
Think Tank Research Quality
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
All prices
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Intro
- Think Tank Research Quality
- Lessons for Policymakers, the Media, and the Public
- CONTENTS
- 1. A Win-Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on How Vouchers Affect Public Schools
- 2. The Effect of Special Education Vouchers on Public School Achievement
- 3. Are Private High Schools Better Academically Than Public High Schools?
- 4. Markets Versus Monopolies in Education
- 5. A School Privatization Primer for Michigan School Officials, Media and Residents
- 6. Two Philadelphia Reports
- 7. Freedom and Saving Money: The Fiscal Impact of the DC Voucher Program
- 8. School Choice by the Numbers
- 9. Series of Reports on The Fiscal Impact of Tax-Credit Scholarships
- 10. Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition
- 11. Trends in Charter School Authorizing
- 12. Public Charter Schools: A Great Value for Ohio's Public Education System
- 13. Weighted Student Formula Yearbook 2009
- 14. How Much Are Public School Teachers Paid?
- 15. End It, Don't Mend It: What to Do With No Child Left Behind
- 16. Answering the Question That Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind?
- 17. The State of State Standards 2006
- 18. Report Card on American Education
- 19. Sound an Investment: An Analysis of Federal Prekindergarten Proposals
- 20. Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification
- 21. Giving Students the Chaff: How to Find and Keep the Teachers We Need
- Think Tank Research Quality
- Lessons for Policymakers, the Media, and the Public
- edited by
- Kevin G. Welner
- University of Colorado at Boulder
- Patricia H. Hinchey
- Penn State
- Alex Molnar
- Arizona State University
- and
- Don Weitzman
- Independent Researcher
- Information Age Publishing, Inc.
- Charlotte, North Carolina www.infoagepub.com
- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
- Introduction
- Bringing Think Tank Research Into the Scholarly Debate
- Alex Molnar and Kevin G. Welner
- Why the Think Tank Review Project Was Launched
- Selecting Publications to Review
- The Review Process
- The Ascendance of Market-Oriented Think Tanks
- The Strategic Value of Ideas
- A Book Overview
- Notes and References
- Part 1
- School Choice and the Benefits of Competition
- A Win-Win Solution
- The Empirical Evidence on How Vouchers Affect Public Schools
- Christopher Lubienski
- Review of Greg Forster's "A Win-Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on How Vouchers Affect Public Schools," published by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. This is a modified version of a review originally published on April 27, 2009
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 1
- The Effect of Special Education Vouchers on Public School Achievement
- John T. Yun
- Review of Jay P. Greene & Marcus Winters's "The Effect of Special Education Vouchers on Public School Achievement: Evidence from Florida's McKay Scholarship Program," published by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. This is a modifie...
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Achievement Analysis
- Selection Bias
- Attrition/Choice Bias
- Assignment Bias
- Supply Bias
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 2
- Part 2
- Private School Supremacy and Voucher Achievement Gains
- Table 3.1. National Average Public and Private High School 10th to 12th Grade Math Achievement Gain Scores and the Private-Public School Gaps in NELS and ELS
- Are Private High Schools Better Academically Than Public High Schools?
- Jaekyung Lee
- Review of "Are Private High Schools Better Academically Than Public High Schools?" by Harold Wenglinsky, published by the Center on Education Policy, and of "Monopoly Versus Markets: The Empirical Evidence on Private Schools and School Choice,...
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Reports
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions of the Reports
- The Reports' Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Reports' Methodologies
- Review of the Validity of the Findings And Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Reports for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 3
- Markets Versus Monopolies in Education
- Clive Belfield
- Review of Andrew Coulson's "Markets vs. Monopolies in Education: A Global Review of the Evidence," published by the Cato Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published September 30, 2008.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Rationale for its Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 4
- Part 3
- Contracting Out and Private Management
- A School Privatization Primer for Michigan School Officials, Media and Residents
- Clive Belfield
- Review of Michael D. LaFaive's "A School Privatization Primer for Michigan School Officials, Media and Residents," published by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. This is a modified version of a review originally published on February 19, 2008
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 5
- Table 6.1. Illustration of Peterson's Critique of RAND-RFA Diverse Provider Analyses
- Two Philadelphia Reports
- Derek C. Briggs
- Review of "State Takeover, School Restructuring, Private Management, and Student Achievement in Philadelphia" by Brian Gill, Ron Zimmer, Jolley Christman and Suzanne Blanc, and published by RAND Corporation and Research For Action, and review of...
