
Competition Law in Romania
Beschreibung
Lawyers who handle transnational commercial transactions will appreciate the explanation of fundamental differences in procedure from one legal system to another, as well as the international aspects of competition law. Throughout the book, the treatment emphasizes enforcement, with relevant cases analysed where appropriate. An informative introductory chapter provides detailed information on the economic, legal, and historical background, including national and international sources, scope of application, an overview of substantive provisions and main notions, and a comprehensive description of the enforcement system including private enforcement. The book proceeds to a detailed analysis of substantive prohibitions, including cartels and other horizontal agreements, vertical restraints, the various types of abusive conduct by the dominant firms and the appraisal of concentrations, and then goes on to the administrative enforcement of competition law, with a focus on the antitrust authorities' powers of investigation and the right of defence of suspected companies. This part also covers voluntary merger notifications and clearance decisions, as well as a description of the judicial review of administrative decisions.
Its succinct yet scholarly nature, as well as the practical quality of the information it provides, make this book a valuable time-saving tool for business and legal professionals alike. Lawyers representing parties with interests in Romania will welcome this very useful guide, and academics and researchers will appreciate its value in the study of international and comparative competition law.
Weitere Details
Weitere Ausgaben
Inhalt
- Cover
- Half Title Page
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- The Authors
- Table of Contents
- List of Abbreviations
- General Introduction
- §1. GENERAL BACKGROUND OF THE COUNTRY
- §2. THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM
- §3. THE LEGAL SYSTEM
- §4. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF ANTITRUST LAW
- Part I. The Structure of Antitrust Law and Its Enforcement
- Chapter 1. Sources of Antitrust Law
- §1. NATIONAL SOURCES
- §2. INTERNATIONAL SOURCES
- I. Commission's Regulations
- II. Commission's Guidelines
- §3. SECONDARY SOURCES
- I. Regulations
- II. Guidelines
- §4. SOURCES' RELATION AND HIERARCHY
- §5. ROLE AND AUTHORITY OF PRECEDENTS
- Chapter 2. Scope of Application
- §1. TERRITORIAL REACH
- §2. SPECIAL SECTORS
- I. Motor Vehicles
- II. Telecommunications
- III. Insurance
- IV. Transport
- §3. STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES
- I. Public Undertakings
- II. Public Utilities
- III. Postal Services
- IV. Electricity
- §4. SENSIBLE EFFECT AND DE MINIMIS
- Chapter 3. Overview of Substantive Provisions
- §1. RESTRICTIVE AGREEMENTS
- §2. DOMINANT UNDERTAKINGS
- §3. CONCENTRATIONS
- §4. OTHER PROHIBITIONS
- §5. TESTS OF ILLEGALITY
- I. Per Se Prohibitions and Naked Restrictions
- II. Balancing Tests
- III. Merger Tests
- Chapter 4. Overview of Main Notions
- §1. UNDERTAKING
- §2. RELEVANT MARKET
- §3. MARKET POWER/DOMINANT POSITION
- §4. AGREEMENTS AND CONCERTED PRACTICES
- §5. RESTRICTION OF COMPETITION
- §6. MONOPOLIZATION AND ABUSE OF DOMINANCE
- §7. CONCENTRATIONS
- §8. JOINT VENTURES
- Chapter 5. Consequences of Violations and Enforcement Institutions
- §1. ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT
- I. The Antitrust Authorities
- A. Formation, Composition
- B. Investigating Powers
- C. Adjudicating Powers (Ascertaining and Sanctioning)
- D. Other Institutional Tasks (Consultancy to Parliament/Government)
- II. Government Direct Enforcement Activities
- III. Other Administrative Agencies Applying Antitrust Rules
- IV. Administrative Fines
