Compromise and the American Founding
The Quest for the People's Two Bodies
Published on 28. August 2019
268 pages
978-1-108-24672-9 (ISBN)
Description
Why is today's political life so polarized? This book analyzes the ways in which the divergent apprehensions of both 'compromise' and the 'people' in seventeenth-century England and France became intertwined once again during the American founding, sometimes with bloody results. Looking at key-moments of the founding, from the first Puritan colonies to the beginning of the Civil War, this book offers answers of contemporary relevance. It argues that Americans unknowingly combined two understandings of the people: the early modern idea of a collection of individuals ruled by a majority of wills and the classic understanding of a corporation hierarchically structured and ruled by reason for the common good. Americans were then able to implement the paradigm of the 'people's two bodies'. Whenever the dialectic between the two has been broken, the results had have a major impact on American politics. Born by accident, this American peculiarity has proven to be a long-lasting one.
Reviews / Votes
'The American political tradition has always been driven by principle, and yet somehow open to compromise. In this unprecedented work, Alin Fumurescu investigates how colonists and early Americans - largely through competing and evolving conceptualizations of 'the people' - re-imagined the nature of compromise, its potentials and perils. In light of our current, increasingly polarized and uncompromising politics, the nuanced analysis here is as timely as it is valuable.' Robert Martin, Hamilton College 'Meticulously researched, this work expands literature connecting Puritanical influences and the American founding to modern politics.' K. Casey, ChoiceMore details
Language
English
Place of publication
Cambridge
United Kingdom
Target group
Professional and scholarly
College/higher education
Illustrations
Worked examples or Exercises
File size
3,16 MB
ISBN-13
978-1-108-24672-9 (9781108246729)
Copyright in bibliographic data and cover images is held by Nielsen Book Services Limited or by the publishers or by their respective licensors: all rights reserved.
Schweitzer Classification
Other editions
Additional editions
Book
07/2021
Cambridge University Press
€46.20
Shipment within 15-20 days
Book
09/2019
Cambridge University Press
€129.10
Shipment within 15-20 days
Person
Content
1. Introduction: 'one political being called a people ...'; 1.1. One people, two bodies; 1.2. Compromise and the challenge of realism; 1.3. E Pluribus Unum; the people's two bodies - then and now; 2. The uncompromising Puritans: 'If the whole conclave of hell can so compromise ...'; 2.1. '... Puritanism was in the eye of the beholder'; 2.2. '... As the entrails of a creature cut down the back'; 2.3. '... They look backward as well as forward'; 2.4. '... They don't weigh the intellectual furniture ...'; 2.5. '... Until a better light will be available to guide them'; 3. The uncompromising patriots: 'friends, brethren, enemies will prove ...'; 3.1. '... We are breaking to pieces in our churches'; 3.2. In the wake of the awakening; 3.3. 'How then do we new Englandermen derive our laws?'; 3.4. The king 'unkings himself'; 4. The compromising confederates: '... mounting a body of mermaids on alligators'; 4.1. '... A rope of sand'; 4.2. 'We are the state'; 4.3. '... Mutual sacrifices should be made to effect a compromise ...'; 5. The constitution: '... that greatest of all compromises'; 5.1. 'The states must see the rod ...'; 5.2. '... To smoke the calumet of union and love'; 5.3. 'The house on fire must be extinguished ...'; 5.4. 'It will wait upon the ladies at their toilett ...'; 6. 'This is essentially a people's contest': 'Shall we compromise?'; 6.1. '... Fresh from the loins of the people ...'; 6.2. 'Party spirit ... only ask to lick the sores of the body politic'; 6.3. 'The day of compromise has passed'; 7. Conclusions: resuscitating the people's two bodies; 7.1. Parties without partisanship?; 7.2. Purged Individualism and Facebook; 7.3. "We, the people ...'.
