
Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Table of Contents
- Detailed Table of Contents
- Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- §1 Force Majeure and Hardship in International Commercial Transactions
- I The Need for Transnational Instead of Domestic Rules in the Context of International Commercial Transactions
- II The Need for Predictable Rules
- III The Objective: Establishing Specific Standards and 'Case Groups' for the Different Elements of the Exemptions under Review
- §2 General Principles of Commercial Contracts: Methodological Approach
- I The Traditional Lex Mercatoria Doctrine, Its Deficiencies and the Distinct Concept of General Contract Principles
- A The Deficiencies of the Traditional lex mercatoria Doctrine
- B The Emergence of the New, New lex mercatoria
- C The Concept of General Contract Principles
- II General Principles of Law Method
- A Introduction
- B Prima Facie Evidence of General Contract Principles
- 1 The CISG
- 2 Soft Law Codifications, Particularly the UPICC
- Chapter 2 Scope of Application of General Contract Principles
- §3 General Remarks on the Governing Law and the Application of General Contract Principles
- I Introduction
- II The Parties' Authority to Provide for the Application of General Principles of Law
- III The Appropriateness for the Parties to Select General Principles of Law beyond Their Use As a Means of Interpreting and Supplementing a National Law or the Terms of the Contract
- §4 Choice of Law Agreement Providing for the Application of a National Law
- I Interpreting and Supplementing the Applicable National Law and the Terms of the Contract by General Contract Principles
- A Introduction
- B Comparative Method of Construction under the Applicable Domestic Law
- C Autonomous Basis: Specificity of International Transactions and International Arbitration in Particular - Application of the Domestic Law with a 'Broader Brush'
- D Distinguishing between the Concept of International Trade Usages and General Principles of Law
- E Limits of the Use of General Contract Principles As a Means of Interpreting Domestic Law or the Terms of the Contract
- F The Practical Significance of Interpretation and Gap-Filling of Domestic Law in the Light of the 'Force Majeure' and 'Hardship' Exemptions
- II Interpreting and Supplementing International Uniform Law Instruments with General Contract Principles, in Particular the CISG
- §5 No Choice of Law Made by the Parties
- I Authority to Apply General Contract Principles in the Absence of a Choice of Law: 'Rules of Law'
- 'Voie Directe'
- Review of Awards by State Courts
- A 'Rules of Law' versus a National System of Law
- B 'Voie directe': Direct Choice Method
- C Awards Made in Application of General Principles of Law in the Absence of a Choice of Law by the Parties Have Survived Judicial Challenge
- II Different Options as to How General Contract Principles May Be Applied or Taken Into Account in the Absence of a Choice of Law by the Parties
- A General Contract Principles as a Means of Interpreting and Supplementing the Applicable National Law
- B Concurrent Application of General Contract Principles in Conjunction with a National Law
- C Application of General Contract Principles Supplemented with the Law of a Particular State: Comparison with the tronc commun Doctrine
- D Selection of General Contract Principles As the Governing Law: 'Centre of Gravity Test' and Negative Choice of Law
- Chapter 3 The Concept of Non-performance
- §6 The Concept of Non-performance Under General Contract Principles
- I Main Features of the Concept of Non-performance
- A Overview
- B Definition of Non-performance: Breach of Contract
- II The Concept of Strict Contractual Liability: No Fault Requirement
- A The Concept of Strict Liability under General Contract Principles
- B The Concept of Strict Liability in Common Law and the Relevance of Fault for Contract Excuses
- C The Concept of Liability Based on Fault in Civil Law and Its Restrictions
- D Conclusion
- III The Requirement of Non-performance in Particular: Distinction between Obligations of Best Efforts and Obligations to Achieve a Specific Result
