Doing Psychiatry Wrong

Rezensionen / Stimmen

"Case histories in Doing Psychiatry Wrong: A Critical and Prescriptive Look at a Faltering Profession reveal a pragmatic, humanistic psychotherapy approach in which the patient's story must be heard in order to make sense of the illness and the response to it. With skill and gumption, Muller challenges diagnoses made too easily but inaccurately by colleagues, including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, while they often miss delirium. Readers may like or dislike his claim that patients have an active role in their ailment and its amelioration, but he argues well, giving neuroscience and pharmacology their due while at the same time recognizing the importance of personal responsibility and social milieu. He cares about patients and psychiatry, voicing a protest that is also a tribute to a profession whose very name means soul doctor. This book reminds all mental health professionals that biology is always a factor, but not necessarily the most important factor, in human behavior. Biological preemption has done a disservice to us all, and Rene Muller's prescription should be taken seriously." - E. James Lieberman, PsycCRITIQUES, 53 (5), 2008

"Doing Psychiatry Wrong powerfully challenges the current paradigm of mental illness. In his writing, Muller is not afraid to go against the grain of current societal beliefs, and the radical approach that he adopts gives his stories universal appeal. This is a passionate argument against current psychiatric methods of diagnosis and treatment. Regardless of the theoretical orientation of the reader, Muller forces mental health professionals to examine and possibly question their own approach to intervention." - Abby L. Marquart, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 2008

"Rene J. Muller, a clinician with a background in emergency room evaluations and in writing accounts of these encounters for the monthly publication Psychiatric Times, has produced a book severely critiquing the current reliance of the psychiatric profession on biological psychiatry. A phenomenologically-based critique of the DSM system is warranted. Muller's basic points remain important and argued with conviction. For too many of its practicioners psychiatry has lost the mind. The emphasis on biological psychiatry has gone to an extreme. Muller seeks to remedy this distortion." - Stephen Rojcewicz, PhD., Journal of Phenomenological Psychology