Argumentation in Practice

Name: Argumentation in Practice
Brand: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Price: 155.99 EUR
Availability: OnlineOnly

Frans H. van Eemeren Peter Houtlosser(Herausgeber*in)

John Benjamins Publishing Company

1. Auflage

Erschienen am 22. September 2005

VIII, 368 Seiten

E-Book

PDF mit Adobe-DRM

Systemvoraussetzungen

978-90-272-9424-1 (ISBN)

155,99 €inkl. 7% MwSt.

Systemvoraussetzungen

für PDF mit Adobe-DRM

E-Book Einzellizenz

Als Download verfügbar

Beschreibung

Weitere Details

Weitere Ausgaben

Personen

Inhalt

Argumentation in Practice
Editorial page
Title page
LCC data
Table of contents
Introduction
1. Studying argumentative practice
2. Forms and conceptions of argumentation
3. Empirical studies of argumentative practice
Notes
References
Forms and conceptions of argumentation
``The issue'' in argumentation practice and theory
1. Introduction
2. The issue as a theoretical construct
3. Classroom discussions
4. Public participation at school board meetings
4.1. ``Barbiegate''
4.2. Pragmatic uses of the issue in public participation discourse
5. Normative reflection: Reconstructing interactional problems and situated ideals
Note
References
Hearing is believing
1. The three perspectives
2. A lesson from Whately
3. Bad process
4. A perspectival taxonomy
5. Conclusion
Notes
References
Let's talk
1. Introduction
2. Confrontation
3. The opening stage
4. The argumentation stage
5. Resolution
6. Conclusions
References
Indicators of dissociation
1. Introduction
2. The notion of dissociation
3. How dissociation manifests itself
3.1. Separation
3.2. Negation
3.3. Value
4. Conclusion
Notes
References
A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions
1. Introduction
2. A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions
3. Corpus sample 1: A chat interaction analysis
4. A graphical representation of dialogical argumentation
5. Corpus sample 2: A graphical argumentative interaction
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Notes
References
The argumentative dimension of discourse
1. The scope and limits of argumentation
2. The argumentative dimension of discourse: Case studies
2.1. The case of war testimony
2.2. The case of literary narrative
3. Conclusions
Note
References
Designing premises
1. Introduction
2. Premise design in a forensic setting
3. Premise design in a deliberative setting
4. Conclusion
References
On the pragmatics of argumentative discourse
References
From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again)
1. Introduction
2. Keywords and cultural keywords
3. Corpora, ``discourse'' and argumentation
4. Keywords and topoi in the enthymematic structure of natural language arguments
5. Reshaping meaning: Reason as a keyword in Milton's Areopagitica
6. Conclusions
Notes
References
Sources of examples
Empirical studies of argumentative practice
The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation
1. The French word amalgame
2. Qualifying an argumentation as amalgame is a way of rejecting it as unacceptable
3. Other expressions used for accusing someone of making an amalgame
4. What does the accusation of amalgame refer to?
4.1. An association of two objects x and y on the basis of properties which are presented as shared and conclusive
4.2. The connection between two objects x and y because of a relationship of dependence between them
5. Difficulties in identifying what the accusation of amalgame is about
6. The accusation of amalgame's ``semantic emptying''
7. Conclusion
References
Constructing the (imagined) antagonist in advertising argumentation
1. Introduction: The problem of the imagined antagonist
2. Advertising discourse
2.1. Advertising as an argumentative genre
3. Categorising the addressee
3.1. Inclusion/exclusion
3.2. Implicit and explicit inclusion
3.3. The function of the types
3.4. The `unacknowledged audience'
3.5. Multi-layered applications of the binary
4. Extended example
5. Conclusion
Notes
References
Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices
1. Televised town hall meetings
2. The Simpson verdict controversy as public argument
3. Analytical strategy
4. Analysis of the town meeting structure and argumentation
4.1. Reliance on experts as the voice of the people
4.2. Undeveloped standpoints
5. Conclusions: Competing idealizations of participation in public deliberation
References
Arguments of victims
1. Origin and history of victims' arguments
2. The genre of victim impact arguments
Themes
Stylistics
Speech plans
3. Implications
References
Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics
1. Abductive and coductive inference
2. The 2000 Republican and Democratic Party national conventions
2.1. The Etheridge patriotic montage
2.2. The Republican video on education
3. Abduction, coduction, sentimentality, and political argumentation
Note
References
Appendix A
Lyrics for the Music from the 2000 National Political Conventions (C-Span, 2000
videos available on Gronbeck, 2001)
My Place in This World, Music Performed by Michael W. Smith [1991]
Reparations or separation?
1. ``Be true to what you put on paper'': McPhail's coherence and the rhetoric of racism
2. Of judgments true and righteous altogether: Farrell's coherence and the ethics of rhetoric
3. Rhetoric, reparations, or resignation: The hope(lessness) that race creates
References
Discursive collisions
Notes
References
Aesthetic arguments and civil society
1. The Guildford Four: Art intersects history
2. The argument for conditions of war
3. Debating history through art
4. Conclusion
Notes
References
The use of arguments from perceived opposition in U.S. terrorism policy
1. Arguments from perceived opposition
2. The Carter administration
3. The Reagan administration
4. The Bush administration
5. Implications
References
How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king?
1. Introduction
2. Historical background
2.1. Argumentative discourse in the public sphere of the early Joseon dynasty
2.2. The consensus system of sadaebu
3. Case analysis
3.1. Situational frame of the case
3.2. Phase movement of participants
4. Discussion
Datum: Saheonbu's prime official Yi Chik and the others' sangso
Notes
References
Argument density and argument diversity in the license applications of French provincial printers, 1669-1781
The data
Argumentation theory
A first look at the data
Looking more closely at qualification arguments (Table C)
Family factor arguments (Table D)
Some conclusions
Notes
References
Inventional capacity
1. Theoretical background
2. The empirical record to date
2.1. Operationalization
2.2. The nature of the individual difference
2.3. Situation
2.4. The nature of the repertoires
3. Conclusions
References
The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical freedom rule
1. Introduction
2. Conventional validity and violations of the freedom rule
3. Judgments on fallacies and non-fallacies
4. Judgments on different types of fallacies
5. Politeness as an alternative explanation
6. The type of proposition expressed in the standpoint as an alternative explanation
7. The freedom rule and the `polder' debate
8. Conclusions
Notes
References
Index
the series Controversies

Systemvoraussetzungen

Als PDF speichern Als Link merken