
Spares, Repairs and Intellectual Property Rights
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
form the basis of many legitimate businesses, many manufacturing enterprises
seek to augment the competitive advantage realized at the market stage of
selling their main products by attempting to monopolize the market for spares,
repairs and refills. Increasingly, companies are using intellectual property
laws to devise up-front business strategies to gain exclusive rights in the
components of their products.
This is the first in-depth analysis of the law in this relatively new and
rapidly developing area of practice. It sheds clear light on the conflicting
interests of manufacturers, consumers, spare parts makers and the general
public; explores the extent to which this kind of business strategy can be
more or less successful with respect to the different rights involved, and in
different jurisdictions; and highlights the competition issues that inevitably
arise. The essays included are revised and updated versions of papers
presented at the seventh (2006) of the innovative IP conference organized
annually by the Macau Institute of European Studies (IEEM) on intellectual
property law and the economic challenges for Asia.
Among the topics and issues covered are the following:
;
-
notions of 'repair' and 'recycle' and their legal effects;
-
the limits of IP rights in relation to repair and recycle;
-
legal limits of end user licence agreements (EULAs) and technological
protection measures (TPMs);
-
patent exhaustion on repair and recycling;
-
alteration of product 'identity';
-
the concept of 'indirect' or 'contributory' infringement;
-
design law strategies; and
-
secondary market definitions.
The authors give detailed attention to cases in various jurisdictions that
have guided and continue to guide business strategies in the field.
Jurisdictions treated include the EU, the US, the UK, Germany, the
Netherlands, China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Korea.
In its clarification of the limits and possibilities of business strategies in
this area of competition that is just beginning to attract attention, this
book will be of great value not only to intellectual property law
practitioners but to business people in nearly any field of production,
especially where cross-border marketing is involved.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Cover
- Half Title Page
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- Abstract
- Summary of Contents
- Table of Contents
- Preface
- About the Authors and Editors
- Part 1 General Overview: Balancing Interests of IP Owners and the General Public
- Chapter 1 Right Holders' Control over Repair and Reconditioning
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. THE EU REGIME: REGISTERED AND UNREGISTERED DESIGN
- A. THE DESIGN DIRECTIVE
- B. THE COMMUNITY DESIGN REGULATION
- C. THE PROPOSAL FOR AMENDING THE DESIGN DIRECTIVE
- III. THE UK REGIME
- A. THE UK REGISTERED DESIGN ACT
- B. UNREGISTERED DESIGNS
- IV. SPARE PARTS AND TRADEMARKS
- V. PATENTS
- Chapter 2 Repair and Recycle between IP Rights, End User License Agreements and Encryption
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS
- A. NOTIONS OF 'REPAIR' AND 'RECYCLE' AND THEIR LEGAL EFFECTS
- B. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS' LIMITS IN RELATION WITH REPAIR AND RECYCLE
- 1. Copyright Law
- a. Europe
- b. The United States
- 2. Patent Law
- a. Europe
- b. The United States
- 3. Design Law
- a. Europe
- b. The United States
- 4. Trademark Law
- a. Europe
- b. The United States
- III. BLOCKING REPAIR THROUGH END USER LICENSE AGREEMENTS AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROTECTION MEASURES
- A. COPYRIGHT LAW
- 1. Europe
- 2. The United States
- B. PATENT LAW
- 1. Europe
- 2. The United States
- C. DESIGN LAW
- 1. Europe
- 2. The United States
- D. TRADEMARK LAW
- 1. Europe
- 2. The United States
- E. USE OF EULAS OR TPMS TO PREVENT REPAIR WHEN A PRODUCT IS PROTECTED BY SEVERAL IPRS AT THE SAME TIME
- IV. IS IT LAWFUL TO BLOCK RECYCLE THROUGH EULAs and TPMs?
- A. EUROPE
- B. THE UNITED STATES
- 1. Patent and Design Law
- 2. Trademark and Copyright Law
- V. SHOULD LIMITATIONS TO REPAIR AND RECYCLE BE ALLOWED?