- Chapter 4 Force Majeure Excuse
- §7 The Force Majeure Excuse as a General Principle of Law
- I Salient Features of the Force Majeure Excuse Under General Contract Principles
- II Recognition of the Force Majeure Excuse as a General Principle of Law
- A Overview of Standards in Domestic Laws
- 1 Impossibility of Performance
- a In Civil Law Systems
- b The Concept of the Revised German BGB in Particular
- c Evaluation: The Decline of the Concept of Impossibility in Connection with Damages Claims
- 2 Frustration of Contract (English Law)
- a Introduction
- b Legal Basis of Doctrine
- c Legal Effects of Frustration
- d Basic Features of the Doctrine of Frustration and Different Groups of Cases
- e Impracticability Not Covered by the Doctrine of Frustration
- f Evaluation
- 3 Standards Adopted in the United States
- a Impracticability
- b Frustration of Purpose
- c Evaluation
- B Article 79 CISG and Its Reception by Domestic Laws, the UPICC, the PECL and Contract Practices
- 1 Article 79 CISG and Article 74 ULIS as Its Predecessor
- 2 Reception of the Standard of Article 79 CISG by Domestic Laws: The Example of China
- 3 Reception of the Standard of Article 79 CISG by the UPICC/PECL
- 4 Compatibility of the Standard of Article 79 CISG with Contract Practices (Force Majeure Clauses)
- C Conclusion
- §8 Individual Requirements of the Force Majeure Excuse Under General Contract Principles
- I Introduction
- A Scope of Application of the Force Majeure Excuse: Non-performance of a Contractual Obligation
- B The Requirements and Legal Effects of the Force Majeure Excuse in a Nutshell
- C Exemption Due to Interference by the Other Party and Force Majeure
- II Contractual Assumption or Limitation of the Risk of the Occurrence of Certain Impediments
- A Prevalence of a Contractual Risk Allocation: Typical Sphere of Control of the Obligor, Contractual Amendments and Risk Allocation
- B Typical Situations of Explicit or Implicit Contractual Risk Assumption or Exclusion or Limitation of a Particular Risk
- 1 Explicit or Implicit Risk Assumption
- a Express Undertakings, Guarantees, Adaptation Clauses
- b Narrow or Broad Interpretation of a Clause Allocating the Risk of the Occurrence of a Specified Event
- c Typical Situations of Implicit Risk Assumption: Foreseeable Contingencies
- Speculative Nature of the Transaction
- the Supplier's Performance Obligation Includes an Inherent Risk (Technological Breakthrough Cases)
- the Buyer's Risk to Use the Purchased Goods As Intended
- Risk Assumption by the Buyer Furnishing the Seller with Specifications
- CIF-Contracts and Fluctuations in Freight Rates
- 2 Assumption of the Risk to Obtain an Import or Export Licence or Other Authorization by
- a State Authority a Introduction
- b Identification of the Party Responsible for Obtaining a Required Authorization
- c Standard of Duty/Assumption of Risk and Consequences
- 3 Implicit Assumption of a Risk on the Basis of the Economic Principle of the Superior Risk Bearer?
- 4 Explicit or Implicit Exclusion or Limitation of
- a Particular Risk a Overview
- b Clauses Limiting the Seller's Procurement Risk, Especially Delivery-against-Supply Clauses
- c Requirements and Output Contracts
- d Clauses Excluding or Limiting the Liability in General and Their Validity (Exemption and Exculpatory Clauses)
- C Unforeseeability of the Impediment (Could Not Reasonably Be Taken into Account)
- 1 Foreseeability and Risk Allocation
- 2 Three-Step Approach
- Examples
- 3 Changes of Law in Particular
- III Impediments Beyond the Typical Sphere of Risk and Control of the Obligor
- A Typical Sphere of Control of the Obligor: Responsibility for Its Own Organization, for the Measures to Be Taken to Perform the Contract, Responsibility for Its Own Personnel
- Strikes
- Financial Ability
- B Typical Risk of the Seller: Procurement Risk in Case of Generic Goods
- 1 The Notion of Procurement Risk, Limitation and Legal Effects
- 2 Contractual Limitation of the Procurement Risk
- Delivery-against-Supply Clauses
- 3 Contract Interpretation with Regard to the Contractually Agreed Source(s) of Performance
