Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse

Name: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse | Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation
Brand: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Price: 118.99 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation

Frans H. van Eemeren(Autor*in)

John Benjamins Publishing Company

1. Auflage

Erschienen am 19. Mai 2010

XII, 308 Seiten

E-Book

PDF mit Adobe-DRM

Systemvoraussetzungen

978-90-272-8827-1 (ISBN)

118,99 €inkl. 7% MwSt.

Systemvoraussetzungen

für PDF mit Adobe-DRM

E-Book Einzellizenz

Als Download verfügbar

Beschreibung

Weitere Details

Weitere Ausgaben

Person

Inhalt

Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse
Editorial page
Title page
LCC data
Dedication page
Table of contents
Preface
1. Analyzing argumentative discourse
1.1 The scope of reason in argumentative discourse
1.2 Normative pragmatics as a theoretical perspective
1.3 Reconstructing the process of resolving a difference of opinion
1.4 Constructing an analytic overview of argumentative discourse
1.5 Accounting for an analytic overview
1.6 Getting a better grip on argumentative reality
1.7 An extended pragma-dialectical theory
2. Strategic maneuvering between effectiveness and reasonableness
2.1 Defining argumentation theoretically
2.2 Maintaining reasonableness in argumentative discourse
2.3 Aiming for effectiveness in argumentative discourse
2.4 The notion of strategic maneuvering as an analytic instrument
2.5 Strategic maneuvering in the various stages of the resolution process
2.6 Coordinated strategic maneuvering and discussion strategies
2.7 Accounting for strategic maneuvering in the analysis
3. Dialectical and rhetorical perspectives on argumentative discourse
3.1 Diverging meta-theoretical outlooks on dialectic and rhetoric
3.2 Reasonable argumentative discourse in classical dialectical approaches
3.3 Reasonable argumentative discourse in modern dialectical approaches
3.4 Effective argumentative discourse in classical rhetorical approaches
3.5 Effective argumentative discourse in modern rhetorical approaches
3.6 Different views on the relationship between dialectic and rhetoric
3.7 Strategic maneuvering as a concept bridging dialectic and rhetoric
4. Three inseparable aspects of strategic maneuvering
4.1 The strategic maneuvering triangle
4.2 Topical selection in strategic maneuvering
4.3 Theoretical contributions to the analysis of topical selection
4.4 Adaptation to audience demand in strategic maneuvering
4.5 Theoretical contributions to the analysis of adjusting to audience demand
4.6 Presentational choices in strategic maneuvering
4.7 Theoretical contributions to the analysis of presentational choices
5. Strategic maneuvering in conventionalized communicative practices
5.1 Argumentative discourse in different domains of communicative activity
5.2 The theoretical treatment of argumentation in context
5.3 Distinguishing between communicative activity types
5.4 Communicative activity types and the model of a critical discussion
5.5 Characterizing the argumentative features of communicative activity types
5.6 Institutional preconditions for strategic maneuvering
5.7 A case of confrontational strategic maneuvering in the political domain
6. Determining the strategic function of argumentative moves
6.1 Four factors serving as parameters
6.2 A case in point: Shell's advertorial about its role in Nigeria
6.3 The analytic overview as a source for results aspired to
6.4 Dialectical profiles as a source for available routes
6.5 Communicative activity types as a source for institutional constraints
6.6 The argumentative situation as a source for commitment sets
6.7 Analyzing an argumentative move for its strategic function
7. Fallacies as derailments of strategic maneuvering
7.1 Hamblin's criticism of the logical standard treatment
7.2 The need for a comprehensive approach to the fallacies
7.3 Fallacies as violations of rules for critical discussion
7.4 Strategic maneuvering and the deceptiveness of fallacies
7.5 Context-independent criteria for judging fallaciousness
7.6 Context-dependent criteria for judging fallaciousness
7.7 Evaluating the soundness of strategic maneuvers: An example
8. Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof
8.1 The burden of proof as a procedural concept
8.2 Meeting the burden of proof by means of argumentation
8.3 The order of defense in a mixed difference of opinion
8.4 A pragmatic rationale for deciding on the order of defense
8.5 The pragmatic status quo and the order of defense
8.6 Stage-bound maneuvering with the burden of proof
8.7 A case of managing the burden of proof in advertisements
9. Strategic maneuvering in response to presumed inconsistency or fallaciousness
9.1 Logical and pragmatic inconsistencies in a party's avowed commitments
9.2 Tu quoque fallacies as derailments of pointing out inconsistencies
9.3 An accusation of inconsistency case from Dutch politics
9.4 The practical impact of the occurrence of fallacies
9.5 Repairing derailments that do not cancel reasonableness
9.6 Two diverging proposals for dealing with perceived fallacies
9.7 Re-railing repairable derailments of strategic maneuvering
10. Setting up an agenda for further research
10.1 Recapitulating the basics of the extended pragma-dialectical theory
10.2 Maintaining coherence and vitality in the research program
10.3 Reviewing dialectical and rhetorical perspectives philosophically
10.4 Defining types of strategic maneuvering and soundness conditions theoretically
10.5 Describing modes of strategic maneuvering and their effects empirically
10.6 Reconstructing strategic maneuvers and broader strategies analytically
10.7 Characterizing communicative activity types praxeologically
References
Index of names
Index of terms
The series Argumentation in Context

Systemvoraussetzungen

Als PDF speichern Als Link merken