
Metaphors for Education
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Person
Emmanuel Sander is a professor at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, in the field of School-based Intervention: Learning and Development, where he heads the IDEA (instruction, développement, éducation, apprentissage) laboratory.
Content
Introduction xi
Emmanuel SANDER
Part 1. Comparative Perspectives on Metaphors in Education 1
Chapter 1. Successes and Setbacks of Metaphors in Education 3
Emmanuel SANDER, Joanna BLOCHOWIAK and Yves GERBER
1.1. Introduction 3
1.2. The metaphoricity of antimetaphorics 5
1.3. The interpretive approach, the need to trust metaphors 8
1.4. Cognitive approaches to metaphor 11
1.4.1. Traditional approaches to metaphor 12
1.4.2. Contemporary approaches 14
1.5. Metaphorical uses by the great figures in education 21
1.6. Conclusion 26
1.7. References 28
Chapter 2. Metaphor: The Anchor and Driver of Conceptual Development 33
Emmanuel SANDER, Laura LEON PEREZ, Yves GERBER and Catherine RIVIER
2.1. Introduction 33
2.2. Beyond the classical approach to concepts: concepts have a heart 37
2.2.1. The classical approach to concepts: concepts as boxes 37
2.2.2. Prototypes at the heart of concepts 39
2.2.3. Abstract concept prototypes 40
2.3. School-taught or not, concepts out of boxes 43
2.3.1. Metaphors: props, obstacles and springboards for learning 44
2.3.2. The metaphors of arithmetical notions 46
2.4. Conceptual development from a lifespan perspective 49
2.4.1. Concepts developing throughout life 49
2.4.2. At the origin of the Mother Earth metaphor, a rise in abstraction 51
2.4.3. Some living things more living than others 53
2.5. Supporting conceptual development 55
2.5.1. Semantic recoding 55
2.5.2. Metaphorical framing in support of semantic recoding 58
2.6. Conclusion 62
2.7. References 64
Chapter 3. Teaching Metaphors and Pedagogical Conceptions 75
Katarina GVOZDIC and Catherine RIVIER
3.1. Introduction 75
3.2. Metaphorical collusions rich in inferences 77
3.2.1. Metaphors of teaching 77
3.2.2. Different metaphors, different inferences 79
3.3. The conceptions underlying teaching metaphors 82
3.3.1. Metaphors of transmission and participation 82
3.3.2. An intuitive conception of teaching 84
3.4. Not so dichotomous pedagogical practices 86
3.4.1. Pedagogies inspired by explicit instruction 87
3.4.2. The so-called "active" pedagogies 88
3.5. Metaphor as a driving force of transformation in teaching 91
3.5.1. An evolution in conceptions 92
3.5.2. Adapting one's teaching 94
3.6. Conclusion 95
3.7. References 97
Part 2. The Transformative Potential of Metaphors in Educational Practices 103
Chapter 4. Metaphors of Assessment Practices: The Diversity and Evolution of Teachers' Evaluative Stances 105
Katarina GVOZDIC, Stéphanie NAUD and Walther TESSARO
4.1. Introduction 105
4.2. Classroom assessment practices: from measurement to professional judgment 107
4.2.1. A problematic subjectivity 107
4.2.2. An assumed subjectivity 109
4.3. The teacher's assessment activity seen through metaphors 112
4.4. Investigating assessment stances in preservice teachers 115
4.4.1. Presentation of the study 116
4.4.2. Results 118
4.4.3. Perspectives 120
4.5. Conclusion 121
4.6. References 123
Chapter 5. Differentiation Through the Lens of Metaphors 131
Stéphanie NAUD
5.1. Introduction 131
5.2. Differentiation: an extended conceptual framework 134
5.2.1. Differentiation and educational justice 134
5.2.2. Student diversity or heterogeneity 139
5.2.3. Conceptions of difference and of intelligence 142
5.3. Metaphors of differentiation practices 145
5.3.1. Applicationist approach versus regulatory approach 145
5.3.2. Scaffolding: a form of regulation with multiple metaphorical sources 148
5.4. Deviation and change of course 151
5.5. Conclusion 155
5.6. References 157
Chapter 6. Metaphors for Developing Teacher Professional Identity 169
Géry MARCOUX and Nilima CHANGKAKOTI
6.1. Introduction 169
6.2. Thinking about and developing the teacher's professional identity 172
6.2.1. An identity under construction 172
6.2.2. Identity tensions and strategies for preservation or transformation 173
6.2.3. Roles inseparable from identity 174
6.3. Methods designed to understand and support the development of teachers' professional identity 175
6.3.1. Metaphors about in-service teachers 176
6.3.2. Metaphors in teacher training 177
6.3.3. Evaluation of two proven methods to understand the complexity of the profession 184
