Exploring (Im)mobilities

Reviews / Votes

This is an extremely timely book that reminds us of some of the neglected aspects of the new mobility paradigm in sociolinguistic research. It covers research contexts that have not been previously explored. Its conceptual and methodological innovations ensure the book's lasting impact on theory, research design, policy and practice. * Li Wei, University College London, UK * This book treats the notion of (im)mobilization in a competent and nuanced manner. It considers at least four competing but complementary perspectives: (1) language resources and repertoires, (2) language practices and technologies, (3) control, mobility and resistance, and (4) subjectivity, identity and agency, drawing from examples in different regions of the globe. This is a welcome and timely addition to the expanding scholarship on the topic. * Sinfree Makoni, Pennsylvania State University, USA and Laikipia University, Kenya * Among the large animals, humans stand out for their propensity to migrate, their social stratification, and their complex symbolic communication. The authors of this volume explore the intersection of mobilities, inequalities, and discourses in a powerful set of contemporary case studies from around the world. * Ingrid Piller, Macquarie University, Australia * Exploring (Im)mobilities is certainly an interesting read for those who want to know more about the role of language in contexts of (im)mobilization and processes of (im)mobility. It is written in a style that is accessible to undergraduate and more senior scholars as well as to the informed reader with an interest in language-on-the-move. -- Noel B. Salazar, KU Leuven, Belgium * Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2022 * Speaking from my own collaboration (Holsapple 2022) with Multilingual Matters, I can affirm that Exploring (Im)mobilities: Language Practices, Discourses and Imaginaries is no exception to their commitment to publishing critically-engaged scholarship that hinges on challenging and shaking up, rather than assuming and reifying normative patterns of analysis. Addressing the widespread fallacy of considering mobility primarily through a positivist lens, the volume's eleven sociolinguistic case studies bring to the forefront agentive meaning-making practices through which (im)mobility is reconfigured, as experienced by asylum-seekers, migrants, and other minoritized mobile groups. * Christiana Decheva, University of Tartu, Estonia, Tertium Linguistic Journal 8 (1) (2023) *