- C Responsibility for 'Independent' Third Parties (Subcontractors, Suppliers)
- D Typical Risk Allocation in Case of Non-conformity of Goods Sold
- E Typical Risk Allocation in Case of Building Contracts
- 1 Destruction of a Building or Work in Course of Construction
- Impossibility of Completion
- 2 Lump Sum Prices (Fixed Prices): Allocation of the Risk of Price Increases or Decreases
- IV Impediments
- A Typical Impediments beyond the Obligor's Control: Acts of Public Authority, Armed Conflicts, Acts of God, Fire, Explosion, General Labour Disturbances and the Like
- B Economic 'Unaffordability' or 'Unreasonableness' of Performance
- 1 Practical Considerations
- 2 Legislative History of the CISG
- 3 Conclusions Regarding the Treatment of Hardship Situations under the CISG
- 4 Relationship with the Hardship Defence
- a Decrease in the Value of the Performance Received by the Other Party Falls Exclusively under the Hardship Exemption
- b Increases in Cost of Performance Also Fall, in Principle, under the Hardship Exemption
- c Exception: The Obligor Is Excused from Rendering Specific Performance Where the Events Leading to an Excessive Increase in the Cost of Performance Do Not Affect the Obligee's Performance Interest
- d Conclusion: Legal Consequences of the Hardship Exemption Should Generally Prevail
- e Illustration
- C Impediments Existing at the Time of the Conclusion of the Contract (Initial or Antecedent Impediments)
- 1 The Treatment of Initial Impediments in Domestic Laws
- a Traditional Approach in Civil Law Systems Based on the Roman Law Rule 'impossibilium nulla obligatio'
- b Modern Trend in Civil Law, Particularly the Concept of the New German Law
- c Common Law Approach
- d Approach under General Contract Principles
- 2 Initial Impediments and the Rules on Mistake Distinguished
- a General Considerations
- b Hardship and the Rules on Mistake
- c Mistakes about the Future
- 3 Invalidity of Contracts Due to Illegality and Force Majeure/Hardship Events Distinguished
- D Temporary and Partial Impediments
- 1 Temporary Impediments
- a Equation of Temporary Impediments with Permanent Impediments in Comparative Law
- b Equation of Temporary Impediments with Permanent Impediments under General Contract Principles
- (1) Probable duration of the impediment
- (2) Interests of the obligor
- (3) Interests of the obligee
- (4) Relevant point in time for the assessment
- c Legal Consequences of a Temporary Impediment Which Is to Be Equated with a Permanent Impediment
- 2 Partial Impediments
- V Legal Impediments (Acts of Public Authority) in Particular
- A Overview
- B Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration
- 1 Competence of Arbitral Tribunals to Apply Mandatory Rules (Arbitrability)
- Enforceability of Awards in Disregard of Mandatory Rules
- 2 Consideration of Mandatory Rules by Arbitral Tribunals As to the Substance of a Case: Two Categories of Cases
- C Application and Impact of Transnational Public Policy Rules
- 1 Direct Application of Transnational Public Policy Rules, Especially in Connection with the Issue of Contract Validity
- a Mandatory Rule Causes the Invalidity of the Contract in Whole or in Part
- b Mandatory Rule May Justify the Termination of the Contract
- c Impact of Mandatory Rules on the Extent of Damages, the Status of a State-Owned Company, or the Prohibition by Certain Islamic Countries to Pay Interest on Outstanding Debts (Examples)
- 2 Validity and Interpretation of Agreements to Disregard Mandatory Rules
- D Force Majeure Excuse and Mandatory Rules: Relevant Criteria and Examples
- 1 General Rule: Consideration of Mandatory Rules as a Factual Element
- 2 Unilateral Prohibitions of Trading and Conflicting Mandatory Rules
- Preference to the Rule Permitting Performance at the Place Where Specific Performance Can Be Rendered
- 3 Criteria for the Consideration of an Act of Public Authority under the Force Majeure Excuse
- a Overview
- b Examples Regarding the Requirement of a Close Connection
- c Example Regarding a Work Subcontract (Allocation of Risk between Main Contractor and Subcontractor)
- (1) Application of the embargo legislation ratione materiae to the subcontract
