Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science
1st Edition
Published on 1. September 2020
Book
Paperback/Softback
250 pages
978-1-138-82578-9 (ISBN)
Description
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science asks twelve philosophers to debate six questions that are driving contemporary work in this area of philosophy. The questions are:
I. Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?
II. Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?
III. Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-Fundamental?
IV. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?
V. Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?
VI. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?
These debates explore the philosophical foundations of particular scientific disciplines, while also examining more general issues in the philosophy of science. The result is a book that's perfect for the advanced philosophy student, building up her knowledge of the foundations of the field and engaging with its cutting-edge questions. Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated lists of further readings for each controversy, and study questions for each chapter help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers.
I. Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?
II. Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?
III. Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-Fundamental?
IV. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?
V. Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?
VI. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?
These debates explore the philosophical foundations of particular scientific disciplines, while also examining more general issues in the philosophy of science. The result is a book that's perfect for the advanced philosophy student, building up her knowledge of the foundations of the field and engaging with its cutting-edge questions. Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated lists of further readings for each controversy, and study questions for each chapter help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers.
More details
Language
English
Place of publication
London
United Kingdom
Publishing group
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Target group
College/higher education
Dimensions
Height: 229 mm
Width: 152 mm
ISBN-13
978-1-138-82578-9 (9781138825789)
Copyright in bibliographic data is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or its licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions
Shamik Dasgupta | Ravit Dotan | Brad Weslake
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science
E-Book
10/2020
1st Edition
Routledge
€59.49
Available for download
Shamik Dasgupta | Ravit Dotan | Brad Weslake
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science
E-Book
10/2020
1st Edition
Routledge
€59.49
Available for download
Persons
Shamik Dasgupta is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has taught since 2016. He works in metaphysics, philosophy of science, and value theory.
Ravit Dotan is a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of machine learning.
Brad Weslake is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NYU Shanghai. His central research interest is philosophy of science, especially causation and explanation.
Ravit Dotan is a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of machine learning.
Brad Weslake is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NYU Shanghai. His central research interest is philosophy of science, especially causation and explanation.
Content
Introduction Part I: Are Boltzmann Brains Bad? 1. Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad 2. What Follows from the Possibility of Boltzmann Brains? Part II: Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth? 3. Mathematical Explanation Requires Mathematical Truth 4. Mathematical Explanation Doesn't Require Mathematical Truth Part III: Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-fundamental? 5. Against Wavefunction Realism 6. Separability, Locality, and Higher Dimensions in Quantum Mechanics Part IV: Is Evolution Fundamental When it Comes to Defining Biological Ontology? 7. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Biological Ontology? 8. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology? Yes Part V: Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental? 9. Chance and the Great Divide 10. On Chance (or, Why I am Only a Half-Humean) Part VI: Are Sexes Natural Kinds? 11. Are Sexes Natural Kinds? 12 The Animal Sexes as Historical Explanatory Kinds