
Argumentation and Health
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
This book is of interest to argumentation theorists, (health) communication scholars, healthcare practitioners, students of medicine and health-related fields, and all other researchers and practitioners interested in the function and characteristics of argumentation in health communication. Originally published in Journal of Argumentation in Context, Vol. 1:1 (2012).
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Persons
Content
- Argumentation and Health
- Editorial page
- Title page
- LCC data
- Table of contents
- Argumentation in the healthcare domain
- Argumentation and informed consent in the doctor-patient relationship
- Introduction
- Reibl v. Hughes
- The law and bioethics of informed consent
- The asymmetry of the doctor-patient relationship
- Preserving the balance of SDM in the informed consent interaction
- The circularity of 'competent to consent'
- References
- Institutional constraints on strategic maneuvering in shared medical decision-making
- 1. Shared decision making
- 2. Comparison of the ideal of shared decision making with the concept of critical discussion
- 3. Strategic maneuvering in the physician's presentation of treatments
- 3.1 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that the patient seems to participate in the decision making process about the best treatment
- 3.2 Presenting the available treatment options in such a way that the treatment preferred by the doctor seems to be the most reasonable option
- 3.3 Presenting the recommendation in such a way that it looks as if the decision is completely up to the patient
- 4. Conclusion
- References
- Reasonableness of a doctor's argument by authority
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Argumentation in medical consultation
- 3. Authority argumentation
- 4. Soundness of a doctor's argument by authority
- General soundness conditions
- Specific soundness conditions
- 5. Conclusion
- References
- Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations
- 1. The social context of the medical consultation in Italy
- 1.1 The Rigotti and Rocci model for the description of the communication context
- 1.2 The institutionalized dimension of the medical consultation in Italy
- 2. Evaluating argumentation in medical consultations
- Extract #1
- Extract #2
- Extract #3
- 3. Concluding remarks
- References
- Teaching argumentation theory to doctors
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The 2012 medical consultation
- 2.1 Patient-centeredness as a philosophy
- 2.2 Shared decision-making as a model
- 2.3 Informed consent as a process
- 3. What does not work, what works, what is needed
- 4. Conclusion
- References
- Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Intrinsic and extrinsic constraints on argumentative discourse
- 3. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements
- 4. DTCA as an argumentative activity type
- 5. Example: Nexium advertisement
- 6. Conclusion
- References
- The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures
- 1. Introduction
- 2. A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation
- 3. Dialectical options in the argumentation stage
- 4. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint
- 4.1 Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation
- 4.2 Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation
- 5. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism
- 6. Choosing pragmatic argumentation to attack opposing standpoints
- 7. Conclusion
- References
- Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Myriad patient education tool
- 2.1 Argumentation
- 2.2 Presentation
- 3. Other viewpoints
- 3.1 Kaiser permanente member brochure
- 3.2 NCI fact sheet
- 4. Challenges for healthcare consumers
- 5. Implications for computer systems
- References
- "It is about our body, our own body!"
- 1. Background: Breast cancer screening in Holland
- 2. Research question
- 3. Setup and procedure of the qualitative study
- 4. Disagreeing and agreeing with the health communicator
- 5. Explaining the failure of the leaflet
- 6. Improving the leaflet?
- References
- Appendix. Example of leaflet message in Experiment 3
- Name Index
- Subject Index
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.