Conflict Transformation and Reconciliation

Rezensionen / Stimmen

'Maddison perceptively and convincingly argues against the view of reconciliation as a utopian state where conflict is absent, and instead emphasizes the role of agonistic relationship in constructing a shared polity where disagreements and tension remain part of democracies and post conflict societies. The book is essential to scholars and practitioners who search for a more realistic understanding of conflict resolution and reconciliation' -- Elazar Barkan, Columbia University, USA

'Maddison writes that she hopes that this book will facilitate a deeper understanding of reconciliation in countries scarred by histories of violence and oppression. Maddison eloquently achieves this aim by presenting a complex understanding of reconciliation at the constitutional, institutional and relational levels. Through rich and original comparative material primarily focusing on South Africa, Australia, Guatemala and Northern Ireland, Maddison leaves the reader with a profound sense of the complexity of what it takes to build meaningful conflict transformation and reconciliation. Through in-depth interview work with a range of stakeholders, Maddison charts a way forward, both at the micro and macro levels, for those grappling with the challenges of coming out of conflict. The insights contained in Conflict Transformation and Reconciliation means it should be a key reference point for practitioners, academics and policy makers working in and with societies transitioning from a legacy of political violence' -- Brandon Hamber, Ulster University, Northern Ireland

'While an analysis of four diverse societies may appear overly ambitious and even unclear, Maddison's choice is both the strength of her work and its key contribution to the transitional justice field. The differences in type of conflict and demographics in the countries are productive, allowing Maddison to set out the commonalities of reconciliation praxis. Building on her experience with interview-based methodologies, Maddison bases her argument on interviews with 'over 80 reconciliation actors from all sides of these deep divisions'. She provides a strong answer to the existential question raised earlier, of how best to understand conflict.' -- Sophie Rigney, International Journal of Transitional Justice