
Erodiano e Commodo
Traduzione e commento storico al primo libro della Storia dell'Impero dopo Marco
Alessandro Galimberti(Author)
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Publisher)
1st Edition
Published on 11. December 2013
187 pages
978-3-647-25303-9 (ISBN)
System requirements
for PDF without DRM
E-Book Single Licence
You are acquiring a single user licence for this eBook, which you might not transfer. [L]
Available for download
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
Alessandro Galimberti legt mit diesem Buch den ersten historischen Kommentar zum ersten Buch Herodians »Die Geschichte des Imperiums nach Marcus« vor. Seine Analysen zeigen, dass Herodian zu einer weitaus differenzierteren und weniger negativen Beurteilung über die Herrschaft von Kaiser Commodus als die meisten anderen zeitgenössischen Quellen kommt, die vor allem die Sicht des Senats widerspiegeln. So charakterisiert er dessen Herrschaft als verpasste Gelegenheit. Commodus vergeudete sein Talent und seine adlige Abstammung, was letztendlich zu seinem Niedergang führte. Dem italienischen Kommentar voraus geht eine historische Einführung und eine italienische Übersetzung des ersten Buchs Herodians.
It's the first historical commentary on the first book of Herodian's "History of the Empire after Marcus" on Commodus' principate. The commentary is accompanied by an extensive historiographical introduction and by the italian translation. The analysis of the first book shows that Herodian was an eyewitness of Commodus' reign and integrates this testimony, made of personal memories, with oral and written sources. There is no reason to exclude that Herodian had read the work of Cassius Dio - who was also an eyewitness of Commodus' time - indeed, it is very likely that Dio was among the sources of Herodian, although it is wrong to think that Herodian depends exclusively from Dio and consequently to understimate the testimony of Herodian in favor of that of Dion. Herodian, who writes for a greek audience is for us a very valuable source for Commodus' reign for at least two reasons: first, because it preserves a point of view different from the senatorial one that is in Dion and in the Commodus life in the Historia Augusta, as well as in other minor sources, radically hostile to Commodus, among which Galen's De indolentia, whose testimony (the oldest in the reign of Commodus) is here valued for the first time. Herodian's judgment of Commodus is also more complex than the other sources. The final judgment of Commodus is emblematic of the point of view of Herodian and that is a missed opportunity: Commodus wasted his talent and his nobility. His downfall is ultimately due to the fact of having disregarded the expectations that had been created around him.
It's the first historical commentary on the first book of Herodian's "History of the Empire after Marcus" on Commodus' principate. The commentary is accompanied by an extensive historiographical introduction and by the italian translation. The analysis of the first book shows that Herodian was an eyewitness of Commodus' reign and integrates this testimony, made of personal memories, with oral and written sources. There is no reason to exclude that Herodian had read the work of Cassius Dio - who was also an eyewitness of Commodus' time - indeed, it is very likely that Dio was among the sources of Herodian, although it is wrong to think that Herodian depends exclusively from Dio and consequently to understimate the testimony of Herodian in favor of that of Dion. Herodian, who writes for a greek audience is for us a very valuable source for Commodus' reign for at least two reasons: first, because it preserves a point of view different from the senatorial one that is in Dion and in the Commodus life in the Historia Augusta, as well as in other minor sources, radically hostile to Commodus, among which Galen's De indolentia, whose testimony (the oldest in the reign of Commodus) is here valued for the first time. Herodian's judgment of Commodus is also more complex than the other sources. The final judgment of Commodus is emblematic of the point of view of Herodian and that is a missed opportunity: Commodus wasted his talent and his nobility. His downfall is ultimately due to the fact of having disregarded the expectations that had been created around him.
More details
Series
195
Edition
Aufl.
Language
German
Place of publication
Göttingen
Germany
File size
1,49 MB
ISBN-13
978-3-647-25303-9 (9783647253039)
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions

Alessandro Galimberti
Erodiano e Commodo
Traduzione e commento storico al primo libro della Storia dell'Impero dopo Marco
Book
12/2013
1st Edition
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
€95.00
Shipment within 5-7 days
Persons
Author
Dr. Alessandro Galimberti lehrt Römische Geschichte am Historischen Seminar der Katholischen Universität Mailand.
Cover design or artwork
Content
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Table of Contents
- Body
- Introduzione
- Traduzione e commento storico
- Indice dei nomi
- Back Cover
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy protection: without DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Use the free software Adobe Reader, Adobe Digital Editions, or any other PDF viewer of your choice (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/Smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or another reading app for eBooks, e.g., PocketBook (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook does not use copy protection or Digital Rights Management.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.