This Element shows that Plato keeps a clear distinction between mathematical and metaphysical realism and the knife he uses to slice the difference is method. The philosopher's dialectical method requires that we tether the truth of hypotheses to existing metaphysical objects. The mathematician's hypothetical method, by contrast, takes hypotheses as if they were first principles, so no metaphysical account of their truth is needed. Thus, we come to Plato's methodological as-if realism: in mathematics, we treat our hypotheses as if they were first principles, and, consequently, our objects as if they existed, and we do this for the purpose of solving problems. Taking the road suggested by Plato's Republic, this Element shows that methodological commitments to mathematical objects are made in light of mathematical practice; foundational considerations; and, mathematical applicability. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Rezensionen / Stimmen
'... Landry's response to the Platonic call for collaboration with his text opens up the possibility of very fruitful debates.' Susanna Saracco, Metascience
Reihe
Sprache
Verlagsort
Produkt-Hinweis
Illustrationen
Worked examples or Exercises
Maße
Höhe: 224 mm
Breite: 148 mm
Dicke: 7 mm
Gewicht
ISBN-13
978-1-009-31378-0 (9781009313780)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Klassifikation
Autor*in
University of California, Davis
1. Introduction; 2. The interprative lay of the land; 3. The divided line; 4. Book 7; 5. The good in mathematics; 6. Mathematics versus metaphysics; References.