Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts

Rezensionen / Stimmen

This is a work of scholarly statecraft: it aims both to persuade readers globally of the importance and lessons of these Asian cases for theorizing about the relationship between judicial review and democracy globally, and to persuade common law Asian judges to follow the path set out by Tew herself...We can only hope that, like Tew, they are up to the task. * Mark Rush, Washington and Lee University, 31 Law and Politics Book Review * Tew raises questions about western notions of constitutionalism while presenting fresh insights into Southeast Asian judiciaries. It's an insightful work that belongs on the bookshelves of all comparative scholars. * Rehan Abeyratne, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Asian Journal of Comparative Law * Overall, this book provides a rich account of the judicial role within the broader political and cultural context in these two countries. It will be of great interest to scholars of comparative constitutionalism in Asia and beyond. One can only hope that Tew's optimism for historically passive courts to become 'partners in the enterprise of statecraft' proves correct. * Ming-Sung Kuo, University of Warwick, I-CONnect * Tew excels in pointing the way forward especially for the Malaysian judiciary since the unexpected loss of the BN regime in 2018. Indeed, her contribution specifically in 'Balancing Security and Liberty' (chapter 8) has been cited with approval by the Malaysian Federal Court in its recent judgment. If anything, this shows that her notion of strategic assertiveness is really happening in Malaysia. * Muhammad Afiq Bin Baharum, Law & Justice * Ultimately...this is a work of scholarly statecraft: it aims both to persuade readers globally of the importance and lessons of these Asian cases for theorizing about the relationship between judicial review and democracy globally, and to persuade common law Asian judges to follow the path set out by Tew herself... We can only hope that, like Tew, they are up to the task. * Professor Rosalind Dixon, JOTWELL * With Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts Yvonne Tew has written a book that will be impossible to ignore in any serious discussion about constitutional democracy in the parts of Asia her pen touches. She writes with clarity, sensitivity, and skill as she casts a sharp analytical light into the heart of several common law jurisdictions. * Christopher Forsyth, Emeritus Sir David Williams Professor of Public Law, University of Cambridge * Can law and constitutional institutions shore up the world's new democracies? Professor Yvonne Tew provides the most comprehensive national account of efforts to impose political and legal accountability in one-party states that claim an electoral mandate. A fascinating tale of the transition of Asian courts from constricted constitutionalism to dynamic constitutional statecraft. Not only the definitive work on Malaysia, but an indispensable addition to comparative constitutionalism. * Samuel Issacharoff, Reiss Professor of Law, New York University School of Law * Professor Yvonne Tew's book contains a scintillating and lucid account of how courts in Malaysia and Singapore navigate politically sensitive terrains to buttress the spirit of constitutionalism. An impressive work of scholarship. * H. P. Lee, Emeritus Professor, Monash University * Professor Tew's evaluation of judicial contributions to building constitutionalism in Malaysia and Singapore provides a dynamic, richly contextual understanding of contested ideas and institutions. This fascinating, perceptive, timely, and forward-looking study deserves to be read by anyone with an interest in constitutionalism, the interplay of judicial and political statecraft, or constitutional politics in Asia. * David Feldman, Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of English Law, University of Cambridge * Constitutional Statecraft in Asian Courts is a refreshing work of comparative scholarship in which Yvonne Tew offers insights into constitutional development in Singapore and Malaysia. In so doing, she offers important insights into the comparative study of judiciaries and perspectives on the role of courts and notions of the rule of law that westerners in general and Americans in particular will find challenging and enlightening. * Mark Rush, Law and Politics Book Review *