6.4. Conclusion 187
6.5. References 189
Chapter 7. Metaphors and Reflective Practice in Teaching 195
Yves GERBER and Géry MARCOUX
7.1. Introduction 195
7.2. Addressing professional complexity through reflexivity 197
7.3. Metaphors: tools for reflexivity 199
7.3.1. Formats promoting reflection 199
7.3.2. Levels, or thresholds of reflexivity 200
7.3.3. Use of metaphors in sustaining reflective practice 201
7.3.4. Models conducive to the use of metaphors 203
7.4. Using metaphors in order to develop reflexivity 206
7.4.1. Analyzing metaphors 207
7.4.2. Generating metaphors 207
7.4.3. Proposing metaphors 210
7.4.4. Comparing two metaphors 211
7.4.5. Implementation and limits of metaphorical usages for the development of reflexivity 211
7.5. Conclusion 213
7.6. References 214
List of Authors 221
Index 223
Introduction
Emmanuel SANDER
IDEA, Université de Genève, Switzerland
The postulate of educability, a fundamental principle in educational sciences, legitimizes the very existence of this field. It confers upon each individual a capacity to learn, progress and increase their autonomy and well-being. The idea that a person is immutable is therefore rejected in favor of a view that sees humans as constantly transforming and being transformed by their activities in the world and with their peers. This dynamic vision, inherent in any educational approach and closely tied to the role of metaphor in human thought, sets the direction for this book. Indeed, if we trace the etymology of the word, a metaphor is transformative by its very nature, because it "carries beyond": from µeta (meta) "beyond" and fe?? (pherô) "carry"1. As Fontanier (1977) describes metaphor, "we transfer, so to speak, a word from an idea to which it is assigned, to a different idea, whose resemblance to the first idea is appropriately highlighted by this word" (p. 261). Insofar as any educational approach is based on transformation and every use of metaphor triggers transfer, the synergy is clear: by initiating transfer, metaphor contributes to the transformation of the human being.
Many questions then arise about metaphors: the nature of the transfer they enable, their alignment with educational goals, the possibility of orienting them, understanding their desirable effects and anticipating potential drawbacks. Another key issue, central to education, is their practical application - how metaphors can be effectively used in teaching.
I.1. Analogy, metaphor's great weapon
Let us first look at the nature of the transfers initiated by metaphor. These shifts are far from random - metaphors do not lead just anywhere. Rather, they follow a well-defined mechanism: an "analogical relationship", already noted by Aristotle (1967) in his Poetics, which "makes it possible to understand a situation [the target] in terms of a different situation [the source]" (Holyoak and Thagard 1995, p. 5). Fontanier's previously mentioned quote further explains this fundamental property of metaphor, describing how a word transfers an idea to which it is associated to another idea, emphasizing their shared resemblance.
For example, the metaphor of the goldsmith applied to a chef, as in the expression THIS COOK IS A GOLDSMITH2, transfers the idea associated with the word goldsmith to a similar idea applicable to a chef. The goal here is to convey a sense of precision, meticulousness, as well as aesthetics and even the artistic skills of the chef. We should note that this transfer is not symmetrical. A clear distinction must be made between the source, which provides the interpretative framework, and the target, which is the object of the transfer conveyed by the source (Glucksberg and Keysar 1990). This is why the metaphors MY BUTCHER (TARGET) IS A SURGEON (SOURCE) and MY SURGEON (TARGET) IS A BUTCHER (SOURCE) communicate radically different ideas. One attributes the surgeon's precision and expertise to a butcher, while the other projects the butcher's supposed brutality and lack of precision onto a surgeon. In all cases, analogy is an inherent part of metaphor. It is explicitly expressed in formulations such as THIS COOK (TARGET) IS A GOLDSMITH (SOURCE). It is also found in so-called conceptual metaphors, from which many common expressions are derived. For instance, the metaphor DEBATING (TARGET) IS COMBATTING (SOURCE) leads to depicting a debater as offensive or to be taking refuge behind an argument, or sticking to their guns.
