
The Reform of EC Competition Law
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Intro
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Summary of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Foreword: The Reform of EC Competition Law: The Challenge of an Optimal Enforcement System
- Preface
- List of Abbreviations
- Part I: Institutional Aspects
- Section A: The Design of an Optimal Competition Law Enforcement Regime
- Chapter 1: Welfare-Based Optimal Legal Standards: A Brief Review of Theory and Applications
- I Introduction
- A Decision Errors of Legal Rules
- B Indirect (Deterrence) Effects of Legal Rules
- C Procedural Effects of Decision Rules
- II Choosing Legal Standards: Some Limitations of Existing Analyses
- III Choosing Legal Standards: A Welfare-Based Approach
- IV An Application to Refusals to License IPs and Microsoft
- V Concluding Remarks
- Chapter 2: Private Enforcement: Current Situation and Methods of Improvement
- I Introduction
- II The Basis for Damages Actions in EC Law
- III The Situation in the Member States
- IV Determining the forum
- V Establishing the Claim
- A Discovery
- B Making Prior Decisions Binding
- VI Fault
- VII Damages
- A Punitive Damages
- B The Passing-on Defence
- VIII Collective Actions
- IX Costs
- X Conclusion
- Chapter 3: An EU Competition Court: The Continuing Debate
- I The Last Twenty Years: How We Got Here
- A Setting up of the CFI
- B The Increasing Workload
- C Changes to the Rules of Procedure
- D Structural Reform: Judicial Panels and the European CST
- E The House of Lords Report 2007
- II Where Are We Now?
- III Where Should We Go from Here?
- A The House of Lords Report
- B Specialized Chambers?
- IV The Wider Picture
- A Increasing Workload, Delay, Dilution?
- B Judicial Review and Fundamental Rights
- C Modernization: No Coherent Appellate Structure
- V Looking Ahead: A Tentative Conclusion
- Section B: Concurrent Proceedings in National and EC Competition Law
- Chapter 4: Case Allocation in Antitrust and Collaboration between the National Competition Authorities and the European Commission
- I Introduction
- II Case Allocation within the Network
- A Lack of Binding Allocation Rules
- 1 Centre of Gravity
- 2 Best-Placed v. Well-Placed Authority
- B Initial Allocation Period
- C Exchange of Information
- III Conflicts of Jurisdiction under the Allocation System
- A Positive and Negative Conflicts
- B Unpredictability of Penalties
- IV Procedural Rights of the Parties
- A The Right to a Fair Hearing
- B The Right to a Fair Administrative Procedure
- C The Right to a Fair Trial
- 1 Review of Article 11, Paragraph 6 Decisions
- 2 Review of Article 13 Decisions
- 3 Review of Other Decisions
- D Access to the File
- E Legal Representation and the Protection of the Confidentiality of Lawyer-Client Communications
- F The Protection Against Self-Incrimination
- G The Principle of 'ne bis in idem'
- V Conclusion
- Chapter 5: The Role of Arbitration in Competition Disputes
- I Introduction
- II Competition between the Arbitrator and the National Judge
- A Evolution in Law
- 1 Stability of the Conditions Required by National Arbitration Law
- 2 Amendment of the Limits Imposed by Competition Law
- B Evolution in Practice
- 1 Limitation of Specialized Authorities' Intervention
- 2 The Contracting Parties' Wariness Towards Ordinary National Courts
- III The Organization of Relationships between the Arbitrator and Other 'Competition Authorities'
- A Cooperation Relationships
- 1 Autonomous Proceedings
- 2 Successive and Parallel Proceedings
- B Scrutiny Relationships
- 1 Ignorance of Competition Law
- 2 Erroneous Application of Competition Law
- IV Conclusions
- Chapter 6: Modernization and the Role of National Courts: Institutional Choices, Power Relations, and Substantive Implications
- I Introduction
- II Decentralization Versus Uniform Application: A Delicate Trade-off
- A The Shift to a Decentralized System and Its Counterbalances
- B The Impact on Institutional and Procedural Autonomy
- III The Relationship between Competition Authorities and National Courts: The Mixing of Roles
- IV The Substantive Impact: The Standards of Application of Article 81 EC
- V Conclusion
- Section C: Optimal Sanctions and Their Limitations
- Chapter 7: Optimal Antitrust Enforcement: From Theory to Policy Options
- I Introduction
- II The Economic Model of Law Enforcement
- III Limitations of the Model
- IV Insights from the Model
- V Conclusion
- Chapter 8: Tools for an Optimal Enforcement of European Antitrust Law: Examples of Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines and on Commitment Proceedings. Is the European Commission Right?
