The Unitary Presidency

Reviews / Votes

"Dodds provides an essential discussion for understanding today's battles - and tomorrow's headlines - over the scope of presidential power, concisely mapping the contours of unitary executive theory and practice across American history. The unitary executive is 'neither a fiction nor a fact,' he argues, but a political instrument. Enforcing the Constitution's constraints on unilateralism will thus come not from toying with textual definitions but from political will." Andrew Rudalevige, Bowdoin College, USA

"Dodds's book represents the best comprehensive study to date on the unitary executive theory in American politics. This work is not only relevant for scholars seeking to understand the exercise of presidential power during the recent George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump administrations, but it assesses the unitary executive in relation to the evolving American presidency since George Washington. More importantly, it helps to clear the muddy waters in presidential research by demonstrating how the theory of the unitary executive is distinct from scholarly notions of the administrative and unilateral presidencies." Adam L. Warber, Clemson University, USA

"What a very fine book this is! To come to grips with the unitary presidency is no easy task. Professor Dodds marshals historic examples, weighs normative claims, and evaluates empirical evidence in his treatment of this important topic. He skillfully demonstrates that supporters as well as opponents of the unitary presidency have reason to be simultaneously cheered and unsettled. I would use this text in an upper-level undergraduate political science course, but Professor Dodds's cogent writing makes this text accessible to an even broader audience." Barry L. Tadlock, Ohio University, USA

"In The Unitary Presidency, Graham Dodds has provided scholars with a concise summary of one of the more interesting normative issues in the study of the American presidency: the unitary executive theory. . . . Dodds outlines arguments both for and against the viability of the unitary executive theory from two perspectives: a normative perspective and an empirical one. Here the author's concise writing and presentation style shine, as he succinctly outlines arguments that have been made from constitutional, historical, and practical vantage points either to bolster or to detract from the theory. . . . There remain fundamental limitations to what presidents can practically accomplish, and in spite of the aggrandizement of presidential power that has occurred over the last century, Dodds has reminded us that it is an office that is in no sense truly unitary."

--Joshua B. Kennedy, Georgia Southern University, in Congress & the Presidency