Using case law, this book explores the controversial issues associated with excited or hyperactive delirium with severe agitation, including the appropriate use of tasers, and the inhumane practice of applying bodyweight pressure on subjects by placing them face down in the prone position, depriving them of the ability to breathe.
This study alerts society to the urgent need to treat excited delirium as a medical emergency, rather than a crime scene where a multi-agency collaborative effort can deescalate and manage these hyperthermic and paranoid individuals allowing them an opportunity to live. It also argues that the reaction of some US states, that are prohibiting the term 'excited delirium' and preventing officers from getting adequately trained, can have devastating results by increasing municipal liability for failure to train. It also fails those individuals undergoing serious mental health crises by way of excited delirium or seizures, who need to be served and protected as per the social contract theory.
Legal Implications of Taser Use and Prone Position on Excited Delirium Subjects will be of interest to legislators, attorneys, judges, police agencies, correctional facilities, and graduate level students in criminal justice, law, and the social sciences.
Rezensionen / Stimmen
'Legal Implications of Taser Use and Prone Position on Excited Delirium Subjects is an important addition to the scholarship on excessive force and police practices. Through detailed explanations and examples of excited delirium, Professor Vidisha Barua Worley illustrates the dangers of police practices that ignore the potential injury to arrestees and incarcerated people. Further, she examines the law as it relates to use of force, the potential for liability, and the legal hurdles that must be overcome to bring a lawsuit against the police when force is excessive. This book should be mandatory reading for police officers and those who train them, as well as legislators and judges who consider cases and legal restrictions related to use of force.'
Justin Brooks, Professor of Practice, University of San Diego School of Law, Author of You Might Go to Prison, Even Though You're Innocent.
'This book provides a timely and unflinching look at taser use, prone restraint, and the dubious legacy of excited delirium. Drawing on case law, medical insight, and real-world events, it challenges deeply entrenched practices with clarity and conviction. A must-read for policymakers.'
Robert M. Worley, Professor of Criminal Justice, Lamar University.
Reihe
Sprache
Verlagsort
Verlagsgruppe
Zielgruppe
Für höhere Schule und Studium
Postgraduate and Undergraduate Advanced
Maße
Höhe: 234 mm
Breite: 156 mm
ISBN-13
978-1-032-70381-7 (9781032703817)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Klassifikation
Vidisha Barua Worley is Professor of Criminal Justice at Lamar University, USA, Editor-in-Chief of the Lamar University Division of Criminal Justice Newsletter, and an attorney licensed in New York, U.S.A. and in India. In 2016, Dr. Worley with her co-author Dr. Robert Michael Worley came up with the theory, the Economics of Crossing Over, which explains why some correctional officers cross over to the side of the inmates. The Support for Inmate Mistreatment Scale created by Drs. Robert Worley, Vidisha Worley, and Eric Lambert (2021) has been added to the list of psychological tests by the American Psychological Association.
1.Excited Delirium: A Myth or Reality. 2.The Controversial Taser: History, Legal Standards, and Guidelines. 3.Municipal Liability for Inappropriate Taser Use by Police Officers. 4.Taser Use by Police: Individual Officer Liability. 5.Taser Use on Pre-Trial Detainees. 6.Taser Use by Correctional Officers. 7.Taser's Place in the Use of Force Continuum. 8.Excited Delirium, Prone Position, Hog-Tying, and Sudden Deaths. 9.Taser Use and Prone Position involving Excited Delirium Subjects. 10.Conclusion.
