Do scientists exaggarate potential benefit from their work? Do animal advocates exaggerate the suffering of animals? What, if any, regulations should society impose upon animal work? Is a compromise between animal advocates and researchers possible or desirable? Four essayists with contrasting views and perspectives reflect on the issues and dilemmas.
Reihe
Sprache
Verlagsort
Verlagsgruppe
Zielgruppe
Für höhere Schule und Studium
Für Beruf und Forschung
Produkt-Hinweis
Maße
Höhe: 195 mm
Breite: 128 mm
Dicke: 8 mm
Gewicht
ISBN-13
978-0-340-85733-5 (9780340857335)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Klassifikation
The Institute of Ideas's mission is to bring fresh ideas to the public arena on the key debates of our time. The IoI aims to be an agenda-setting organization prepared to think the unthinkable and encourage others to do likewise. The IoI is committed to forging a space where ideas can be contested without constraint, and where the clash of ideas is recognized as integral to the process of knowledge expansion. Editor (from the Institute of Ideas): Tony Gilland Contributors: h Dr Richard Ryder is a high profile animal rights campaigner in the UK h Dr Mark Matfield is the Executive Director of the Research Defense Society h Dr Stuart Derbyshire is an Assistant Professor at the Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition at the University of Pittsburgh h Tom Regan is Professor of Philosophy at North Carolina State University.
Preface; Notes on the Contributors; Introduction; Afterword; 1 - Animal Experiments: Medical Progress and Animal Rights Protests; 2 - Empty Cages: Animal Rights and Vivisection; 3 - Why Animals' Rights are Wrong; 4 - Institutional Speciesism: Cruelty is Wrong
