
Essential Cases on Damage
Beschreibung
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
The increasing Europeanisation of the law of delict/torts has produced textbooks, casebooks, monographs, and also sets of model rules of a genuinely European character. A major gap still existing today relates to the experiences gathered in the national legal systems over the past decades. The present work attempts to fill this gap for one key element of tort law: the notion of damage. It thus does what the previous volume in the 'Digest of European Tort Law' series did for another key element, ie natural causation. Once again, the publication contains a selection of the most important cases decided in
26 states across Europe as well as by the European Court of Justice. For each case the facts and the relevant court decision are presented, and the decision is analysed within the wider context of the development of the respective legal system. In addition, the editors provide comparative analyses of the case law reported in this volume concerning all the specific problems raised under the heading of damage. The publication also looks into how key cases would be resolved under the European model rules drafted in the field of tort law; and it also highlights cases from earlier periods of legal history.
The editors believe that the material gathered here may provide guidance for an organic convergence of the national legal systems in Europe. It constitutes the basis of an acquis commun that is infinitely richer (though also much more complex) than the rather bland and abstract concepts contained in national codifications, European legislation, and the modern model rules.
Weitere Details
Weitere Ausgaben
Andere Ausgaben


Personen
Inhalt
- Intro
- Preface
- Overview
- Abbreviations
- Questionnaire Structure
- Questionnaire
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. PECUNIARY DAMAGE
- III. NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE
- IV. BORDERLINE CASES
- V. SPECIFIC SITUATIONS
- VI. OTHERS
- 1. General Overview
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 2. Objective Value
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 3. Subjective Value
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 20. Latvia
- 22. Poland
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 4. Loss of Working Capacity
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 5. Primary and Consequential Damage
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 6. Positive Damage and Loss of Profit
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 7. Loss of Illicit Profits
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 8. Damage without any Material Alteration
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 9. Reliance and Expectation Loss
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 10. Alteration of a Good or Diminution of its Value
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 11. Non-Pecuniary Damage in General
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 12. Non-Pecuniary Consequential Damage
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 13. Non-Pecuniary Damage without Harm
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report (Categories 11-13)
- 14. Value of Affection
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 24. Slovakia
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 15. Loss of Enjoyment
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 16. Frustration
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 17. Loss of Use
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 18. 'Grey Area' between Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Damage
- 3. Austria
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 10. Spain
- 13. Scotland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 19. Additional Categories Apart from Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Loss
- 5. Greece
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 20. Wrongful Conception
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 19. Estonia
- 23. Czech Republic
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 21. Wrongful Birth
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 22. Wrongful Life
- 2. Germany
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 23. Environmental Damage
- 2. Germany
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 24. Collective Damage
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 25. Mere Exposure to a Danger
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 26. Loss of a Chance as Damage
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 27. Further Categories
- 16. Norway
- 23. Czech Republic
- 28. Others
- 4. Switzerland
- Contributors
- Index
- Publications
Systemvoraussetzungen
Dateiformat: PDF
Kopierschutz: Wasserzeichen-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
Systemvoraussetzungen:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Verwenden Sie zum Lesen die kostenlose Software Adobe Reader, Adobe Digital Editions oder einen anderen PDF-Viewer Ihrer Wahl (siehe E-Book Hilfe).
- Tablet/Smartphone (Android; iOS): Installieren Sie bereits vor dem Download die kostenlose App Adobe Digital Editions oder die App PocketBook (siehe E-Book Hilfe).
- E-Book-Reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino u.v.a.m.
Das Dateiformat PDF zeigt auf jeder Hardware eine Buchseite stets identisch an. Daher ist eine PDF auch für ein komplexes Layout geeignet, wie es bei Lehr- und Fachbüchern verwendet wird (Bilder, Tabellen, Spalten, Fußnoten). Bei kleinen Displays von E-Readern oder Smartphones sind PDF leider eher nervig, weil zu viel Scrollen notwendig ist. Mit Wasserzeichen-DRM wird hier ein „weicher” Kopierschutz verwendet. Daher ist technisch zwar alles möglich – sogar eine unzulässige Weitergabe. Aber an sichtbaren und unsichtbaren Stellen wird der Käufer des E-Books als Wasserzeichen hinterlegt, sodass im Falle eines Missbrauchs die Spur zurückverfolgt werden kann.
Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer E-Book Hilfe.