communication between these services relies heavily on reliable message queues, typically RabbitMQ, and a centralized SQL database backend such as MariaDB or PostgreSQL. The message queue facilitates asynchronous RPC communication, signaling tasks and status updates, while the database maintains system state, volume metadata, and policy configurations. This decoupled design enables components to operate asynchronously, improving resilience and scalability.
Deployment best practices emphasize containerization or dedicated virtual machines for each service to allow isolated resource allocation and simplified upgrades. API and scheduler services, due to their stateless nature, horizontally scale with relative ease, supporting load balancing and high availability. Conversely, cinder-volume services require careful backend mapping and resource monitoring to avoid oversubscription or performance bottlenecks. Monitoring tools should track metrics such as API request latency, scheduler queue depth, backend storage utilization, and backup throughput to identify scaling needs proactively.
Scaling strategies benefit from understanding workload patterns: bursty creation and deletion requests necessitate additional cinder-api instances and scheduler responsiveness, while large volume data transfers and migrations drive the scaling of cinder-volume and cinder-backup nodes. Employing placement aggregates and availability zones at the scheduler level aids in geographic or fault domain-aware scheduling, ensuring workloads are distributed according to organizational policies and redundancy requirements.
Cinder's modular architecture leverages these four primary processes with specialized responsibilities that coordinate seamlessly through messaging and database state to deliver a scalable and fault-tolerant block storage system. Enhanced observability, thoughtful placement of services, and adherence to resource isolation principles form the foundation for stable and efficient Cinder deployments in production OpenStack clouds.
2.2 Remote Procedure Calls and Messaging
At the heart of Cinder's distributed architecture lies a sophisticated messaging fabric that underpins all inter-component communication. This messaging layer, primarily orchestrated by oslo.messaging, enables reliable, asynchronous communication among the various microservices, facilitating both Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) and messaging patterns essential for scalability and fault tolerance.
oslo.messaging is a library designed to provide consistent and extensible RPC and notification messaging abstractions across OpenStack projects, including Cinder. It supports multiple message queue backends, such as RabbitMQ, Qpid, and Redis, allowing flexible integration depending on deployment requirements.
Message queue (MQ) providers act as intermediaries that guarantee message delivery, queueing, routing, and load balancing. RabbitMQ is most commonly employed in Cinder deployments due to its mature AMQP implementation, efficient message routing mechanisms, and comprehensive support for clustering and federation. MQ providers ensure that messages are durably stored and forwarded even in the presence of transient network failures or service restarts.
Cinder leverages two primary communication paradigms over the messaging fabric: direct RPC calls and fan-out notifications.
-
RPC calls enable synchronous request-response interactions between client and server services. For instance, when the Cinder API service receives a volume creation request, it issues an RPC to the volume manager service. This RPC message is serialized and dispatched through the message queue to the designated RPC server endpoint subscribed to the particular topic.
The invocation follows an asynchronous transport model internally: the client places the message on the queue and waits for a response, while the server consumes the message, executes the requested procedure, and replies on a response queue. This decouples client and server lifecycles, allowing robust scaling and failover.
- Notifications support the publish-subscribe model. Services emit event messages without expecting a direct response. For example, volume state changes trigger notification broadcasts to all subscribed listeners (e.g., for auditing, monitoring, or quota enforcement). This enables loosely coupled integration and extensibility.
Routing in oslo.messaging is topic-based: message endpoints listen on specific queues associated with topics and servers. Each service component registers callbacks on one or more topics, identified by strings often reflecting the service role and region. This topic architecture ensures messages...
