Bitstreams

Reviews / Votes

"Kirschenbaum is both a wordsmith and storyteller at heart. It's as evident in his necessarily speculative approach to the bits and bytes of his chosen archives as in his style of writing. He engages the reader with witty asides, tangential flights of fancy, and extended fictional examples that help concretize the abstractness of digital archaeology...With his careful threading together of wide-ranging examples, Kirschenbaum demonstrates how we can incorporate an attentiveness to the digital details of textual production (what he elsewhere calls digital forensics) into the humanities, and convincingly argues why we must do so now." (Los Angeles Review of Books) "[B]eautifully written and thoroughly researched...Kirschenbaum's book rests precisely in that uncertain, speculative gap between the bitstream and its readers, between literary heritage and literary experience, between intention and act. His is a wonderfully literary exploration of the glorious mess of bookish media and mediated archives now, required reading for the next generation of digital archivists, bibliographers, and textual scholars." (Textual Cultures) "With clear and spare language that deftly breaks down complex concepts for non-specialists without sacrificing the nuance for disciplinary specialists, Bitstreams is an impressive example of how to speak across audiences (e.g., archivists, literary scholars, historians) and undertake the work of translation that is necessary to make the digital legible to the literary and vice versa." (Information & Culture) "Bistreams is necessary reading for scholars interested in the intersection of digital and literary studies, media and textuality. Kirschenbaum makes his case in this book, and across his career effectively: to attend to the digital literary, one must attend to the materiality of that media, to understand enabling friction of the material, and to attend to print, one must attend to the ways in which books are bound up in media ecologies, including digital platforms and technologies." (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities) "How should scholars of literature, textual criticism, and bibliography contend with the complex materiality of the digital data and platforms that constitute the contemporary literary archive? This is the guiding question that animates Matthew G. Kirschenbaum' s excellent Bitstreams...[A]n essential account of [a] portion of digital history and a practical and theoretical foundation that will doubtless remain relevant to bibliography and literary studies, whatever forms future bitstreams may take." (ASAP Journal) "Matthew Kirschenbaum has almost single-handedly taught us how to read digital objects as material texts. Now, in this field-defining achievement, he shows us the future of bibliography. Like the works of D. F. McKenzie before it, Bitstreams will be required reading for generations to come." (Whitney Trettien, University of Pennsylvania)