Fair Trials
The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights
1st Edition
Published on 10. August 2007
200 pages
978-1-84731-375-1 (ISBN)
Description
The right to a fair trial has become an issue of increasing public concern, following a series of high profile cases such as the Bulger case, Khan (Sultan) and R v DPP ex p Kebilene. In determining the scope of the right, we now increasingly look to the ECHR, but the court has given little guidance, focusing on reconciling procedural rules rather than addressing the broader issues. This book addresses the issue of the meaning of the right by examining the contemporary jurisprudence in the light of a body of historical literature which discusses criminal procedure in a European context. It argues that there is in fact a European criminal procedural tradition which has been neglected in contemporary discussions, and that an understanding of this tradition might illuminate the discussion of fair trial in the contemporary jurisprudence.
This challenging new work elucidates the meaning of the fair trial and in doing so challenges the conventional approach to the analysis of criminal procedure as based on the distinction between adversarial and inquisitorial procedural systems. The book is divided into two parts. The first part is dominated by an examination of the fair trial principles in the works of several notable European jurists of the nineteenth century, arguing that their writings were instrumental in the development of the principles underlying the modern conception of criminal proceedings. The second part looks at the fair trials jurisprudence of the ECHR and it is suggested that although the Court has neglected the European tradition, the jurisprudence has nevertheless been influenced, albeit unconsciously, by the institutional principles developed in the nineteenth century.
This challenging new work elucidates the meaning of the fair trial and in doing so challenges the conventional approach to the analysis of criminal procedure as based on the distinction between adversarial and inquisitorial procedural systems. The book is divided into two parts. The first part is dominated by an examination of the fair trial principles in the works of several notable European jurists of the nineteenth century, arguing that their writings were instrumental in the development of the principles underlying the modern conception of criminal proceedings. The second part looks at the fair trials jurisprudence of the ECHR and it is suggested that although the Court has neglected the European tradition, the jurisprudence has nevertheless been influenced, albeit unconsciously, by the institutional principles developed in the nineteenth century.
More details
Series
Edition
1. Auflage
Language
English
Place of publication
London
United Kingdom
Publishing group
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Target group
Professional and scholarly
ISBN-13
978-1-84731-375-1 (9781847313751)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions
Sarah J. Summers
Fair Trials
The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights
Book
08/2007
Hart Publishing
€126.28
Shipment within 15-20 days
Person
Sarah J Summers is Oberassistentin in criminal law and procedure,at the University of Zurich, Switzerland and a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law in Freiburg i Br, Germany.
Content
Part One
1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure
AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial/Accusatorial Divide
BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism
CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law
2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition
AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century
BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity'
CJudicial Impartiality
(i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in
France and Germany
(ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the
Examination of the Evidence
(iii) Institutional Impartiality
DThe Public Hearing Requirement
EImmediate and Oral Proceedings
(i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial
(ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and
Submitted in Writing
(iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial
System
FConclusions
3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century
AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused'
BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial
(i)The Presence of the Accused
(ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused
(a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party
(b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century
(c) The Assistance of Counsel
CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase
(i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative'
(a) The Questioning of the Accused
(b) The Examination of Evidence
(ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation
DConclusions
Part Two
4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR
AIntroduction
BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity'
CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine
DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the
Equality of Arms
EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in
Criminal Proceedings
(i)The Right to be Present at Trial
(ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions
(iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions
FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution
GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms
5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR
AIntroduction
BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence
CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview
DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d)
(i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses?
(a) The Identity of the Witness
(b) The Importance of the Witness
(ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined?
EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence
FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the
'Accusatorial Trinity'
(i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses
(ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses
(iii)Immediacy
G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination
(i) Improper Compulsion
(ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion
(iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel
(iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase
HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial'
(i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna
(ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires
(iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition
6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms
AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights
BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms
CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition
DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings
1. The Enduring Legacy of 'Inquisitorial' and 'Accusatorial' Procedural Forms in the Debate on Comparative Criminal Procedure
AThe Enduring Legacy of the Inquisitorial/Accusatorial Divide
BThe Connection to Legal Nationalism
CDeveloping a New Approach for Analysing European Criminal Procedure Law
2. The Origins of the European Criminal Procedural Tradition
AIntroduction: The Importance of the Developments of the Nineteenth Century
BThe Development of the 'Accusatorial Trinity'
CJudicial Impartiality
(i)The Separation of the Functions of 'Judging' and Prosecuting in
France and Germany
(ii) Impassivity or Activity: The Role of the English Judge in the
Examination of the Evidence
(iii) Institutional Impartiality
DThe Public Hearing Requirement
EImmediate and Oral Proceedings
(i) Immediate and Oral Examination of Evidence at Trial
(ii) Consideration at Trial of Evidence Collected before the Trial and
Submitted in Writing
(iii)Immediate and Oral Proceedings as Fundamental to the Accusatorial
System
FConclusions
3. The Rights of the Defence: Lessons from the Nineteenth Century
AThe Institutional Nature of the 'Rights of the Accused'
BThe Rights of the Defence at Trial
(i)The Presence of the Accused
(ii) Participatory Rights of the Accused
(a) The Developing Conception of the Accused as a Party
(b) Understanding the Nature of the Accused's Participatory Rights: The English Reforms of the Late Nineteenth Century
(c) The Assistance of Counsel
CThe Role of the Defence in the Pre-trial Phase
(i) The Pre-trial Phase as 'Investigative'
(a) The Questioning of the Accused
(b) The Examination of Evidence
(ii)The Determinative Reality of the Investigation
DConclusions
Part Two
4. Defining Fairness in Article 6(1) ECHR
AIntroduction
BIdentifying Vargha's 'Accusatorial Trinity'
CThe Role of the 'Equality of Arms' Doctrine
DThe Relationship between the Adversarial Procedure Requirement and the
Equality of Arms
EThe Court's Interpretation of the Adversarial Procedure Requirement in
Criminal Proceedings
(i)The Right to be Present at Trial
(ii)Knowledge of the Other Side's Submissions
(iii)Opportunity to Comment on the Other Side's Submissions
FThe Relationship between the Defence and the Prosecution
GFairness and Implied Procedural Forms
5. The Structure of the 'Trial' in Article 6 ECHR
AIntroduction
BThe Defence's Right to Challenge Witness Evidence
CWitness Evidence in Europe: An Overview
DRegulating Witness Evidence: Article 6(3)(d)
(i)What is an Adequate and Proper Opportunity to Challenge Witnesses?
(a) The Identity of the Witness
(b) The Importance of the Witness
(ii)When Should Witnesses be Examined?
EThe Importance of the Trial as the Forum for Confronting Witness Evidence
FReconciling Examination of Witnesses in the Investigation Phase with the
'Accusatorial Trinity'
(i)The Presence of Counsel during Pre-trial Examination of Witnesses
(ii)The Presence of an Impartial Supervisory Authority during the Examination of Witnesses
(iii)Immediacy
G The Privilege Against Self-incrimination
(i) Improper Compulsion
(ii) Indirect 'Acceptable' Compulsion
(iii) The Relationship between Compulsion and the Assistance of Counsel
(iv) The Privilege against Self-incrimination as a Substitute for the Refusal to Insist on Adversarial Principles in the Investigation Phase
HThe Root of the Problem: Defining the 'Trial'
(i)The Investigation Phase Lacuna
(ii)Explaining the Investigation Phase Lacuna: Les Travaux Préparatoires
(iii)Resolving the Fairness Deficit: Acknowledging the European Procedural Tradition
6. Reassessing Fairness in European Criminal Law: Procedural Fairness, Defence Rights and Institutional Forms
AProcedural Fairness as Individual Rights
BProcedural Rights and Institutional Forms
CArticle 6 ECHR and the European Criminal Procedural Tradition
DTowards an Institutional Understanding of Fairness in Criminal Proceedings