- I Introduction
- II Guidelines on the Method of Setting Fines Imposed Pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No. 1/2003
- A The Need for Transparency Countered by the Retention of Wide Discretion
- 1 The Need for Transparency
- 2 The Commission's Intention to Strengthen Its Discretion
- 3 The CFI and The ECJ's Position: Discretion v. Consistent Policy
- B Uncertainties Resulting from the 2006 Guidelines
- 1 Methodology to Set the Fines
- 2 The Uncertainties Surrounding the Methodology of the 2006 Guidelines and Its Application
- a Uncertainty Regarding Whether Application of the Methodology of the 2006 Guidelines is Appropriate
- b Uncertainties Surrounding the Methodology Set Down by the 2006 Guidelines
- III The Commission's Commitment Proceedings Policy
- A The Commitment Proceedings Before the Commission: Theoretical Aspects
- 1 The Commitment Proceedings within the System of Community Proceedings
- 2 The Inherent Risks in the Commitment Proceedings
- B The Commission's Jurisprudence
- IV Conclusion
- Chapter 9: Protecting Human Rights in the Context of European Antitrust Criminalization
- I Introduction
- A Background
- B Aims and Layout
- II The Normative Position of Human Rights in the Context of European Antitrust Criminalization
- A Accommodating Human Rights within a Theoretical Model of Antitrust Criminalization
- B Deterrence as an Objective of Criminalization
- C Acknowledging a 'Plurality' of Values
- D A Compromise Model
- III The Principle of Legality and its Effect on the Substance of Criminal Antitrust Laws
- A The Concept of Legality
- B 'Sleeping giants' and Legality
- C Legal Certainty in Definition
- IV Due Process and European Antitrust Criminalization
- A Due Process as a European Right
- B Strengthening of Procedural Rights
- 1 Standard of Proof
- 2 Right against Self-incrimination
- 3 Consequences of Strengthening Rights
- C Division of Functions
- D Exchange of Information
- E Ne Bis in Idem
- V Conclusion
- Part II: The Challenges of Economic Evidence
- Chapter 10: 'Judging' Economists: Economic Expertise in Competition Law Litigation A European View
- I Introduction
- II Expert Evidence in the Courtroom: Origins and Problems
- A The Origins of Expertise: Informational Asymmetry and Epistemic Competence
- B Science, Objectivity, and the Specific Nature of Economic Expertise
- 1 The Evolution of Acceptable Methods of Observation as a Limit to the Demarcation Criterion of Empiricism
- 2 The Possibility of Deductive Science as a Criticism to the Demarcation Criterion of Induction
- 3 The Elusive Demarcation Criterion of Facts-Based Reasoning Versus Theory/Abstract Reasoning
- 4 Scientific Practice as a Limit to the Demarcation Criterion of Scientific Consensus
- 5 Pragmatism as a Limit to the Demarcation Criterion of Objectivity
- C The Development of an Economic Science for Litigation: Implications for the Evolution of Research in Antitrust Economics
- III Economic Expertise in Competition Law: Scope and Implications
- A The Legal Relevance of Economic Expertise in EC Competition Law
- B The Many Faces of Economic Evidence in Competition Law
- 1 Economic 'Facts'
- 2 Economic Transplants
- 3 Economic Authority
- 4 Economic 'Laws'
- IV Points of Entry of Economic Expertise in the Courtroom: A Comparative Institutional Analysis
- A Expert Witnesses
- B Court-Appointed Experts
- C Hybrid Options
- 1 Assessors and Special Juries
- 2 Amicus curiae or Advice from the Competition Authorities
- 3 Internal Economic Expertise (Clerks, Research, and Documentation Units in Courts Formed by Economists)
- 4 Specialized or Trans-Disciplinary Courts
- V Substantive Assessment of Economic Expertise
- A Admissibility of Economic Expertise: The Exclusionary Ethos
- 1 The Emergence of the Gatekeeping Role of the Judge
- 2 The Application of the Daubert Rules in Competition Law Litigation
- 3 A Critical Assessment of the Daubert Test
- B Assessment and Sufficiency of Economic Expertise: The Discursive Ethos
- 1 Attaching Weight to Economic Evidence as a Filter for a More Extensive Competition Law Assessment
- a The Development of Procedures Requiring the Weighing of Economic Evidence: Summary Judgments and the Expansion of the Plausible Economics Inquiry
- b How to Determine the Evidential Weight of Economic Evidence?
