
The Priority of Justice
Elements for a Sociology of Moral Choices
Peter Lang Verlag
Published on 20. June 2005
Book
Paperback/Softback
258 pages
978-3-03910-658-5 (ISBN)
Description
One characteristic of modern society is that individuals no longer share a common or unique conception of good and evil. Social cohesion is maintained by a general agreement to live together which requires impartiality towards everyone and which takes precedence over the different conceptions of the good. This is what the authors call the priority of justice. This book highlights this priority and provides a new approach to moral choices in modern societies.
The book focuses on two objectives. Firstly, it examines how and why modern individuals give priority to the right over the good. Opinion polls are the basis of this examination, through the model of a 'fair spectator' giving priority to the reasonable over the rational. Secondly, it analyses what constitutes the principle of justice an individual applies. This book is about resolving conflicts and social justice. It takes account of the plurality of moral values and looks at norms from a fair standpoint, avoiding the famous 'anything goes' and paying attention to what people think.
More details
Edition
New edition
Language
English
Place of publication
Lausanne
Switzerland
Target group
Professional and scholarly
Edition type
New edition
Illustrations
1 fig., 17 tables
Dimensions
Height: 220 mm
Width: 150 mm
Thickness: 15 mm
Weight
370 gr
ISBN-13
978-3-03910-658-5 (9783039106585)
Schweitzer Classification
Persons
The Authors: Michel Forsé is a Senior Research Fellow at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS). He has published several books on sociology.
Maxime Parodi is a sociologist and an Associate Research Fellow at the French National Foundation for Political Sciences (OFCE).
Content
Contents: The Fair Spectator Model ¿ An Application to the Analysis of a Poll on Economic Opinions ¿ The Logic of Justice as Unanimous Agreement ¿ Three Examples of Unsatisfactory Procedures ¿ The Objectivity of Reasonable Choice.