
Essential Cases on Damage
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
The increasing Europeanisation of the law of delict/torts has produced textbooks, casebooks, monographs, and also sets of model rules of a genuinely European character. A major gap still existing today relates to the experiences gathered in the national legal systems over the past decades. The present work attempts to fill this gap for one key element of tort law: the notion of damage. It thus does what the previous volume in the 'Digest of European Tort Law' series did for another key element, ie natural causation. Once again, the publication contains a selection of the most important cases decided in
26 states across Europe as well as by the European Court of Justice. For each case the facts and the relevant court decision are presented, and the decision is analysed within the wider context of the development of the respective legal system. In addition, the editors provide comparative analyses of the case law reported in this volume concerning all the specific problems raised under the heading of damage. The publication also looks into how key cases would be resolved under the European model rules drafted in the field of tort law; and it also highlights cases from earlier periods of legal history.
The editors believe that the material gathered here may provide guidance for an organic convergence of the national legal systems in Europe. It constitutes the basis of an acquis commun that is infinitely richer (though also much more complex) than the rather bland and abstract concepts contained in national codifications, European legislation, and the modern model rules.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions


Persons
Content
- Intro
- Preface
- Overview
- Abbreviations
- Questionnaire Structure
- Questionnaire
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. PECUNIARY DAMAGE
- III. NON-PECUNIARY DAMAGE
- IV. BORDERLINE CASES
- V. SPECIFIC SITUATIONS
- VI. OTHERS
- 1. General Overview
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 2. Objective Value
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 3. Subjective Value
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 20. Latvia
- 22. Poland
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 4. Loss of Working Capacity
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 5. Primary and Consequential Damage
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 6. Positive Damage and Loss of Profit
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 7. Loss of Illicit Profits
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 8. Damage without any Material Alteration
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 9. Reliance and Expectation Loss
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 10. Alteration of a Good or Diminution of its Value
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 11. Non-Pecuniary Damage in General
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 12. Non-Pecuniary Consequential Damage
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 27. Bulgaria
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 13. Non-Pecuniary Damage without Harm
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report (Categories 11-13)
- 14. Value of Affection
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 24. Slovakia
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 15. Loss of Enjoyment
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 16. Frustration
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 17. Loss of Use
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 18. 'Grey Area' between Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Damage
- 3. Austria
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 10. Spain
- 13. Scotland
- 15. Denmark
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 19. Additional Categories Apart from Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Loss
- 5. Greece
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 20. Wrongful Conception
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 19. Estonia
- 23. Czech Republic
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 21. Wrongful Birth
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 22. Wrongful Life
- 2. Germany
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 23. Environmental Damage
- 2. Germany
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 19. Estonia
- 20. Latvia
- 21. Lithuania
- 23. Czech Republic
- 24. Slovakia
- 25. Hungary
- 26. Romania
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 24. Collective Damage
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 22. Poland
- 23. Czech Republic
- 26. Romania
- 28. European Union
- 30. Comparative Report
- 25. Mere Exposure to a Danger
- 1. Historical Report
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 16. Norway
- 17. Sweden
- 18. Finland
- 21. Lithuania
- 22. Poland
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 26. Loss of a Chance as Damage
- 2. Germany
- 3. Austria
- 4. Switzerland
- 5. Greece
- 6. France
- 7. Belgium
- 8. The Netherlands
- 9. Italy
- 10. Spain
- 11. Portugal
- 12. England and Wales
- 13. Scotland
- 14. Ireland
- 15. Denmark
- 19. Estonia
- 22. Poland
- 25. Hungary
- 28. European Union
- 29. The Principles of European Tort Law and the Draft Common Frame of Reference
- 30. Comparative Report
- 27. Further Categories
- 16. Norway
- 23. Czech Republic
- 28. Others
- 4. Switzerland
- Contributors
- Index
- Publications
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy protection: Watermark-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Use the free software Adobe Reader, Adobe Digital Editions, or any other PDF viewer of your choice (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/Smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or another reading app for eBooks, e.g., PocketBook (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Watermark-DRM, a „soft” copy protection. This means that there are no technical restrictions to prevent illegal distribution. However, there is a personalised watermark embedded in the eBook that can be used to identify the purchaser of the eBook in the event of misuse and to provide evidence for legal purposes.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.