- A. BLOCKING REPAIR
- B. BLOCKING RECYCLE
- C. ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS
- 1. Europe
- 2. The United States
- VI. CONCLUSION
- Part 2 Issues under Patent Law
- Chapter 3 Repair and Recycle as Direct Patent Infringement?
- I. INTRODUCTION: PATENT EXHAUSTION ON REPAIR AND RECYCLING
- II. REPAIR AND RECYCLING IN DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS: THE US, JAPAN, THE UK AND GERMANY
- A. THE US
- 1. The Origins of Patent Exhaustion in the US Supreme Court
- 2. Replacement of Unpatented Parts of Combination Products
- 3. Multiple Factors and Extrinsic Conditions
- 4. Not 'Repair', but 'Akin to Repair'
- 5. Overview: Permissible Repair in the US
- B. JAPAN
- 1. Japanese Cases and Patent Exhaustion
- 2. Canon as Decided by the Supreme Court
- 3. Canon before the IP High Court
- 4. Other Early Cases
- 5. Overview: Permissible Repair in Japan
- C. GERMANY
- 1. 'Intended Use' and the Exhaustion Doctrine
- 2. No Protection in Case of Replacement of Consumable Spare Parts
- 3. Alteration of the 'Identity' of Products: The Flügelradzähler Case
- 4. Overview: Permissible Repair in Germany
- D. THE UK: DENIAL OF IMPLIED LICENSE THEORY IN THE UNITED WIRE CASE
- III. INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON: SINGLE-USE CAMERA CASE AS THE TOUCHSTONE
- IV. A POSSIBLE SOLUTION: SINGLE-USE RESTRICTIONS?
- V. SYNTHESIS AND THOUGHTS ON THE ROAD AHEAD
- Chapter 4 Repair and Refill as Indirect Patent Infringement
- I. INTRODUCTION
- A. DIRECT AND INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT
- B. SENSEO'S COFFEE MACHINE AS AN EXAMPLE
- II. THE CONCEPT OF 'INDIRECT' OR 'CONTRIBUTORY' INFRINGEMENT IN DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS
- A. EUROPE: GERMANY, THE NETHERLANDS AND THE UK
- 1. The CPC
- 2. The Netherlands
- 3. Germany
- 4. The UK
- B. ASIA: JAPAN AND KOREA
- 1. Japan
- 2. Korea
- C. THE US
- 1. Inducement
- 2. Contributory Infringement
- III. ANALYSIS
- A. ESSENTIAL ELEMENT VERSUS STATE OF THE ART
- B. STATE OF THE ART AND STAPLE PRODUCTS
- C. OBJECTIVE LIMITS (EXHAUSTION) AND IMPLIED PERMISSION
- D. SEPARATION OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT
- E. CONCLUSION
- Part 3 Issues under Copyright Law
- Chapter 5 Blocking Repair or Fair Use of Software? The U.S. Perspectives on Anticircumvention
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. THE LEGISLATIVE STRUCTURE
- A. TYPES OF PROHIBITIONS
- B. LIABILITIES
- C. EXEMPTIONS
- III. THE JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS
- A. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC. V. CORLEY
- B. THE CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. V. SKYLINK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- C. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC.
- D. STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP. (A/K/A STORAGETEK) V. CUSTOM HARDWARE ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, INC.