- (2) Permanent impediment
- (3) Obligation of the main contractor to compensate the subcontractor for the work already performed
- E Involvement of States or State Enterprises (State Arbitrations)
- 1 Guidelines According to Which an Act of Public Authority Is Attributable to a State Enterprise
- 2 Examples
- a Czarnikow Ltd v. Rolimpex (State Enterprise Excused)
- b Krupp-Koppers GmbH v. Kopex (State Enterprise Not Excused)
- c Jordan Investment Ltd. v. Sojuznefteksport (State Enterprise Excused)
- 3 Expropriation As a Distinct Concept
- 4 Force Majeure and State of Necessity under the ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
- VI Unforeseeable, Unavoidable and Unsurmountable Impediments
- A Unforeseeable Impediments
- B Unavoidable and Insurmountable Impediments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Commercially Reasonable Substitute Performance
- 3 The Risk Allocation under CIF-Contracts
- a Extra Costs of Shipping
- b CIF-Contracts and Export Prohibition
- Duty to Overcome the Impediment and to Buy Afloat
- 4 Groups of Cases Where the Typical Risk Structure of the Contract Limits the Duty to Overcome an Impediment (Sales Contracts of Specified Goods
- Lease Contracts
- Storage Contracts)
- a Sales Contracts for Specific Goods: Limitation of the Obligation to Overcome an Impediment As a Result of the Typical Contractual Risk Allocation
- b Lease Contracts
- c Storage Contracts
- VII Requirement of a Causal Link between the Impediment and the Non-performance
- VIII Notice Requirement
- §9 Legal Effects of the Force Majeure Excuse
- I Overview
- II Exclusion of the Right to Claim Damages
- Penalties, Liquidated Damages
- 'Surrogate Benefits'
- A Exclusion of the Right to Claim Damages and Application to Penalties or Liquidated Damages
- B Doctrine of 'Surrogate Benefit'
- C Excursus: Note on Other Defences to a Claim for Damages
- III Exclusion of the Right to Claim Specific Performance
- A Introduction
- B Approach under General Contract Principles
- C Article 79(5) CISG and the (Non-)exclusion of the Right to Performance
- D Termination upon Allowance for Extra Time for Performance
- Request for Repair or Delivery of Substitute Goods
- IV Unaffected Remedies
- A The Right to Terminate and the Legal Consequences
- 1 In General
- 2 Notice Requirement: No ipso facto Termination and Exception in case of Excused Permanent and Total Impediments
- 3 Effects of Termination
- B Withholding Performance
- C Price Reduction
- D Interest on Money Due
- V Burden of Proof
- §10 Interpretation and Effects of Force Majeure Clauses
- Chapter 5 Hardship (Change of Circumstances): Fundamental Change of the Equilibrium of the Contract
- §11 Hardship as a General Principle of Law
- I Salient Features of the 'Hardship' Defence under General Contract Principles
- A Introduction
- B Salient Features of the Hardship (Change of Circumstances) Defence under General Contract Principles
- II Recognition of the Hardship Defence as a General Principle of Law
- A General Approach in Civil Law
- B Common Law
- C 'Frustration of Purpose' As a Sub-category of a Fundamental Alteration of the Equilibrium of the Contract
- D International Law
- E Arbitration Practice
- F Conclusion
- §12 Individual Requirements of the Hardship Defence
- I Introduction
- A General Relevance of the Force Majeure Requirements
- B Distinguishing between the Concept of Implied Terms and Hardship
- II Circumstances Beyond the Control and Sphere of Risk of the Obligor Bringing about a Fundamental Alteration of the Equilibrium of the Contract
- A Contractual Assumption or Limitation of the Risk of the Occurrence of a Change of Circumstances
- B Percentage of the Cost or the Value of the Performance Likely to Amount to a 'Fundamental' Alteration of Equilibrium of the Contract (Threshold Test of the Hardship Exemption)
- 1 The Usefulness of a Threshold Test As a Basic Yardstick
- 2 Overview of Percentages Referred to in Domestic Legal Systems
- a English Law and the Doctrine of Frustration of Purpose
- b American Law
- c German Law and Other Civil Law Jurisdictions
