Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert

Preface and Acknowledgments Selected Robinson Bibliography Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements on a Core of Wrongdoing Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is Just? Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its Implications Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and Policy Tool Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment Factors Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice & the Utility of Desert