- 2 The Determination of the Standard of Proof
- a A Probabilistic Account of Standards of Proof (Persuasion) for Economic Evidence
- b Relative Plausibility Theory and Standards of Proof (Persuasion)
- VI Conclusion
- Part III: Vertical Aspects
- Section A: Competition Law Policy in Markets with Non-conventional Price-Formation Mechanisms
- Chapter 11: Antitrust Issues in Dynamic Markets
- I Introduction
- II Endogenous Market Structures and Competition Policy
- III Toward a Reform of Antitrust Policy for Dynamic Markets
- IV Predatory Pricing
- V Intellectual Property Rights Policy
- VI An Application: The Dynamic Market for Online Advertising
- VII Conclusions
- Chapter 12: Antitrust Issues in Network Industries
- I Introduction
- II The Logic of Competition Law in the United States and the European Union
- III Markets with Network Effects
- A Sources of Network Effects and the Reversal of the Law of Demand
- B Critical Mass
- IV Features of Markets with Network Effects
- A Ability to Charge Prices on Both Sides of a Network
- B Network Effects may or may not be Internalized
- C Fast Network Expansion
- D Perfect Competition is Inefficient
- E Incompatibility as a Strategic Weapon
- F Inequality of Market Shares and Profits
- G Monopoly may Maximize Total Surplus
- H In Networks, Market Inequality can Exist without Anti-competitive Acts
- I In Network Industries, Free Entry Does Not Lead to Perfect Competition
- J Imposing an Egalitarian Market Structure Is Likely to be Counter productive
- K Nature of Competition is Different in Network Industries
- L Path-Dependence
- V Competition Policy Issues in Network Industries
- A Interconnection Issues in One-Sided Bottlenecks
- B Interconnection Issues in Two-Sided Bottlenecks
- C Market Power Creation Specific to Networks: The Importance of Technical Standards
- D Vertical Integration and Vertical Control Issues in Network Industries
- E Dynamic Efficiency Issues
- F Innovation Issues
- G Criteria to Be Used for Antitrust Intervention in Network Industries
- H Criteria to Be Used for Remedies
- VI Concluding Remarks
- Chapter 13: EC Competition Law and Parallel Trade in Pharmaceutical Products
- I Introduction
- II The Factual Background: The Greek Example
- III The Specific Legal and Economic Context of the Pharmaceutical Sector Sets it Apart from Other Industries
- A State Regulation and Public Service Obligations
- B The Benefits of Parallel Trade cannot be Presumed to Accrue to Customers and End Consumers
- IV The GSK Cases
- A Article 81 EC
- B Article 82 EC
- V Comment
- A Article 81 EC
- B Article 82 EC
- 1 The Definition of the Relevant Market and Dominance
- 2 Abuse
- VI Conclusion
- Section B: Abuse of a Dominant Position
- Chapter 14: Exclusionary Abuses and the Justice of 'Competition on the Merits'
- I Introduction
- II The Exquisite Problem
- III The Different Enforcement Approaches
- IV Some Suggestions Based on Merit and Justice
- Chapter 15: The Implementation of an Effects-Based Approach under Article 82: Principles and Application
- I Introduction
- II Different Approaches to Designing Rules for the Analysis of Exclusionary Conduct
- III An Effects-Based Approach to Analyse Unilateral Conduct by Dominant Firms
- IV Predation: The American Airlines Case
- V Input Foreclosure
- VI Rebates
- VII Conclusion
- Section C: Mergers
- Chapter 16: Critical Analysis of the ECMR Reform
- I Introduction
- II Jurisdictional Reform
- A Member State Referrals to the Commission
- B Referrals to Member States
- C Article 9 ECMR, Post-Notification Referrals upon Request by Member States
- D Pre-Notification Referrals upon Request by the Merging Parties
- E Company Requests for Pre-Notification Referral to the Commission
- III Procedural Reform
- A Pre-Notification Consultations
- B State of Play and Triangular Meetings
- C Discussion of Remedies
- D Other Procedural Innovations
- IV Substantive Reform
- V Case Law Analysis
- A Oracle/PeopleSoft
- 1 Analysis of the Case
- 2 A Gap Case?
