Schweitzer Fachinformationen
Wenn es um professionelles Wissen geht, ist Schweitzer Fachinformationen wegweisend. Kunden aus Recht und Beratung sowie Unternehmen, öffentliche Verwaltungen und Bibliotheken erhalten komplette Lösungen zum Beschaffen, Verwalten und Nutzen von digitalen und gedruckten Medien.
Rehab O. Abdel Rahman is Nuclear Engineering Lecturer, at the Atomic Energy Authority of Egypt, Cairo, Egypt. He has been working in the field of nuclear engineering for almost 20 years, and has published in several international journals. His areas of research include radioactive waste management: performance assessment, material selection, cementitious material.
Ravil Z. Rakhimov and Nailia R. Rakhimova are Professor and Assistant Professor at Kazan State University of Architecture and Engineering, Russian Federation. Ravil has almost forty years' experience of teaching in the fields of materials science and cementitious materials. He is the author of more than 35 patents, 29 monographs and textbooks and nearly 600 papers in Russian. Current research interests include building material science and cementitious materials. Nailia has fifteen years' experience in materials science, and mineral binders. She holds 6 patents, has written one monograph and more than100 papers, mostly in Russian.
Michael Ojovan is Assistant Professor at the University of Sheffield, Visiting Professor at Imperial College, London, and Nuclear Engineer at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Austria. Prior to this he spent he 20 years at The Moscow Scientific and Industrial Association "Radon", the leading radioactive waste research institution of Russian Federation. He is a Fellow of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences and a Technical Expert of the International Atomic Energy Agency. He has published over 290 peer reviewed scientific papers, 6 books on nuclear materials, 6 book chapters, 14 IAEA documents and has 42 patents. He has also been awarded research grants totalling over £7M.
About the Authors xi
Preface xiii
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background of Nuclear Waste Problem 1
1.2 Nuclear Industry Facilities 2
1.2.1 NFC Facilities 2
1.2.2 Radioisotope Production and Application 8
1.3 Nuclear Waste Sources and Classification 10
1.4 Nuclear Waste Management 13
1.4.1 Development of Policy Principles, Strategy and Legal Framework 14
1.4.2 Technical Options for a Waste Management System 16
1.4.3 Technical Factors that Affect Technology Selection 22
1.5 Wasteform Materials 23
References 25
2 Cements: Portland Cement 27
2.1 Cements 27
2.2 Portland Cement: Manufacture, Mineral Composition, Properties 28
2.3 Phase and Mineral Composition of Ordinary Portland Cement 30
2.4 Properties of Portland Cement 31
2.5 Hydration of Portland Cement 32
2.5.1 Hydration and Hydraulic Activity of Clinker Phases and Portland Cement 32
2.5.2 Process Chemistry, Products and Hydration Stages 35
2.5.3 Microstructure, Phases and Properties of Fresh and Hardened Cement Paste 40
2.6 Interaction of Portland Cements with Water and Soil 44
2.6.1 Ground Waters and Their Interaction with Cement Hydration Products 44
2.6.2 Soil and Its Interaction with Cement Hydration Products 48
References 51
3 Portland Cements with Mineral and Chemical Admixtures 53
3.1 Chemical Admixtures to Control the Structure and Properties of Portland Cements 53
3.1.1 Accelerators 55
3.1.2 Retarders 56
3.1.3 Plasticizers, Super-Plasticizers and Hyperplasticizers 57
3.2 Mineral Admixtures in the Control of the Composition, Structure and Properties of Cements 61
3.2.1 Classification of Mineral Admixtures for Cements 62
3.2.2 Portland Cements with Mineral Admixtures from Natural Rocks and Minerals 66
3.2.3 Portland Cements with Mineral Admixtures from Wastes of Various Industries 67
3.2.4 Portland Cements with Synthetic Mineral Admixtures 69
3.2.5 Portland Cements with Hybrid Mineral and Organic-Mineral Admixtures 70
References 74
4 Alternative Binders 79
4.1 Calcium Aluminate Cements 80
4.1.1 Chemical and Mineralogical Composition of CACs 80
4.1.2 Hardening of CACs 81
4.1.3 Properties of CACs 82
4.2 Calcium Sulphoaluminate Cements 83
4.2.1 Chemical and Mineralogical Composition of CSACs 84
4.2.2 Hardening of CSACs 84
4.2.3 Properties of CSACs 86
4.3 Phosphate Cements 87
4.3.1 Properties of Phosphate Cements 89
4.3.2 Magnesium Phosphate Cements 90
4.3.3 Calcium Phosphate Cements 90
4.4 Alkali-Activated Cements 92
References 99
5 Cement Properties, Characterization and Testing 105
5.1 Water/Cement Ratio, Water Requirement, Workability and Water Retention 105
5.2 Setting Time 109
5.3 Specific Surface Area and Particle Size Distribution 111
5.4 Heat Evolution 113
5.5 Strength 114
5.6 Freeze-Thaw Resistance 119
5.7 Microstructure and Analysis 121
References 124
6 Radioactive Waste Cementation 127
6.1 Radioactive Waste Streams for Cementation 127
