Source Acknowledgments

The editors and publisher gratefully acknowledge the permission granted to reproduce the copyright material in this book:

1. Selections from Plato, Republic, VIII, trans. G.M.A. Grube and C.D.C. Reeve (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992), pp. 186–206, 210–12. Reprinted by permission of Hackett Publishing Company Inc. 2. Selections from Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, VI, trans. Terence Irwin (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985), pp. 151–159. Reprinted by permission of Hackett Publishing Company Inc., and from Metaphysics I, 1, trans. W.D. Ross, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon (New York: Random House, 1941), pp. 689–693. Copyright © Oxford University Press. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press. 3. Wolfgang Schadewaldt, “The Concepts of ‘Nature’ and ‘Technique’ according to the Greeks,” trans. William Carroll, in Research in Philosophy and Technology 2, ed. Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey (1979), pp. 159–171. Reprinted by kind permission of the author. 4. Francis Bacon, “Thoughts and Conclusions on the Interpretation of Nature as a Science Productive of Works,” trans. B. Farrington in The Philosophy of Francis Bacon (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1964), pp. 90–96 abridged; reprinted by permission of Liverpool University Press. “The Plan of the Work 6” and “Aphorisms Concerning the Interpretation of Nature and the Kingdom of Man,” from Novum Organum, trans. and ed. Peter Urbach and John Gibson (Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court Publishing, 1994), pp. 29, 43, 53–56, 202; © 1994, reprinted by permission of Open Court Publishing Company, a division of Carus Publishing Company, Chicago, IL. “On the Idols and on the Scientific Study of Nature,” from The New Atlantis, ed. Jerry Weinberge (Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson, Inc., rev. edn. 1989), pp. 71–74, 77, 79–83 abridged; copyright ©1980, 1989, reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, USA. “Sphinx; or Science” and “On the Reformation of Education” from “Translation of the ‘De Augmentis’,” in The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. J. Spedding, R.L. Ellis, and D.D. Heath (London: Longman, 1980), pp. 159–162 and 284–291, abridged. 5. From Immanuel Kant, On History, ed. and introd. L.W. Beck, trans. L.W. Beck, R.E. Anchor, and E.L. Fackenhelm (Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill, Inc. 1957), pp. 11–26. Reprinted by permission of Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved. 6. Auguste Comte, “Lesson One,” in Cours de philosophie positive, from Introduction to Positive Philosophy, ed. and trans. Frederick Ferré (Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA: Hackett, 1988), pp. 1–33. Reprinted by permission of Hackett Publishing Company Inc. All rights reserved. 7. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, “Final Reply,” from Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, in Collected Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, vol. 1, ed. Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly (Hanover, NH and London: University Press of New England, 1992), pp. 110–116. © University Press of New England, Lebanon, NH. Reprinted by permission. 8. Extracts from “The Labour-Process and the Process of Producing Surplus Value,” chapter VII in Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, ed. Frederick Engels (New York: International Publishers, 1967), pp. 173–177; reprinted by permission of International Publishers, New York. Extracts from Karl Marx, A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (New York: International Publishers, 1970), pp. 20–22; reprinted by permission of International Publishers, New York. Extracts from “Materialist Method” in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The German Ideology, ed. C.J. Arthur (New York: Inter­national Publishers), abridged from pp. 42–43, 46–49; reprinted by permission of International Publishers, New York. Friedrich Engels, “The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape to Man,” from Dialectics of Nature, 2nd edn., trans. Clemens Dutt (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1954), pp. 170–183. “On Authority,” in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Basic Writings on Politics and Philosophy, ed. Lewis S. Feuer (Garden City, NY: The Doubleday Broadway Publishing Group, 1959), pp. 481–485; reprinted with kind permission of Robin Feuer Miller. 9. Rudolf Carnap, Hans Hahn, and Otto Neurath, “The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle,” in Otto Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology, ed. M. Neurath and R. Cohen (1929/1973), pp. 299–318, abridged. Reprinted by permission of Springer. 10. Thomas Kuhn, “The Priority of Paradigms” and “Anomaly and the Emergence of Scientific Discoveries,” in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 43–65 (chs. 5 and 6). Reprinted by permission of University of Chicago Press. 11. Ian Hacking, “Experimentation and Scientific Realism,” from Philosophical Topics, 13 (1982), pp. 154–172. Copyright © by the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas. Reprinted with the permission of The Permissions Company Inc., on behalf of the University of Arkansas Press, www.uapress.com. 12. Patrick A. Heelan and Jay Schulkin, “Hermeneutical Philosophy and Pragmatism: A Philosophy of Science,” from Synthese, 115 (1998), pp. 269–302, omitting some references. Reprinted by permission of Springer. 13. Joseph Rouse, “What Are Cultural Studies of Science?,” from Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philosophically (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 237–259 (selections). Reprinted by permission of Cornell University Press. 14. Nancy Tuana, “Revaluing Science: Starting from the Practices of Women,” from Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, ed. L.H. Nelson and J. Nelson (Berlin: Springer, 1996), pp. 17–35. Reprinted by permission of Springer. 15. Sandra Harding, “Is Science Multicultural?,” from Configurations, 2/2 (1994), pp. 301–330. © 1994 The Johns Hopkins University Press and the Society for Literature and Science. Reprinted by permission of The Johns Hopkins University Press. 16. Shigehisa Kuriyama, “On Knowledge and the Diversity of Cultures: Comment on Harding,” Configurations, 2/2 (1994), pp. 337–342. © 1994 The Johns Hopkins University Press and the Society for Literature and Science. Reprinted by permission of The Johns Hopkins University Press. 17. Mario Bunge, “Philosophical Inputs and Outputs of Technology,” from The History of Philosophy and Technology, ed. George Bugliarello and Dean B. Doner (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979), pp. 262–281, abridged. Reprinted by kind permission of Ms. Virginia Bugliarello. 18. Maarten Franssen, “Analytic Philosophy of Technology,” from A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, ed. Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen et al. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), pp. 184–188. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 19. Jacques Ellul, “On the Aims of a Philosophy of Technology,” from The Technological Society (1954/64), trans. John Wilkinson (New York: Knopf; London: Jonathan Cape). Translation copyright © 1964 by Alfred A. Knopf, a division of Random House Inc. Reprinted by permission of Random House UK, and Random House, Inc. 20. Hans Jonas, “Toward a Philosophy of Technology,” Hastings Center Report 9/1 (1979). Copyright © The Hastings Center. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 21. Wendy Faulkner, “The Technology Question in Feminism,” from Women’s Studies International Forum, 24/1 (2001), pp. 79–95. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. 22. Mary Tiles and Hans Oberdiek, “Conflicting Visions of Technology,” in Living in a Technological Culture (London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 12–31. Reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Books. 23. Andrew Pickering, “The Mangle of Practice,” from Rethinking Objectivity:Contemporary Interventions, ed. Allan Megill (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994), pp. 109–125. 24. Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker, “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts,” from The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, ed. Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch (Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1987), pp. 17–22, 24–28, 46–50. © 1987 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, reproduced by permission of the MIT Press. 25. Bruno Latour, “Actor-Network Theory,” from “Introduction: How to Resume the Task of Tracing Associations,” in Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 5–25. Reprinted by permission of Oxford University...