- B Sony/BMG
- 1 Analysis of the Case
- 2 A Gap Case?
- VI Market Structure Conducive to 'Gap' Cases
- VII Conclusion
- Annex 1
- Chapter 17: On the Economics of Non-horizontal Mergers
- I Introduction
- II Vertically-Related Firms and Markets
- A Vertical Chains
- B Pre- and Post-Chicago Views
- III Main Economic Effects in Vertical Structures
- A Double Marginalization: The Basic Vertical Externality and Solutions
- B Equilibrium Pricing Incentives with Strategic Pricing
- C Quality and Specific Investments
- D Dynamics
- E General Lessons from the Theoretical and Empirical Analyses
- IV Non-horizontal and Non-vertical Cases
- V Economic Analysis Behind Non-horizontal Merger Guidelines
- VI The Possible Roles of the Non-horizontal Merger Guidelines
- VII Conclusion
- Section D: Cartels
- Chapter 18: An Optimal Enforcement System against Cartels
- I What is Special About Cartels?
- II What is Special About the Enforcement of Cartel Rules?
- III Detecting and Proving Secret Cartels
- IV Timely Punishment: Sanctions
- V Is There Such a Thing as an Optimal System to Enforce the Cartel Prohibition?
- Chapter 19: The ECN and the Model Leniency Programme
- I Introduction: Antitrust Enforcement in the Pre-modernization Era 505
- II The European Competition Network and Its Functioning
- A An Integrated and Flexible Enforcement System
- B Exchange of Information
- C Work Sharing
- D Coherent Application of Antitrust Rules
- E Achievements of the ECN Network
- III The Model Leniency Programme
- A The Implications of ECN Cooperation for National Leniency Programs
- B Remedies Adopted in the Network Notice
- C The Adoption of the Model Leniency Programme
- D The Principles of Leniency Harmonization
- E The Summary Application System
- F The Results of the MLP
- IV Conclusion
- Section E: State Action and EC Competition Law
- Chapter 20: The Community State Aid Action Plan and the Challenge of Developing an Optimal Enforcement System
- I Introduction
- II Enforcement of EU State Aid Control
- A Less and Better Targeted State Aid
- B Effective Procedures, Better Enforcement, Higher Predictability and Transparency
- C Shared Responsibility between the Commission and the Member States
- D Greater Emphasis on Economic Analysis
- III State Aid Under the EU Treaty
- A Transfer of State Resources
- B Economic Advantage
- C Selectivity
- D Effects on Trade Between Member States
- IV Assessment of State Aid Compatibility with the EU Market
- A Negative Effects of State Aid
- B Positive Effects of State Aid
- V Concluding Remarks
- Chapter 21: EU Competition Policy for Rescuing and Restructuring Companies
- I Introduction
- II Meaning of 'a Firm in Difficulty'
- III Rescue or Restructuring?
- IV Compatibility with the Common Market
- A Application of Article 87(3) EC
- B Rescue Aid
- C Restructuring Aid
- 1 Restoration of Long-term Viability
- 2 Avoidance of Undue Distortions of Competition
- 3 Real Contribution of the Aid Beneficiary
- 4 Full Implementation of Restructuring Plan
- D The 'One Time, Last Time' Principle
- V Final Remarks
- Chapter 22: State Aid Law Claims in Merger Control
- I Introduction
- II EC Case-Law
- A The Matra Doctrine: Origins and Recent Developments
- B The RJB Mining Case: The Matra Doctrine in a Merger Control Context
- C The BaByliss Judgment: A Step Back from RJB Mining ?
- III Commission Practice Post-RJB Mining
- A RAG II
- B The Hellenic Shipyard Cases
- C Metronet/Infraco
- D Deutsche Post/DHL(II) and Deutsche Post/Exel
- E Iberdrola/Scottish Power
- F ENEL/EMS
- IV Concluding Remarks
- List of Contributors
System requirements
File format: ePUB
Copy protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (not Kindle).
The file format ePub works well for novels and non-fiction books – i.e., „flowing” text without complex layout. On an e-reader or smartphone, line and page breaks automatically adjust to fit the small displays.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our ebook Help page.