- Introduction
- 1. Forty-five schools were to receive private management from one of seven for-profit, nonprofit, and university providers ("private management")
- 2. Twenty-one schools were to be managed by the SDP ("district management")
- 3. Sixteen schools were to continue to manage themselves (known as the "sweet-sixteen" schools)
- and
- 4. Four schools were to be transformed into charter schools.
- Findings and Conclusions of the Two Reports
- The RAND-RFA Report
- The PEPG Report
- The Reports' Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Reports' Methods
- 1. Insufficient context is provided to help the reader evaluate the use of their fixed effects model.
- 2. Combining the results from different tests, some of which are high- stakes (PSSA) and some of which as low-stakes (Terra-Nova and Stanford 9), may lead to underestimating the effects of privately managed schools because students at these schools m...
- 3. The RAND-RFA analysis does not constitute a quasi-experimental analysis because "Instead of comparing gains during the pre-treatment with gains post-treatment, the researchers simply compared levels of achievement.. As a result, their study is...
- 1. The baseline year for PEPG's comparisons of Grade 5 to Grade 8 growth in each of the two cohorts (2002, 2003) does not precede the restructuring interventions. This means that any initial effects of the reform are not captured by the PEPG analys...
- 2. The PEPG report only includes the privately managed and district- managed categories schools that include both Grade 5 and Grade 8. This is illustrated in Table 6.2. The two shaded (K-8 and 5-8) columns indicate the subset of schools that would be...
- 3. Based only on the school-level summaries of student achievement data available to Peterson, we have no way of knowing how many of the students represented in a given school's Grade 5 test scores are subsequently represented in the Grade 8 test s...
- 4. As noted above, Peterson's sample of schools is restricted because SDP schools vary in terms of the grade span they include. His approach for comparing test-score change over time only works for schools that have students in both Grade 5 and Gra...
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Reports for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 6
- Figure 6.1. P = PSSA Tests, S = Stanford 9 Tests, T = Terra Nova Tests.
- Table 6.2. Illustration of Subset of Private and District Providers Included in the PEPG Analysis Using 2006-07 Data
- Part 4
- Vouchers Save Money
- Freedom and Saving Money
- The Fiscal Impact of the DC Voucher Program
- Christopher Lubienski
- Review of "Spreading Freedom and Saving Money: The Fiscal Impact of the D.C. Voucher Program," by Leon Michos and Susan Aud and published by the Cato Institute and the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. This is a modified version of a re...
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- 1. The DC voucher program successfully responds to substantial demand on the part of parents to choose private schools for their children.
- 2. Principals do, in fact, exercise substantial control over variable costs, so that they may adjust school-level budgets to respond to the gain or loss of students.
- 3. The program currently saves the District money on education, with most of those savings coming from the additional grant from Congress.
- 4. Additional savings would accrue even if the program were fully funded through local sources, due to competitive incentives and efficiencies.
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Methods and Use of Research Literature
- Missing Efficiency
- Missing Costs
- Missing Research
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 7
- Table 8.1. Voucher and Tax Credit Programs Summarized by Aud (2007)
- Table 8.3. Announced Tuition at Private Providers of Secondary Education in Vermont 2007-08
- Table 8.2. Changes in Total Budgets and Per Pupil Budgets in Cleveland and Milwaukee
- School Choice by the Numbers
- Bruce Baker
- Review of Susan Aud's "School Choice by the Numbers: The Fiscal Effect of School Choice Programs 1990 - 2006," published by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. This is a modified version of a review originally published on May 24,...
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Rationale for its Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- 1. Cost Savings Versus Government Expenditure Reduction
- 2. Is There a Net Change in Aggregate Public Expenditures on Elementary and Secondary Schooling?
- 3. In Context, How Much Money Are We Really Talking About?
