Introduction- Leslie Willcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART VI.
DESIGN SCIENCE APPROACHES.-
Chapter 19: McKay, J.,
Marshall, P., and Hirschheim, R. (2012), "The design construct in information
systems design science," JIT, Vol.
27, pp. 125-139.- Chapter 20: Arnott, D., and
Pervan, G., (2014) "A critical analysis of decision support systems research
revisited: the rise of design science," JIT,
Vol 29, pp. 269-293.- Chapter 21: Hanseth, O., and
Lyytinen, K. (2010), "Design theory for dynamic complexity in information
infrastructures: the case of building the internet." JIT, Vol. 25, pp. 1-19.- Chapter 22: Heinrich, L., and
Riedi, R. (2013), "Understanding the dominance and advocacy of the
design-oriented research approach in the business informatics community: a
history-based examination," JIT, Vol.
28, pp. 34-49.- Chapter 23: Salmela, H. (2008),
"Analysing business losses caused byinformation systems risk: a business
process analysis approach," JIT, Vol.
23, pp. 185-202.- PART VI. ALTERNATIVE
APPROACHES.- Chapter 24: Price, R., and
Shanks, G. (2005), "A semiotic information quality framework: development and
comparative analysis," JIT, Vol. 20,
pp. 88-120.- Chapter 25: Merali, Y. (2006),
"Complexity and Information Systems: the emergent domain," JIT, Vol. 21. Pp. 216-228.- Chapter 26: Wilson, M. (2004),
"A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research," JIT, Vol. 19, pp. 81-92.
