Self-determination in Health Care

Rezensionen / Stimmen

'This book is well-researched and referenced; the analysis is clear and coherent, and the chapters read well together. The hypothesis is lucidly defined and rigorously established; it is an original contribution to scholarship in the field. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.' Remigius N. Nwabueze, University of Southampton, UK 'I am pleased to endorse this book, which explores the subject of consent to medical treatment in an interesting and novel way. The author offers an alternative "property" model as a basis for generating a fresh understanding of the subject in the new climate of greater deference to patient choice. The book will be a valuable contribution to knowledge in this field.' Vivienne Harpwood, Cardiff University, UK "Edozien argues that the generally accepted method of ensuring self-determination by medical patients-that of securing the patient's consent-is ineffective. He argues instead for a property model, where the patients' bodily integrity is protected from unauthorized invasion, and their legitimate expectation to be provided with the relevant information to make an informed decision is taken to be a property right."
Law and Social Inquiry Journal

"Edozien's book represents a comprehensive and rigorous piece of original research. His argument that the consent model is inadequate as a legal mechanism and ethical justification is compelling and the book is structured to ensure it has maximum impact. The book is easy to follow and accessible to readers who may not have extensive prior knowledge of the field... Edozien's book lends weight to calls for reform in this area and adds further colour to the palette of options at policymakers' disposal."

Medical Law International, 2017, Vol. 17(3) 219-223

"[T]he way in which Edozien handles his argument is to be commended, for it is illuminating about the possibilities and the issues with the current consent model, legally, ethically and, possibly more importantly, the way in which it is operationalised in health-care practice. It certainly adds, in a positive manner, to the rich debate on consent in health care.

Medical Law Review, Vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-6