6.2 Liquid Waste 130
6.2.1 Organic Liquid Waste for Cementation 130
6.2.2 Aqueous Waste for Cementation 132
6.3 Bulk Solid Radioactive Wastes 138
6.3.1 Bulk Metallic Wastes 138
6.3.2 Bulk Concrete Wastes 140
6.3.3 Bulk Graphite 142
6.3.4 Bulk Hazardous Wastes 143
6.4 Fragmented (Dispersed) Solid Wastes 143
6.4.1 Compactable, Combustible Wastes 144
6.4.2 Non-compactable, Non-combustible Wastes 145
6.5 Additives for Radioactive Waste Cementation 147
6.5.1 Lime 148
6.5.2 Blast Furnace Slag 149
6.5.3 Clay Minerals 149
6.6 Cement-Based Composite Materials 152
6.7 Cement-Based Wasteform Optimization 153
References 154
7 Waste Cementation Technology 159
7.1 Methods of Liquid Waste Cementation 159
7.1.1 Regular Mixer Technology 161
7.1.2 Disposable Stirrer Technology 163
7.1.3 Slant Mixer Technology 167
7.1.4 High Energy and High Shear Mixer Technology 168
7.1.5 In-line Mixing Technology 168
7.2 Methods for Cementation of Fragmented (Dispersed) Solid Waste 168
7.3 Methods for Cementation of Bulk Solid Waste 173
7.4 Quality Control of Technological Processes and Materials Obtained 174
References 175
8 Cementitious Wasteform Durability 177
8.1 Wasteform Durability Requirements 177
8.2 Role of Material Performance 181
8.3 Expected Performance of Cements 182
8.4 Wasteform Leaching Parameters 185
8.5 Laboratory Tests 186
8.6 Long-Term Field Tests 188
8.6.1 Mound Type Repository Field Tests 189
8.6.2 Vault Repository Field Tests 194
8.7 Effect of Radiation 195
8.8 Biological Effects 196
8.9 Role of Filling Materials 197
References 198
9 Performance Assessment 201
9.1 Historical Disposal Practice 202
9.2 Disposal Facility Design 204
9.2.1 Shallow Land Disposal Options 206
9.2.2 Underground Disposal Option 208
9.3 Modelling Approaches 210
9.4 Performance Assessment 212
9.5 Safety Case 216
References 217
10 Future Trends and Concluding Remarks 221
10.1 Role of Cementitious Materials 221
10.2 Novel Cementitious Materials 222
10.3 Concluding Remarks 224
References 225
Index 227
By definitions a waste is a material for which no further use is foreseen. For legal and regulatory purposes a radioactive (nuclear) waste is that waste which contains or is contaminated with radionuclides at concentrations or activities greater than clearance levels as established by the regulatory body. It is always recognized that this definition is purely for regulatory purposes, and that material with activity concentrations equal to or less than clearance levels is still radioactive from a physical viewpoint, although the associated radiological hazards are considered negligible [International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2003a]. Over recent years large amounts of radioactive waste have been generated during the production and application of radioactive materials both for peaceful and military purposes. The knowledge of the hazard associated with exposure to these wastes led to the adaptation of waste management strategies that relies on the concepts of containment and confinement. In radioactive waste repository, confinement may be provided by the wasteform and its container, whereas containment may be provided by the surrounding host rock (IAEA, 2013). The selection of the wasteform type and disposal option is determined based on the hazard imposed by the wastes. Although containment and confinement concepts have proven efficiency in isolating nuclear waste, there were some cases dating back to the early 1950s where radioactive wastes were disposed of unsolidified in unlined trenches. These practices led to radioactivity leaks in many sites, such as in Hanford, Washington, USA. The evaluation of the remediation costs and the hazard imposed from these practices on human health and the environment resulted in recognition of the need to have more rigorous confinement and containment strategies. This led to the development of new waste management systems which utilize volume reduction techniques and solidification/stabilization technologies to produce stable wasteforms and implement the multi-barrier disposal concept to ensure safe disposal of these wastes.
Currently safe management of nuclear wastes is a subject that is receiving considerable attention from public and different governmental, regional and international bodies. This recognition has not only stemmed from the huge volume of the cumulative wastes and the diversity of their chemical, biological and radiological hazards but also because the public relates their acceptance for new nuclear power programmes to their confidence in the waste management practice (Abdel Rahman, 2012). In the following sections, the facilities that generate nuclear wastes will be briefly introduced, different waste classification schemes and waste management activities will be presented and matrix material for nuclear waste immobilization will be highlighted.
