Argumentation in Political Deliberation

Name: Argumentation in Political Deliberation | Accusation of inconsistency in response to criticism
Brand: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Price: 105.99 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

Accusation of inconsistency in response to criticism

Marcin Lewinski Dima Mohammed(Herausgeber*in)

John Benjamins Publishing Company

1. Auflage

Erschienen am 10. Juli 2015

V, 178 Seiten

E-Book

PDF mit Adobe-DRM

Systemvoraussetzungen

978-90-272-6827-3 (ISBN)

105,99 €inkl. 7% MwSt.

Systemvoraussetzungen

für PDF mit Adobe-DRM

E-Book Einzellizenz

Als Download verfügbar

Beschreibung

Weitere Details

Weitere Ausgaben

Personen

Inhalt

Argumentation in Political Deliberation
Editorial page
Title page
LCC data
Table of contents
Argumentation in political deliberation
1. Argumentation theory and political deliberation
2. Overview of the volume
Acknowledgements
References
Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation
1. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
2. Conventionalization of communicative practices in communicative activity types
3. Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering
4. Pragma-dialectical research of argumentative discourse in the political domain
References
Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate
1. Introduction
2. Plenary debate in the European Parliament
3. Preliminary observations concerning strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate
4. Conclusion
References
Pursuing multiple goals in European Parliamentary Debates
1. Introduction
2. Debating the EU response to "exceptional migratory flows"
3. The standpoints and the arguments advanced
4. The goals pursued by the MEPs
5. Theoretical implications
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation
1. Introduction
2. Two methods of public deliberation
2.1 Consensus conference
French consensus conference on nanotechnology
2.2 Public hearing
The public hearing on nanotechnology
2.3 Public participation vs. public communication types of deliberation
3. Defining public deliberation within argumentation studies
4. Counter discourse in the two methods of public deliberation
4.1 Counter discourse in the consensus conference
4.2 Counter discourse in the public hearing
5. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements
References
Deliberation digitized
1. Introduction
2. Argument and disagreement management
2.1 Reconsidering argument activities
2.2 Disagreement management
2.3 Argument and felicity's condition
3. Designing disagreement space
3.1 Communication design work and designs for communication
3.2 Practical theories and responsibilities for interaction
3.3 Argument, technology, deliberation
4. Conclusion
References
(How) do participants in online discussion forums create 'echo chambers'?
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical and empirical exploration
3. Political online forums as argumentative communities
4. Research design
The online forum Climategate.nl
Data selection
Method of analysis
5. Analysis
Fragment A: 8-12 December 2009
Fragment B: 17 January-3 February 2010
Fragment C: 14-21 June 2010
Fragment D: 18-21 April 2011
Fragment E: 27 April-2 May 2011
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation
1. Introduction
2. Bin Laden is dead and what now
3. Participants in online deliberation
4. Sides, positions, cases, and parties in argumentation
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
Subject index

Systemvoraussetzungen

Als PDF speichern Als Link merken