Dawkins examines the forces that made the nude a contentious image in the early Third Republic. Analyzing the evolving relationship between the fine-art nude, print culture and censorship, Heather Dawkins explores how artists, art critics, politicians, bureaucrats, lawyers, and judges evaluated the nude. She shows how spectatorship of the nude was refracted through the ideals of art, femininity, republican liberty, and public decency. An art form made for and by men, the nude was rarely the subject of serious engagement on the part of women. A few, nevertheless, attempted to take up the issues and challenges of the nude. Dawkins investigates in detail how these women reshaped the genre of the nude and its spectatorship in order for it to accommodate their own experience and subjectivity.
Rezensionen / Stimmen
'An erudite, insightful account ... a fascinating, revealing examination of an exciting time in art.' Antiques Magazine
Sprache
Verlagsort
Zielgruppe
Illustrationen
38 Halftones, unspecified; 22 Line drawings, unspecified
Maße
Höhe: 260 mm
Breite: 183 mm
Dicke: 18 mm
Gewicht
ISBN-13
978-0-521-80755-5 (9780521807555)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Klassifikation
Autor*in
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Introduction; 1. Decency in dispute: viewing the nude; 2. Modelling another view: posing for the nude; 3. Improper appreciation: women and the fine art of the nude; 4. A defiant imagination: Marie de Montifaud, censorship, and the nude; Epilogue.