- 3 Relevant Percentages As a Reference Point under General Contract Principles
- a General Rule: 100% Alteration Required
- Calculation
- b Impending Financial Ruin of the Obligor
- C Long-Term Contracts in Particular
- 1 Risk Allocation
- 2 Examples of Risk Assumption in International Investment Contracts: The CMS Gas Award and the Himpurna Award
- a CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic
- b Himpurna California Energy Ltd. (Bermuda) v. PT. (Persero) Perusahaan Listruik Negara (Indonesia)
- 3 Inflation in Particular
- a Introduction
- b Creeping Inflation
- Escalator and Index Clauses
- c Relationship between Escalator Clauses and the Hardship Exemption
- d Cases Involving Extreme Inflation
- D Point of Reference in Case of Complex, Long-term or Instalment Contracts
- 1 Relevancy of the Entire Undertaking
- 2 Application to Long-Term or Instalment Contracts
- III Frustration of Purpose as a Particular Group of Cases of Hardship
- A Introduction
- B Distinguishing between Different Groups of Cases
- 1 Cases Where the Purpose of the Contract Is Achieved or Frustrated before Performance Can Be Effected ('Zweckerreichung'
- 'Zweckfortfall')
- 2 Non-conformity of Goods Sold
- C The Requirement of a 'Joint Purpose'
- D Requirement That the Frustration of Purpose Be Nearly Total and That It Cannot Be Reasonably Overcome
- E Provisional or Temporary Character of Frustrations of the Purpose, in Particular in Case of Changes of the Law
- §13 Legal Effects of Hardship
- I Overview
- II Duty to Renegotiate
- A Legal Nature and Consequences in Case of Infringement
- B Contents of the Duty to Renegotiate
- C Exercise of the Right to Request Renegotiations
- D No Withholding of Performance by the Aggrieved Party as a Consequence of a Request for Renegotiation
- E A Party's Right to Resort to the Court upon Failure to Reach Agreement
- Determination of Time When Renegotiation Failed
- Suspension of Court Proceedings
- III Courts' and Arbitrators' Power to Adapt the Contract
- A The Court's or Arbitral Tribunal's Power to Adapt the Contract as a Matter of Substantive Law: Recognition as a General Principle
- 1 Civil Law
- 2 Common Law
- 3 Conclusion
- B The Arbitrators' Power to Adapt the Contract under the lex arbitri
- C The Mechanism of Contract Adaptation
- D Procedural Aspects
- in Particular Significance of the Relief Sought
- E Comparison of the Procedural Aspects under the General Approach with the Approach Taken by Italian Law and the ICC Hardship Clause 2003
- IV The Right to Request Termination of the Contract
- A General Remarks
- B Relationship with the Right to Request Adaptation of the Contract
- C Termination of the Contract at a Date and on Terms to Be Determined by the Court
- §14 Interpretation and Legal Effects of Hardship Clauses
- §15 Hardship Distinguished from Other Remedies
- I Avoidance of Contract for Relevant Mistake
- II Termination of Relational Long-term Contracts for 'Irreconcilable Differences' ('Good Cause'
- 'Valid Reasons')
- A Introduction
- B Relationship with the Hardship Concept/Doctrine of Change of Circumstances
- C Basic Features of the Right to Terminate for Irreconcilable Differences
- 1 Scope of Application
- a Long-Term or Relational Contracts
- b Termination for Fundamental Non-performance As a Distinct Remedy
- 2 Irreconcilable Differences ('Good Cause') in Case of Partnership Agreements
- a Swiss Law
- b American Case Law
- c The Case of Arthur Andersen v. Andersen Consulting
- Chapter 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Principles on Force Majeure in the CISG, UPICC, PECL, the TLDB-Principles and ICC Force Majeure Clause 2003
- Principles on Hardship in the UPICC, PECL, the TLDB-Principles and ICC Hardship Clause 2003
- Index
System requirements
File format: ePUB
Copy protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (not Kindle).
The file format ePub works well for novels and non-fiction books – i.e., „flowing” text without complex layout. On an e-reader or smartphone, line and page breaks automatically adjust to fit the small displays.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our ebook Help page.