- A. Method of Setting the Fines Imposed Pursuant to Articles 51 and 52 of the Competition Law
- B. Method of Setting Fines Imposed Pursuant to Article 53 of the Competition Law
- C. Acknowledgement of the Infringement
- D. Inability to Pay
- E. Fine Imposed on an Association of Undertakings
- F. Periodic Penalty Payments
- G. Payment of Fines
- H. Leniency Policy
- I. Immunity from Fines
- J. Type A Immunity
- K. Type B Immunity
- L. Reduction of Fine
- M. Procedural Aspects
- 1. Formal Applications for Immunity
- 2. Application for a Marker
- 3. Other Procedural Aspects
- V. Administrative Injunctions and Other Restrictive Orders
- VI. Interim Measures
- A. Prima Facie Infringement
- B. Urgency Due to the Risk of Serious and Irreparable Damage to Competition
- C. Nature and Characteristics of Interim Measures
- D. Procedure and Appeal
- §2. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT
- I. Competent Civil Courts
- II. Sanctions
- A. Nullity
- B. Damages
- 1. Types of Antitrust Matters Where Private Actions Are Available
- 2. Admissible Evidence
- 3. Collective Actions
- 4. Limitation Period
- 5. Compensation Granted
- C. Interim Measures
- §3. CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT
- I. Criminal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations
- II. Other Application of Criminal Law to Relevant Conducts
- III. Role of Prosecutors
- IV. Competent Criminal Courts
- Part II. The Application of the Prohibitions
- Chapter 1. Restrictive Agreements
- §1. HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS
- I. Cartels
- A. Price Fixing
- 1. The 2014 ROREC and ECOTIC Cases - Price Fixing within Buy-Back Campaigns
- 2. The 2010 Timisoara Taxi Case - First Leniency Case
- 3. The 2010 Body of Expert and Licensed Accountant (BELAR Association) Case - Highest Ever Percentage of Fine Applied by the Competition Council (9.2%)
- 4. The 2008 National Association of Dental Technicians (NADT) Case - Concerted Practice within an Association
- 5. The 2012 Private Pensions Case - The Price Fixing Alleged by the Statement of Objections Not Held by the Plenum of the Competition Council
- 6. The 2005 Cement Case - The Biggest Price Fixing Cartel Case, Annulled by the Court Insofar as One of the Undertakings Was Concerned
- 7. The 2004 Meal Tickets Case - An Example of the Regulatory Authority's Determining Involvement
- 8. The 2005 Association of Ship-Owners and River Harbours Operators Case - Combination of Horizontal and Vertical Agreement
- 9. The 2005 National Union of Real Estate Agencies (NUREA) - Decision of an Association
- B. Market/Client Allocation
- 1. The 2010 Private Pensions Case - An Example of Regulatory Failure on a New Market and the First Case Ascertaining Breach of the TFEU
- 2. The 2006 Cable Television Services Case - Annulment in Court Due to Prescription Rules
- C. Production/Innovation Limitation
- 1. The 2011 Oil Companies Case - Highest Fine for Breach of Article 5 and the Debate on the Standard of Proof (Agreement/Concerted Practice)
- D. Group Boycott
- 1. The 2014 Romanian Media Club Case: First Group Boycott Ever Sanctioned by the Competition Council
- 2. The 2012 Medicine Importers and Distributors Association and the Medicine Distributors Association in Romania Case - The Exchange Rate Freezing by the Ministry of Health and the Distributors' 'Strike'
- E. Collusion on Other Objects
- 1. The 2013 Romanian Weapons Department Bid Rigging Case
- 2. The 2010 Baile Olanesti Bid Rigging Case
- 3. The 2008 Dialysis Bid Rigging Case (Fresenius Medical Care, Alsifcom Intermed and Opremi Medfarm)
- 4. The 2002 Privatization Bid Rigging Case
- 5. The 2012 TRANSGAZ Bid Rigging Cases
- 6. The 2015 ROMGAZ Bid Rigging Case
- 7. The 2012 CNADNR Bid Rigging Case
- 8. The 2012 National Union of Bailiffs Case - Raising Artificial Barriers to Entry on the Market
