
Interculturality, Rationality and Dialogue
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions


Person
Content
- Cover
- Titel
- Impressum
- Widmung
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Note on the Quotation of Sources in Spanish
- List of Diagrams
- Introduction
- PART I: DIVERSITY AND THE CHALLENGES TO DIALOGUE
- 1. The Argumentative Dimension of Intercultural Dialogue
- 1.1. Introduction
- 1.2. The Context for Dialogue
- 1.2.1. Between Inculturation and Dialogue: The Challenges of the Latin American Catholic Church
- 1.2.1.1. The Commitment of the Church with Indigenous Peoples
- 1.2.1.2. The Gospel and the Cultures
- 1.2.2. The Struggles for Recognition of Indigenous Peoples and the Emergence of Multicultural Models
- 1.2.2.1. Indigenous Reconstructed Claims and Regained Rights
- 1.2.2.2. Democratic Participation as Intercultural Deliberation
- 1.2.2.3. Legal Pluralism and The Resolution of Intercultural Conflicts
- 1.3. The Borders of Dialogue
- 1.3.1. The Normative Base of Intercultural Dialogue
- 1.3.2. Grice's Conversational Maxims Interculturally Examined
- 1.4. Difficulties for Establishing Intercultural Normative Criteria for Dialogue
- 1.4.1. The Objection of Incommensurability as Radical Relativism
- 1.4.2. The Objection of Normativity as Neo-Colonialism
- 1.4.2.1. Interculturality as a Critique to Illegitimate Universalization
- 1.4.2.2. Between Dialectical and Dialogical Dialogue
- 1.5. Conclusion: A first Insight into the Function and Shape of the Intercultural Normative Criteria for Dialogue
- 2. Heterogenic Rationalities
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Rationalities as Culturally Relative Types of Logic
- 2.2.1. Problems with the Hypothesis of Logical Relativism
- 2.3. Rationalities as Incompatible Worldviews
- 2.3.1. The Case of Andean Rationality
- 2.3.2. Criticisms of the Idea of Different 'Conceptual Schemes'
- 2.4. Rationalities as Alternative Reasoning Patterns
- 2.4.1. Rival Explanatory Patterns
- 2.4.1.1. Mythical Causality
- 2.4.1.2. Non Causal Explanatory Principles
- 2.4.2. Competing Patterns of Justification: the Word of Origin as Primary Ground
- 2.5. Conclusion
- 3. Towards an Intercultural Reasonableness
- 3.1. Introduction
- 3.2. From an Intercultural Theory of Rationality to a Notion of Intercultural Reasonableness
- 3.3. Assessing Reasonableness Interculturally: The Pragma-Dialectical Model
- 3.3.1. Does the Pragma-Dialectical Approach offer an Interculturally Valid Model of Reasonableness?
- 3.3.1.1. The Pragma-dialectical Reasonableness is Mono-cultural
- 3.3.1.2. The Pragma-dialectical Reasonableness does not avoid Relativism
- 3.3.1.3. A Critical Discussion does not fit the needs of Intercultural Dialogue
- 3.4. Rethinking Reasonableness Interculturally
- 3.4.1. Rationality and Reasonableness
- 3.4.2. Intercultural Reasonableness as Multi-logical Recognition and Interaction
- 3.4.3. Some Interculturally Unreasonable Moves in Dialogue
- 3.4.3.1. Appeal to radical difference
- 3.4.3.2. Illegitimate Universalization
- 3.4.3.3. Fictitious consensus
- 3.4.3.4. Argumentative violence
- 3.5. Conclusion
- PART II: BUILDING INTERCULTURAL CHAKANAS
- 4. The Interconnection of Traditions I: An Interpretation of Intercultural Disagreements
- 4.1. Introduction
- 4.2. What is a Claim?
- 4.2.1. Claims as Complex Speech Acts
- 4.3. Types of Claims
- 4.3.1. Types of Conflicting Claims in Latin American Intercultural Dialogues
- 4.3.2. Habermas' Argumentation Theory Interculturally Revisited
- 4.4. Types of Disagreements
- 4.5. Presuppositions of Disagreement
- 5. The Interconnection of Traditions II: Discursive Interpellation
- 5.1. Introduction
- 5.2. Challenge
- 5.3. Demand
- 5.4. Offering
- 5.5. 'Oppression' and 'Shared Problems' as Factors of Interdependence
- Conclusion: Pluralistic Argumentation
- 1. The Justification of Argumentative Intercultural Criteria
- 2. The Process of Intercultural Dialogue in Latin America
- 3. The Outcome of Dialogue
- 4. The Limits of the Argumentative Dimension of Intercultural Dialogue
- Appendix: List of Intercultural Argumentative Criteria
- Bibliography
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy protection: Watermark-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Use the free software Adobe Reader, Adobe Digital Editions, or any other PDF viewer of your choice (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/Smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or another reading app for eBooks, e.g., PocketBook (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Watermark-DRM, a „soft” copy protection. This means that there are no technical restrictions to prevent illegal distribution. However, there is a personalised watermark embedded in the eBook that can be used to identify the purchaser of the eBook in the event of misuse and to provide evidence for legal purposes.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.