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 8
- Table 8.4. Current (2005) Private School Enrollments by Poverty Group in Voucher Contexts
- Table 8.5. Voucher Savings Relative to Direct Current Expenditures on K-12 Schools in 2004-05
- Series of Reports on The Fiscal Impact of Tax- Credit Scholarships
- Luis Huerta
- Review of the series of reports from the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, "The Fiscal Impact of Tax-Credit Scholarships." This is a modified version of a review originally published on June 22, 2009.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Reports
- The Reports' Rationale for Their Findings and Conclusions
- Enrollment, Revenues and Expenditures
- Private School Choice Demand
- Contributions, Voucher Supply and Voucher Demand
- The Reports' Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Reports' Methods and Validity of the Findings
- Measuring Equity of Resources and Calculating Expenditures
- Supply of Private School Seats and Demand for Private Schooling
- Estimating Fiscal Impact and Beneficiaries
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 9
- Part 5
- Charter Schools
- Notes and References
- Schools in Eight States
- Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration, and Competition
- Derek C. Briggs
- Review of "Charter Schools in Eight States: Effects on Achievement, Attainment, Integration and Competition," by Ron Zimmer, Brian Gill, Kevin Booker, Stephane Lavertu, Tim Sass and John Witte and published by the RAND Corporation. This is a modi...
- Introduction
- 1. What are the characteristics of students transferring to charter schools?
- 2. What effect do charter schools have on test-score gains for students who transfer between traditional public schools and charter schools?
- 3. What is the effect of attending a charter high school on the probability of graduating and of entering college?
- 4. What effect does the introduction of charter schools have on the test scores of students in nearby public schools?
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- 1. On average, students who transfer into charter schools have test scores similar to, or lower than, those of their peers in the public schools they previously attended. The authors conclude from this that charter schools are not "skimming" high...
- 2. In five jurisdictions, test score gains associated with charter schools in reading and math were about the same as those associated with traditional public schools. Only in Texas and Chicago were significant effects found for charter schools, and ...
- 3. Students who attend charter high schools in Florida and Chicago are significantly more likely to graduate and are more likely to attend a 2- or 4-year college than their peers in traditional public high schools. These results do not appear to be a...
- 4. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that the presence of charter schools affects the performance of nearby public schools, in either a positive direction (e.g., through competition) or a negative direction (e.g., by diverting financial ...
- The Report's Rationale for its Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of the Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- The Characteristics of Students Who Transfer to Charter Schools
- The Effects of Charter Schools on Academic Achievement and Educational Attainment
- The Effect of Charter Competition on Nearby Public Schools
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- The Characteristics of Students who Transfer to Charter Schools
- The Effect of Charter Schools on Academic Achievement
- The Effect of Charter Schools on Educational Attainment
- The Effect of Charter Competition on Nearby Public Schools
- Usefulness of the Report for Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 10
- Table 11.1. Authorizer's Use of Data Models
- Trends in Charter School Authorizing
- Ernest R. House
- Review of Rebecca Gau's "Trends in Charter School Authorizing," published by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on May 10, 2006.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions, and Usefulness of the Report for Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 11
- Public Charter Schools
- A Great Value for Ohio's Public Education System
- Gary Miron
- Review of "Public Charter Schools: A Great Value for Ohio's Public Education System," by Matthew Carr and Beth Lear and published by The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions. This is a modified version of a review originally published ...
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Rationale for its Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Charter School Finance in Ohio: A More Complete Description
- Cost Advantages and Disadvantages
- Serving Less-Costly-to-Educate Students and Providing Fewer Programs
- Considering All Sources of Revenue
- Increased Charter School Enrollment Benefits Districts Financially-Really?
- 1. The overall costs go down for school districts
- 2. The amount of locally raised taxes stays the same because it is based on a millage tax
- and
- 3. As a result of this, the district receives fewer state dollars since the locally raised dollars cover a higher proportion of district costs.
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 12
- Part 6
- School Funding
- Figure 13.1. Framework of the Weighted Student Formula Yearbook 2009.
- Table 13.1. Empowerment Benchmarks in Weighted Student Formula Yearbook 2009
- Weighted Student Formula Yearbook 2009
- Bruce Baker
- Review of Lisa Snell's "Weighted Student Formula Yearbook 2009," published by the Reason Foundation. This is a modified version of a review originally published on May 13, 2009.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Rationale for its Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- 1. The Report Neglects Large Bodies of Relevant Literature
- 2. The Report Neglects Disagreeable Findings in the Literature it Does Cite
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 13
- Appendix: Reforms Investigated and Evidence of Success
- 1. In other words, cases where the report credits WSF for successful outcomes that occurred before WSF was implemented.