- II. Information Exchange Practices
- III. Cooperation Agreements
- A. Research and Development
- B. Specialization
- C. Standardization
- D. Joint Production
- E. Joint Purchasing
- F. Joint Selling
- 1. The 2011 Case of Football TV Rights and the First Application of the Commitments Procedure
- §2. VERTICAL AGREEMENTS
- I. Distribution
- A. Resale Price Maintenance
- 1. The 2013 Case on the Dental Products Market: Maximum Discount Levels
- 2. The 2013 Case on the Polystyrene Adhesives and Mortars Market: Minimum Mark-Ups
- 3. The 2012 Fornetti Case: Commitments in Order to Alleviate Competition Concerns Relating to Potential Price Fixing within a Franchise Agreement
- 4. The 2012 Case on the Telecommunication Market - Commitments by Orange, Vodafone and Cosmote, Undertaken in Order to Alleviate Concerns Related to: Resale Price Maintenance, Market Allocation and Non-compete Obligations
- 5. The 2011 Case on the Market of Commercialization of Fruits and Vegetables in Bucharest (Interfruct, Albinuta and Profi)
- 6. The 2005 Wrigley Case on Resale Price Maintenance and Market and Customers Allocation
- B. Exclusive Distributorship
- 1. The 2004 Kandia Case
- 2. The 2004 Renault Case
- 3. The 2004 Rompak Case
- 4. The 2004 Philip Morris Case
- 5. The 2005 Colgate Palmolive Case
- 6. The 2005 Wrigley Case
- 7. The 2011 Productie Zarah Moden Case
- 8. The 2011 Belupo Case - Export Restrictions on the Pharmaceutical Market
- 9. The 2011 Bayer Case - Export Restrictions on the Pharmaceutical Market
- C. Exclusive Dealing
- 1. The 2004 Sicomed Case
- 2. The Insulin Case
- 3. The 2013 Video-Lottery Case
- D. Selective Distribution
- E. Franchising
- II. Technology Licensing
- A. Patent Licensing
- B. Trademark Licensing
- C. Know-How and Trade Secret Licensing
- Chapter 2. Dominant Undertakings' Prohibited Practices
- §1. EXPLOITATIVE PRACTICES
- I. Excessive/Unfair Pricing/Imposing Other Unfair Trading Terms
- A. The 2005 Cement Case - The First Allegation of Abuse of Collective Dominance (Imposition of Excessive Prices on the Grey Cement Relevant Market)
- B. The 2004 Kronospan Case - Abuse of Dominance by Imposition of Excessive/ Unfair Prices on the Wood Panel Products Market, Following Merger Clearance
- C. The 2010 Romanian National Post Company (CNPR) Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Excessive Pricing - One of the Most Detailed Analysis on Excessive Pricing in the Competition Council Decisions
- D. The 2006 Astral Telecom and Cablevision Case - Abuse of Dominance by Excessive Prices on the Cable TV Services Market
- E. The 2003 National Company Romanian Tobacco (SNTR) Case - Abuse of Dominance by Imposition of Excessive Prices and Discrimination on the Cigarettes Market in Romania
- F. The 1999 Romanian Shareholders Registry Case - Abuse of Dominance by Imposition of Unfair Trading Terms and Refusal to Deal on the Relevant Market of Registry Services on the Extra-Stock Market
- G. The 2010 Actavis v. Novartis Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Imposition of Excessive/Unfair Prices on the Pharma Market - Considerations on Excessive Pricing Involving Intellectual Property Rights
- H. The 2004 Petrom Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Imposition of Excessive/Unfair Prices on the Oil Market
- I. The 2011 Prefab v. Lafarge Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Excessive Pricing on the Cement Market - Detailed Analysis of Relevant Market Definition
- J. The 2012 Central Depository Case: Commitments in Order to Alleviate Concerns regarding a Potential Market Foreclosure (Excessive Pricing and Unfair Trading Terms)
- K. The 2012 PROGAZ Case: Commitments in Order to Remove Concerns regarding Potential Excessive Prices and Discriminatory Conditions Imposed by a Company Holding a Natural Monopoly Position
- II. Discrimination
