Eyewitnessing

Reviews / Votes

Provides us with a compendium . . . which continues the long process of restoring the balance between written documentation and optical representation as carriers of historical information . . . a thoroughly engrossing explication of how fine art, graphics, photographs, film and other media can be used to make sense of lives lived out in other times * <i>Tate Magazine</i> * Well-informed and fair-minded, and it prompts one to ponder * Michael Baxandall, <i>English Historical Review</i> * Eyewitnessing is not about the value of images at all, but rather about the primacy of words . . . The book becomes a sustained argument for the preservation of old-fashioned text-based history, through the constant citing of contexts in which images are nothing without textual support. * Nicholas Hiley, <i>Times Literary Supplement</i> * Burke . . . describes and evaluates the methods by which art historians have traditionally analyzed images, finding them insufficient to address the complexities of visual imagery. * <i>Book News</i> * Burke . . . has produced a fine book resulting from his study of images as sources of historical evidence. . . .The author . . . is known for his interest in finding links between languages, cultures, and epochs as well as methodologies and disciplines. The present volume is an example of this sweeping intelligence at work and is a must for students of history, culture, fine arts, anthropology, and film. * <i>Choice</i> * This book is especially valuable for its many examples of images that could be used in historical research, and for its coherent summary of key concepts and theories . . . Eyewitnessing is highly recommended for historians and art historians alike. * Nina K. Stephenson, University of New Mexico, <i>Art Documentation</i> * Any timid historian reading this book would run in terror from even thinking about using images as evidence. Burke details the pitfalls as he surveys types of images historians might use . . . Overall, an encouraging short introduction to a tricky subject. * <i>Virginia Quarterly Review</i> * As Peter Burke illustrates in Eyewitnessing, images have a long tradition of distorting the facts. Of what use, then, are images to scholars of history? What types of historical evidence do images provide? Burke sets out to answer these questions. His book is intended to encourage and instruct readers in the historiographic use of images, and it succeeds splendidly on both counts . . . Through an impressive array of case studies, Burke demonstrates the value of images to historians while providing instructive warnings about their use . . . For those new to the study of images, Eyewitnessing provides an accessible and practical introduction to the historiographic use of visual culture. For art historians and scholars already committed to the study of visual phenomena, Burkes book serves as a cogent reminder of the complex relations between images and history * Sharon Corwin, University of California, Berkeley, <i>Technology and Culture </i> *