Interrogation, Confession, and Truth

Name: Interrogation, Confession, and Truth | Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure
Brand: Nomos
Price: 58.0 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure

Lutz Eidam Michael Lindemann Andreas Ransiek(Herausgeber*in)

Nomos (Verlag)

1. Auflage

Erschienen am 27. März 2020

214 Seiten

E-Book

PDF mit Adobe-DRM

Systemvoraussetzungen

978-3-7489-0438-0 (ISBN)

58,00 €inkl. 7% MwSt.

Systemvoraussetzungen

für PDF mit Adobe-DRM

E-Book Einzellizenz

Als Download verfügbar

Beschreibung

Weitere Details

Weitere Ausgaben

Personen

Inhalt

Cover
The Suspect as a Source of Information
I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information?
II. A Brief Journey to the Past
III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial
IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect?
1. Presumption of Innocence
2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination
V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings
1. Non-Controversial Consequences
2. Problem Areas
a) Suspects and Non-Suspects
b) Interrogation
3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence
VI. Concluding Remarks
Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth
I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination
1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule
2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule
II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda
III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth
1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function
2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment
Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany
I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law"
II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics
III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems
1. § 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation
2. § 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent
3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36)
4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789)
5. Actual Policy: § 163g StPO-E
IV. Conclusion
The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation
I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions?
1. Trickery and True Confessions
2. Trickery and False Confessions
3. Detection of False Confessions
II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity?
III. Is Trickery Coercive?
1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive
2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive
3. The Rights Predicate and State Action
4. Summary
IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent?
V. Conclusion
The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability?
I. Introduction
II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method
III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing
1. The misclassification error
2. The coercion error
a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation
b) The use of violence
c) The use of psychological coercion
3. The contamination error
4. Content analysis of the confession
5. Personality traits of the suspect
a) Suggestibility
b) Compliance
6. Conclusion
IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence
1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination
a) Reliability of the statement
b) Autonomy
c) Dignity
d) Conclusion
V. General conclusion
Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice?
1. Introduction
2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice
3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence
4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands
5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence
5.1 Use of trickery
5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique
5.3 Adverse inferences
5.4 Evidentiary presumptions
6. Conclusion
Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View
I. Interrogating the Defendant
1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation
2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court
II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany
1. Statutory and Constitutional Law
2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent
a) Unlawful Promises and Threats
b) Deception and Trickery
c) Severe Infringements of Free Will
III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process
1. Truth: Interpretation of Events
2. The Reality of False Confessions
IV. The Need to Control
1. Videotaping the Interrogation
2. Presence of Defense Counsel
V. Conclusion
References
Abbreviations
Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization
I. Introduction
II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation
III. False Evidence Ploys
(A) Simple Evidence Ploys
(B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys
IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques
V. Conclusion
References
Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019

Systemvoraussetzungen

Als PDF speichern Als Link merken