The nuclear fuel cycle ( NFC) and radioisotope production and application facilities are considered the main generators for nuclear wastes. The NFC includes all operations associated with the production of nuclear energy, namely mining and milling, processing and enrichment of uranium or thorium; manufacture of nuclear fuel; operation of nuclear reactors (including research reactors); reprocessing of nuclear fuel; any related research and development activities and all related waste management activities (including decommissioning). During the lifecycle activities of these facilities, different amounts of wastes with varying characteristics are produced. Within the operational and decommissioning phases only nuclear wastes are generated whereas other phases produce non-nuclear wastes, for example soils from excavation, building materials and so on. Nuclear wastes produced within the operational phase are usually characterized by their limited amounts; on the other hand, a much larger volume of waste is generated during the decommissioning phase (IAEA, 2007). This section will introduce operational processes that take place in different nuclear facilities and lead to generation of radioactive wastes, whereas the wastes generated during the decommissioning phase of these facilities will be discussed in Chapter 6.
The NFC refers to activities associated with the production of electricity using nuclear reactors (IAEA, 2003a). They are classified based on the existence of recycling option into two categories, namely open and closed NFCs, as illustrated in Figure 1.1 (Ojovan and Lee, 2005). Facilities that operate from nuclear ore extraction to fuel loading into a nuclear reactor are known as front-end NFC facilities; these include mines, mills, fuel enrichment and fuel fabrication facilities. After using the fuel in the reactor, the facilities that deal with used (spent) fuel and radioactive waste are referred to as back-end NFC facilities; they include fuel storage and/or fuel reprocessing plants. The operation of each facility is associated with the generation of different types of nuclear wastes. It is worth mentioning that nuclear materials generally can pose chemical, radiological and flammability hazards. Accordingly, there is a need to specify these hazards and implement certain safety measures to counter these hazards. Table 1.1 lists the safety aspects associated with the hazard of nuclear wastes at NFC facilities (IAEA, 2005a).
Figure 1.1 Open and closed NFCs.
Reproduced with permission from Ojovan and Lee, 2005. © 2005, Elsevier
Table 1.1 Hazard identification at different NFC facilities
Reproduced with permission from IAEA, 2005a. © 2005, IAEA.
X, hazard may be of concern; XX, hazard of concern.
Mining uranium ore is the first step in any NFC, where uranium is extracted from a mine and then concentrated in a mill. The uranium mill is usually located near the mine to reduce shipping charges. The concentration processes involved include crushing, grinding, leaching, precipitation, solvent extraction and ion exchange (Benedict et al., 1981). The concentrate is composed of uranyl nitrate solution, [UO2(NO3)2], and solid ammonium diuranate, [(NH4)2U2O7], which is known as yellow cake. The operation of these facilities generates large amounts of solid wastes in the form of natural materials, that is displaced soil, and radioactive contaminated tailings. The radioactivity content in tailings is above the background level; usually they are returned to the pit from where the uranium ore was originally extracted and the site rehabilitated for further use (see Section 6.4). In some cases this operation is not economically feasible, so the tailings are stored then transported to a long-term stable structure and the site is rehabilitated for further use (Alexander and McKinley, 2007). Also, large volumes of effluent are generated during the operation of mines and mills; historically these effluents were held in storage ponds and eventually evaporated to solids (Benedict et al., 1981). Currently the treatment of these effluents and their control is becoming a concern because of the strengthened regulatory requirements. The main problems that arise when dealing with these effluents are due to their large volumes and the nature of contaminants where both radioactive and non-radioactive toxicants exist (IAEA, 2004).
Refining uranium concentrate is performed by purifying the concentrate, where chemical impurities are removed, followed by conversion of purified concentrate into a suitable chemical form. The purification is conducted by dissolving the concentrate in nitric acid and then applying solvent extraction to remove impurities. Purified concentrate is then converted to uranium trioxide (UO3) or uranium dioxide ( UO2), depending on the type of reactor. To produce UO3, either thermal denitration (TDN) or ammonium diuranate (ADU) could be used, where ammonium uranyl carbonate (AUC) is used to obtain UO2. TDN is a one-step process from which fine UO3 powder is produced. With ADU and AUC, the purified uranium is subjected to precipitation, filtration and calcinations/calcinations with hydrogen; Figure 1.2 illustrates these processes. The wastes arising from refining processes are mainly generated during the purification step. They include liquid effluent sludge, insoluble and filter aid, and drums (IAEA, 1999a).
Figure 1.2 Flowchart for the production of uranium trioxide and uranium dioxide....
Dateiformat: ePUBKopierschutz: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
Systemvoraussetzungen:
Das Dateiformat ePUB ist sehr gut für Romane und Sachbücher geeignet – also für „fließenden” Text ohne komplexes Layout. Bei E-Readern oder Smartphones passt sich der Zeilen- und Seitenumbruch automatisch den kleinen Displays an. Mit Adobe-DRM wird hier ein „harter” Kopierschutz verwendet. Wenn die notwendigen Voraussetzungen nicht vorliegen, können Sie das E-Book leider nicht öffnen. Daher müssen Sie bereits vor dem Download Ihre Lese-Hardware vorbereiten.Bitte beachten Sie: Wir empfehlen Ihnen unbedingt nach Installation der Lese-Software diese mit Ihrer persönlichen Adobe-ID zu autorisieren!
Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer E-Book Hilfe.