The interweaving of analogy and metaphor reinforces the relevance of exploring in depth the influence of metaphors in education and leveraging them for intervention purposes. Indeed, research has shown that analogies are ubiquitous in human cognition, shaping everything from basic cognitive processes - like choosing a word in daily conversation - to complex achievements such as scientific discoveries and artistic creations (Gentner et al. 2001; Gentner and Maravilla 2018). These studies emphasize how individuals rely on past experiences to navigate the present. Analogy therefore has a major adaptive value. By leveraging similarity, it allows us to draw upon the wealth of the past at low cognitive cost. By mobilizing analogy, metaphor thus serves as a privileged gateway to this process of capitalizing on experience by connecting the new with the familiar.
I.2. Metaphoric seduction: apparent precision under cover of coherence
More than the accuracy of a metaphor, it is its fruitfulness that deserves attention. To borrow from statistician George Box's famous quote - "all models are wrong, but some are useful" (1987, p. 424) - one could similarly argue that the usefulness of a metaphor outweighs any claim to absolute, and ultimately illusory, truth. Whether the teacher be conceived as a CAPTAIN, a GARDENER, a MUSE, a SCULPTOR or some other figure, what matters is the nature of the analogical transfer each metaphor evokes. Depending on the preferred metaphor, the teacher may thus guide, cultivate, inspire or shape their students.
Moreover, metaphor is, in a way, effortless - or at least, it can be created with little cost. After all, nothing prevents one from pairing two terms and stating their truth with conviction: "Life is like a bicycle: in order to keep your balance, you must keep moving"3. However, simply linking a source and a target does not guarantee the accuracy of the statement. Like proverbs, metaphors offer interpretative frameworks that can sometimes contradict one another: "The habit does not the monk make", but "there is no smoke without fire"; "Like father like son", but "a miserly father makes a prodigal son"; "It is better to be alone than in bad company", but "the more, the merrier". What seems like a contradiction in these proverbs reflects how each one directs attention to a different aspect of a situation. Paradoxically, opposing statements can both be useful: "The habit does not the monk make" is exhorting us to be wary of appearances, while "There is no smoke without fire" invites us to dig deeper to find out more. Both perspectives can be valuable. The fecundity of a metaphor lies in the inferences it generates, each guiding thought in a different direction. Just as the proverb "like father like son" does not lead to the same expectations as "a miserly father makes a prodigal son", the metaphor of the CAPTAIN and GARDENER have different orientations. Ultimately, every metaphor creates a sense of coherence by linking the target and the source. However, its relevance is tested against the recipient's experience and the contrast between what the metaphor implies and what is actually observed.
I.3. Pedagogical uses of metaphor
Historically, logical reasoning has long been regarded as the prerogative of human thinking and as the dividing line from the modes of thinking of other species of animal. This belief reinforced a Cartesian perspective, leading to the idea that education should be built around logical reasoning. But since much research has debunked the notion that humans are uniquely defined by logical thinking (Georges 1997), the door is now open to pedagogical paths beyond those advocating logic as the preferred direction.
As such, metaphor, which frees thought from the constraints of logic, gains renewed pedagogical legitimacy. It can convey ideas or challenge biases with striking immediacy, offering teachers an accessible and powerful range of resources in the classroom. Once adherence to the laws of logic is no longer treated as an absolute, the value of metaphor thus appears in at least two ways. First, it gives teachers insight into the hidden workings of students' minds - and their own - both rooted in unconscious metaphors. Second, rather than relying on logical reasoning, which may not always be accessible or effective, metaphors help to shift students' thinking by tapping into their potentially infinite pool of prior knowledge. This prior knowledge then serves as a foundation for understanding new situations through the richness of accumulated experience.
Thus, despite all the missteps to which it can lead, metaphor holds several undeniable virtues from an educational perspective. First, the virtue of serving as a vehicle, making transfer possible, and then connecting to a specific situation the wealth of past experiences and accumulated knowledge built throughout an individual's life. An individual's entire past becomes a resource for interpreting their present through the diversity of concepts they have developed. Moreover, a metaphor generates a transformative dynamic akin to a form of perpetual motion or a virtuous cycle: the situations it transforms become, in turn, transformative, and can thus be useful for new situations that arise from the enrichment initiated by the metaphor.
I.4. Organization of the book
This book is structured into seven chapters. The first three chapters focus on broad theoretical issues: the first...
System requirements
File format: ePUB
Copy protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (not Kindle).
The file format ePub works well for novels and non-fiction books – i.e., „flowing” text without complex layout. On an e-reader or smartphone, line and page breaks automatically adjust to fit the small displays.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our ebook Help page.