- A. The 2010 Romanian National Post Company (CNPR) Case - Abuse of Dominance by Discrimination on the Postal Market - Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Discrimination
- B. The 1999 Romanian Shareholders Registry Case - Abuse of Dominance by Discrimination, Unfair Trading Terms and Refusal to Deal on the Relevant Market of Registry Services on the Extra-Stock Market
- C. The 2003 National Company Romanian Tobacco (SNTR) Case - Abuse of Dominance by Discrimination and Imposition of Excessive Prices on the Cigarettes Market in Romania
- D. The 2014 Traian Vuia Airport Commitments to Address Alleged Concerns of Discrimination and Exploitation of State of Economic Dependence
- §2. EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICES
- I. Predation
- A. The 2007 TPSUT Case - Allegation of Predatory Prices in Offers in Auctions on the Market of Lease of Constructions Equipment and Demolition Services
- II. Tying
- III. Rebates
- A. The 2008 Com Nico Serv v. Michelin Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance on the Market for Distribution of Auto Tyres for Cars - Rebates
- IV. Refusal to Deal
- A. The 2011 Netmaster v. Orange Romania Case - Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Deal on the Calls Termination Market
- B. The 2011 Netmaster v. Vodafone Romania Case - Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Deal on the Calls Termination Market
- C. The 2012 Netmaster v. Romtelecom Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Deal on the Calls Termination Market
- D. The 2011 Astral Telecom v. Romtelecom and Electrica Dobrogea Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Deal on the Market of the Service of Access to the Associated Infrastructure - Poles
- E. The 2006 National Company for Freight Railway Transport (CFR Marfã) Case - Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Supply and Discrimination on the Freight Rail Transport Market
- F. The 1999 Romanian Shareholders Registry Case - Abuse of Dominance by Refusal to Deal and Imposition of Unfair Trading Terms on the Relevant Market of Registry Services on the Extra-Stock Market
- V. Price Squeeze
- VI. Exploitation of Economic Dependence
- A. The 2014 CEZ Commitments on the Electricity Distribution Market
- B. The 2011 Prefab v. Lafarge Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Exploitation of Economic Dependence on the Cement Market
- C. The 2011 Astral Telecom v. Romtelecom and Electrica Dobrogea Case - Allegation of Abuse of Dominance by Exploitation of Economic Dependence on the Market of the Service of Access to the Associated Infrastructure - Poles
- D. The 2014 Traian Vuia Airport Commitments to Address Alleged Concerns of Discrimination and Exploitation of State of Economic Dependence
- Chapter 3. Concentrations
- §1. HORIZONTAL MERGERS
- I. The 2004 OMV/Petrom Merger on the Oil Market - Commitments
- II. The 2004 Kronospan/Sepal Merger on the Market of Simple and Laminated MDF
- III. The 2007 Kronospan/Constantia Merger on the Market of Raw and Coated Particle Boards
- IV. The 2010 Lidl Romania/Plus Romania and TREI Romania Merger on the Retail Market for Food and Non-food Products
- V. The 2011 Fresenius/Renamed and Nefromed Merger on the Market of Dialysis Services - Structural Remedies
- VI. The 2013 Auchan/Real Merger on the Retail Market - Behavioural Commitments
- VII. The 2013 Burda/SHR Merger on Magazines Sector - Divestitures
- §2. VERTICAL MERGERS
- I. The 2004 Lafarge/SICIM Merger on the Market for Port Services
- II. The 2011 Fresenius/Renamed and Nefromed Merger on the Market of Dialysis Products
- §3. MARKET/PRODUCT EXTENSION MERGERS
- I. The 2010 Interbrands/Wella Romania Merger on the Markets for Professional and Consumer Hair Care Products
- §4. PURE CONGLOMERATE MERGERS
- §5. JOINT VENTURES