- IV. ANALYSES AND COMMENTS
- V. CONCLUSION: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
- Part 4 Issues under Trade Mark and Design Law
- Chapter 6 Trademarks and Reconditioned Goods in Greater China and at Common Law
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. HONG KONG
- A. TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (CAP 43) LHK
- 1. Refilling, Repackaging, and Repair
- 2. Establishing Infringement under Section 18 of the Trade Mark Ordinance
- 3. Section 19(3): Honest Practices in Industrial and Commercial Practices
- 4. Infringement by Use
- 5. Comparative Advertising
- 6. Exceptions to Infringement
- B. OWNERSHIP OF THE BADGE OF RECOGNITION: MANUFACTURER, DEALER, OR DISTRIBUTOR
- III. MAINLAND CHINA
- A. TRADEMARK LAW AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS
- 1. Infringement of Registered Trademarks
- 2. Administrative Actions
- 3. Criminal Liability for Trademark Counterfeiting
- B. UNFAIR COMPETITION ACT
- Chapter 7 Repairs, Interconnections, and Consumer Welfare in the Field of Design
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. LACK OF TREATY CONSTRAINTS AND VARIETY OF DESIGN LAWS
- A. PARIS, BERNE, TRIPS
- B. DEFENCES
- C. HAGUE
- D. LOCARNO
- E. SCOPE FOR EXPERIMENT
- III. CUMULATION
- IV. THE SPARE PART NON-PROBLEM
- V. IN, OUT, OR HALFWAY HOUSE: DESIGN LAW STRATEGIES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE PROTECTION OR NON-PROTECTION OF SPARE PARTS
- A. REQUIRE ORNAMENTAL ASPECT AS A PRE-REQUISITE FOR PROTECTION AND SET HIGH THRESHOLD
- B. EXCLUDE FUNCTIONAL DESIGN FROM PROTECTION
- C. ALLOW FUNCTIONAL DESIGN TO BE PROTECTED, AT LEAST WHERE THERE IS DESIGN FREEDOM, BUT STILL FOCUS ON THE PRODUCT'S APPEARANCE
- D. PROTECT ONLY WHOLE ARTICLES (CARS, VACUUM CLEANERS)
- E. EXCLUDE CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL SECTORS FROM DESIGN PROTECTION
- F. PROTECT DESIGNS ONLY FOR SPECIFIC ARTICLES AND EXCLUDE SPARE PARTS FROM THE LIST OF ARTICLES THAT MAY BE PROTECTED
- G. REDUCE THE DURATION OF PROTECTION FOR SPARE PARTS
- H. SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDE SPARE PARTS FROM PROTECTION BY REFERENCE TO THEIR DESIDERATA: FITTING, MATCHING, PERMITTING RE-ASSEMBLY
- I. CREATE DEFENCES FOR SPARES AND REPAIRS
- J. COMPULSORY LICENSING/LICENSES OF RIGHT
- K. LIMIT THE REMEDIES AVAILABLE FOR INFRINGEMENT
- L. MAKE AVAILABLE A 'THREATS' ACTION TO DETER OVERWEENING USE OF RIGHTS
- M. 'INTERNAL' OR 'EXTERNAL' LIMITS TO DESIGN LAW PROTECTION?
- N. 'NON-DEROGATION FROM GRANT'
- O. SUBJECT THE EXERCISE OF DESIGN RIGHTS TO THE DOCTRINE OF ABUS DE DROIT, OR 'PATENT MISUSE', WHERE THIS IS AVAILABLE
- P. LEAVE SPARE PARTS PROTECTED, WITH COMPETITION LAWS PROVIDING A BACKSTOP AGAINST ABUSE
- Q. THE CONTEXT OF OTHER RELEVANT LAWS
- VI. REVIEW IN EUROPE: WHAT HAVE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT PROPOSED?
- Part 5 Issues under Competition Law
- Chapter 8 Antitrust Considerations: Refusal to License Intellectual Property in the U.S. and EC
- I. INTRODUCTION
- II. U.S. LAW
- III. EC LAW
- A. COMMERCIAL SOLVENTS
- B. VOLVO
- C. MAGILL
- D. OSCAR BRONNER
- E. MICROSOFT
- 1. Dominant Position
- 2. Extending Dominant Position to Server Market
- 3. Microsoft's Alleged Justification
- 4. Remedy
- a. To Supply Whom
- b. FRAND Prices
- F. IMS
- 1. Conditions in Magill Cumulative: Novelty
- 2. Conditions in Magill Exhaustive
- 3. Access Must Be Essential To Prevent All Competition Being Eliminated
- 4. Secondary Market May Be Potential or Hypothetical
- 5. No Justification
- 6. Level of Compensation
- 7. Conclusion on IMS
- G. SYFAIT
- H. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS
- 1. The Judgment of the Full Court of the CFI in Microsoft
- 2. Syfait II v. GSK Aeve
- 3. The Commission Guidance on Enforcement Priorities
- I. INDUSTRY STANDARDS
- J. CONCLUSION
- Subject Index
- Case Index
- Back Cover
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.