Medical Negligence: Non-Patient and Third Party Claims

Rezensionen / Stimmen

'A book that explores these unusual aspects of health care liability is very welcome. Its style and organization is matched by its erudition. In dealing with an area of growing importance, the book provides a very useful addition to the medical law library.' Richard Lewis, Cardiff University, UK 'Professor Mulheron's path-breaking book addresses what is set to become an important dimension to professional liability. Approaching the subject with characteristic innovation and thoroughness, she has written what will become a standard reference work for both practicing and academic lawyers. Professor Mulheron brings her extensive knowledge of common law developments to bear so the book will be of use across jurisdictions. Her insights will make the book of value not only to those interested in medical and professional liability law but to all who wish to know where the law of civil wrongs is heading.' The Honourable Mr Justice Cranston FBA, Judge of the High Court, Queens Bench Division '... an unusual book... [which] builds upon the author's well-known comparative research interest in common law legal systems... The book deals systematically with the possible range of non-patients who may have suffered by reason of the acts and omissions of healthcare professionals. The author enumerates with great rigour the range of potential duty situations and the types of injury that may be sustained. Her comparative interest in decisions of other common law courts is vindicated in the wealth of decisions (from supreme courts to small claims courts) which inform the argument. ... An attractive feature of the book is the detailed dissection and tabulation of the competing policy arguments deployed in favour and against the existence of a duty: even if public policy is still an unruly horse, the reasons informing the unruliness are laid bare. ... recommended to HCPs, lawyers and those interested in comparative studies of the common law in the medical field.' Modern Law Review '