- Part III. Administrative Procedure
- Chapter 1. Administrative Investigations before the Antitrust Authority
- §1. INITIATIVE
- I. General Sector Inquiries
- II. Ex Officio Investigations
- III. Complaints
- A. Admissibility of Complaints: Object
- B. Admissibility of Complaints: Legitimate Interest
- C. Filling in the Complaint Form
- D. Assessment of Complaints
- E. The Rejection of a Complaint
- F. Procedural Rights of the Complainant
- §2. POWERS
- I. Request for Information
- II. Investigating and Search Powers
- A. Powers of Inspection
- B. Dawn Raids
- C. Legal Privilege
- III. Cooperation with Other State Institutions
- §3. RIGHT OF DEFENCE
- I. The Proceedings: Hearings, Access to File, Briefs
- A. Hearings
- B. Access to File
- C. Access to File: Persons Who Have Access to the File
- D. Access to File: Available Information
- E. Access to File: Unavailable Information
- F. How the Access to the File Is Provided
- G. When Access to the File Is Granted
- H. The Access to the File of the Complainant
- I. Providing Documents to Other Parties Involved in the Merger Proceedings
- J. Providing Documents in Specific Situations Determined by Law
- II. Statement of Objections
- III. Final Hearing and Decision
- Chapter 2. Voluntary Notifications and Clearance Decisions
- §1. PRIOR NOTIFICATIONS OF AGREEMENTS/UNILATERAL CONDUCTS
- §2. INFORMAL GUIDANCE LETTERS
- Chapter 3. Merger Control
- §1. PRELIMINARY FILING OBLIGATIONS
- I. Criteria and Thresholds
- II. Turnover Calculation
- III. Market Share Calculation
- IV. Other Relevant Notions
- A. Obligation to Notify
- B. Simplified Procedure
- C. Ancillary Restrictions
- §2. STRUCTURE OF PROCEEDINGS
- I. Preliminary Assessment and Full Investigation
- II. Time Framework
- III. Right of Defence
- A. Right to Be Heard
- B. Right of Access to the File
- §3. CLEARANCE AND CONDITIONAL CLEARANCE
- I. Conditions and Undertakings
- A. Content of the Remedies
- 1. Divestiture of a Business to a Suitable Purchaser
- 2. Divestiture of a Viable and Competitive Business
- 3. Transfer to a Suitable Purchaser
- 4. Removal of Links with Competitors
- 5. Other Remedies
- B. Timing and Procedure
- §4. RELATIONS WITH OTHER MERGER CONTROL AUTHORITIES
- I. Other Authorities within the Local Jurisdiction
- II. International Coordination
- Chapter 4. Challenging of the Administrative Decision
- §1. COMPETENT COURTS
- §2. TIME LIMITS
- §3. SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
- Selected Bibliography
- Index
- Back Cover
Systemvoraussetzungen
Dateiformat: PDF
Kopierschutz: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
Systemvoraussetzungen:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Installieren Sie bereits vor dem Download die kostenlose Software Adobe Digital Editions (siehe E-Book Hilfe).
- Tablet/Smartphone (Android; iOS): Installieren Sie bereits vor dem Download die kostenlose App Adobe Digital Editions oder die App PocketBook (siehe E-Book Hilfe).
- E-Book-Reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino u.v.a.m. (nicht Kindle)
Das Dateiformat PDF zeigt auf jeder Hardware eine Buchseite stets identisch an. Daher ist eine PDF auch für ein komplexes Layout geeignet, wie es bei Lehr- und Fachbüchern verwendet wird (Bilder, Tabellen, Spalten, Fußnoten). Bei kleinen Displays von E-Readern oder Smartphones sind PDF leider eher nervig, weil zu viel Scrollen notwendig ist.
Mit Adobe-DRM wird hier ein „harter” Kopierschutz verwendet. Wenn die notwendigen Voraussetzungen nicht vorliegen, können Sie das E-Book leider nicht öffnen. Daher müssen Sie bereits vor dem Download Ihre Lese-Hardware vorbereiten.
Bitte beachten Sie: Wir empfehlen Ihnen unbedingt nach Installation der Lese-Software diese mit Ihrer persönlichen Adobe-ID zu autorisieren!
Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer E-Book Hilfe.