Project Reviews, Assurance and Governance

Rezensionen / Stimmen

'These days it seems barely a week goes by without some big IT Project in the news, normally for all the wrong reasons - the thing that links them is the dreaded F-word?, no not Gordon Ramsay but Failure. It's a sobering fact that over 60% percent of IT based projects are judged to be failures. In other words, what they delivered fell short of what they set out to deliver...Part of the Answer, according to Dr Oakes, lies in conducting Project Reviews, you know, that part of the project that gets squeezed in at the very end of the project lifecycle (this is assuming it happens at all). In his book Project Reviews, Assurance and Governance, Dr Oakes makes a compelling case for taking Project Reviews more seriously. He argues that far from being something to be slotted in if you have time, Project Reviews are a critical part of the project and fundamental to ensuring you learn from your mistakes and keeping your projects on track.' Andrew Hatton, IS Project Manager, Oxfam GB 'The book provides good guidance on the role of PMO in reviews, assurance and governance, recognising the various dimensions of a PMO and the different positions it can sit within the organisation. It takes time to look at the potential areas of conflict and the need for a level of independence which sometimes cannot be provided by the PMO. What I found particularly interesting was the governance matrix (which I hadn't seen before). I think this is an excellent tool to identify and articulate the role of the PMO. I found the book very easy to read, got some practical hints and tips about reviews and it made me think in more detail on PMO's role in governance.' APM PMO SIG Newsletter, February 2014