- 2. Does the outcome evidence include claims of improved outcome that occurred concurrent with implementation-before implementation was completed and could have had any measurable effects (Instantaneous)? Maintenance effect refers to those cases whe...
- 3. Many cases address performance outcomes only with respect to the district's own past performance but do not explain, for example, whether the district's own performance gains are better or worse than those of other districts.
- 4. This column addresses whether any attempts were made to compare effects of the reforms on otherwise similar (randomly selected or with statistical controls) students, in any of the analyses, internal to the report or externally cited evidence.
- How Much Are Public School Teachers Paid?
- Sean P. Corcoran and Lawrence Mishel
- Review of "How Much Are Public School Teachers Paid?" by Jay P. Greene and Marcus A. Winters and published by the Manhattan Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on February 19, 2007.
- Introduction
- The Report's Findings and Conclusions
- Report's Rationales for its Findings and Conclusions
- Review of the Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 14
- Part 7
- No Child Left Behind and Standards-Based Accountability
- End It, Don't Mend It
- What to Do With No Child Left Behind
- Bruce Fuller
- Review of "End It, Don't Mend It: What to Do with No Child Left Behind," by Neal McCluskey and Andrew J. Coulson, published by the Cato Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on October 8, 2007.
- Introduction
- Findings, Conclusions, and Rationales of the Report
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods and of the Validity of its Findings and Conclusions
- Logical and Methodological Gaps
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 15
- Answering the Question That Matters Most
- Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind?
- John T. Yun
- Review of "Answering the Question That Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind?" published by the Center on Education Policy. This is a modified version of a review originally published on June 26, 2007.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- 1. In most states with three or more years of comparable test data, student achievement in reading and math has gone up since 2002, the year NCLB was enacted.
- 2. There is more evidence of the narrowing of achievement gaps between groups of students since 2002 than of gaps widening. Sill the magnitude of the gaps is often substantial.
- 3. In 9 of the 13 states with sufficient data to determine pre- and post-NCLB trends, average yearly gains in test scores were greater after NCLB took effect than before.
- 4. It is very difficult if not impossible, to determine the extent to which these trends and test results have occurred because of NCLB. Since 2002, states, school districts and schools have simultaneously implemented many different but interconnecte...
- 5. Although NCLB emphasizes public reporting of state test data, the data necessary to reach definitive conclusions about achievement were sometimes hard to find or unavailable, or had holes or discrepancies. More attention should be given to issues ...
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methodologies
- Trend Analysis
- Gap Analysis
- Pre- and Post-NCLB Analysis
- Robustness
- Review of the Validity of the Findings And Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 16
- Part 8
- Report Cards: Bad Grades Make Headlines
- The State of State Standards 2006
- Kenneth R. Howe
- Review of "The State of State Standards 2006," by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Liam Julian, and Michael J. Petrilli, and published by the Fordham Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on September 11, 2006.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- 1. Between 2000 (pre-NCLB) and 2006 there has been no overall progress in raising the quality of state content standards. While some have gotten better, this is offset by others getting worse. The average grade in 2000, C-, remained the average grade...
- 2. Students in states with better content standards do better on performance standards.
- 3. Effective leadership on the part of office holders, representatives of business, and academic experts, against often significant resistance, is required for states to develop good content standards.
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Analysis 1, English/language Arts
- Analysis 2, Science
- Analysis 3, Mathematics
- The Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 17
- Report Card on American Education
- Gene V Glass
- Review of Andrew T. LeFevre's "Report Card on American Education," published by the American Legislative Exchange Council. This is a modified version of a review originally published on January 8, 2007.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Relationship between Spending and Student Performance
- Class Size
- Teacher Quality and Salary
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Measurement Methods
- Analysis Methods
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Relationship Between Spending and Student Performance
- Teacher Quality and Salary
- State-Level NAEP Data
- Parental Choice
- The Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 18
- Part 9
- Preschool
- Notes and References
- Sound an Investment
- An Analysis of Federal Prekindergarten Proposals
- W. Steven Barnett
- Review of "How Sound an Investment? An Analysis of Federal Prekindergarten Proposals," by Robert Holland and Don Soifer, and published by the Lexington Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on March 24, 2008.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 19
- Part 10
- Teacher Quality
- Table 20.1. Distribution of Teachers by Grade
- Table 20.2. Average Teacher Experience
- Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification
- Sean P. Corcoran and Jennifer L. Jennings
- Review of "An Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification: Final Report," by Jill Constantine, Daniel Player, Tim Silva, Kristin Hallgren, Mary Grider, John Deke, and published by Mathematica Policy Research. This is ...
- Introduction
- 1. The study's design makes it difficult to discern what, exactly, constitutes the "treatment" in this experiment, thus limiting its internal validity.
- 2. The report's findings cannot be generalized beyond a highly specific population of high-needs, high-turnover classrooms of early grade students, thus limiting its capacity to address questions about the relative success of traditional and altern...
- 3. The limited attention to findings of negative outcomes associated with alternatively certified teachers distorts the study's policy implications.
- The Report's Findings and Conclusions
- Report's Rationales for its Findings and Conclusions
- Review of the Report's Use of the Research Literature
- Review of the Report's Methods
- Internal Validity: What Is the Nature of the Treatment?
- Internal Validity: Cooperation and Interference
- Internal Validity: The Effects of Teacher-Student Race Matching
- External Validity: To What Populations Do These Results Apply?
- Selection of Schools and Districts
- Selection of Grades
- Selection of Teachers
- Selective Emphasis of Results
- 1. The authors reported that there was no difference between the math performance of AC and TC teachers, and that there was no variation in the effects of AC versus TC teachers across grade levels. Yet the authors excluded scores from half of the mat...
- 2. A central concern with AC programs is how the timing of teacher- education coursework affects student outcomes. The Mathematica study found that the students of alternatively certified teachers currently taking coursework-43% of all alternativel...
- 3. The report's findings are also sensitive to the inclusion or exclusion of students and teachers who exited during the study. The authors find that after excluding students and teachers who left during the year from the analysis, the students of ...
- 4. There are potentially important geographic variations in the effects of alternative certification that were not attended to in the press release or executive summary. The authors found that overall the students of AC teachers in California perform...
- 5. The authors underplay the finding that on all instructional dimensions observed in the classroom, high-coursework AC teachers were rated substantially worse than high-coursework TC teachers. The reason they de-emphasize this is that many of these ...
- 6. Finally, the authors underplay that AC teachers received lower principal ratings-some of them a great deal lower-on every dimension. Again, because the sample size is small, even large differences-for example, the .42 standard deviation TC a...
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Report's Usefulness for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 20
- Giving Students the Chaff
- How to Find and Keep the Teachers We Need
- Raymond Pecheone and Ash Vasudeva
- Review of Marie Gryphon's "Giving Students the Chaff: How to Find and Keep the Teachers We Need," published by the Cato Institute. This is a modified version of a review originally published on October 25, 2006.
- Introduction
- Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- Rationales Supporting the Findings and Conclusions of the Report
- The Report's Use of Research Literature
- Review of the Validity of the Findings and Conclusions
- Hiring Policies and Working Conditions
- Compensation Policies and Private/Charter School Comparisons
- Usefulness of the Report for Guidance of Policy and Practice
- Notes and References
- chapter 21
- conclusion
- Junk Social Science: Its Patrons and Its Audience
- Kevin G. Welner and Alex Molnar
- Scientists and economists have been offered $10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of the world's largest oil companies to undermine a major climate change report due to be published today.
- Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an ExxonMobil-funded thinktank with close links to the Bush administration, offered the payments for articles that emphasise the shortcomings of a report from the UN's Intergovernmental Panel...
- Travel expenses and additional payments were also offered. * * *
- The AEI has received more than $1.6m from ExxonMobil and more than 20 of its staff have worked as consultants to the Bush administration. Lee Raymond, a former head of ExxonMobil, is the vice-chairman of AEI's board of trustees.1
- Notes and References
- About the Authors
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.
File format: ePUB
Copy protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (not Kindle).
The file format ePub works well for novels and non-fiction books – i.e., „flowing” text without complex layout. On an e-reader or smartphone, line and page breaks automatically adjust to fit the small displays.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our ebook Help page.