
Leading Practices and Key Performance Indicators for Asset Maintenance
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
The research gathered information from the utilities on the Maintenance Program and the KPIs used to support the program through personal interviews, reports, data sheets, survey results etc. This information was used to create 5 case studies, each covering 2 maintenance practices and 1 utility. Each case study contains brief information about the utility, process of implementing maintenance practices, current program, KPIs to support the practice, value and lessons learnt for other utilities. The research indicated that the utilities were able to implement the maintenance practice successfully with external and/or internal help. The research also found that the implementation and integration of new maintenance practices were far reaching, having impacts to organization structure, the technology in use and asset maintenance.
More details
Content
- Cover
- Copyright
- Acknowledgments
- Abstract and Benefits
- Table of Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- List of Acronyms
- Executive Summary
- Chapter 1.0 Introduction
- 1.1 Background
- 1.2 Overview of the SAM Challenge
- 1.3 Overview of WERF SAM Project: Phase 3
- 1.4 Goal and Objectives of WERF SAM Project: Phase 4
- 1.5 Goal and Objectives of WERF SAM Project: Phase 5
- Chapter 2.0 Project Approach
- 2.1 Project Approach Steps
- 2.2 Analysis of Survey Findings
- 2.3 Case Studies of Leading Practices
- 2.4 Recommendations for Utilities
- Chapter 3.0 Analysis of Survey Findings
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Practice Assessment Statement Results
- 3.3 Key Performance Indicator Statement Results
- 3.4 Conclusions
- Chapter 4.0 Case Studies of Leading Practices
- Chapter 5.0 Toronto Water
- 5.1 Toronto Water Competencies
- 5.2 Toronto Water Utility Overview
- 5.2.1 Capabilities
- 5.2.2 Toronto Water's Service Area
- 5.2.3 Contributing Agencies and Treatment Plants
- 5.3 Maintenance Tactic Selection Overview
- 5.3.1 Toronto Water's Maintenance Tactic Selection Program Review
- 5.3.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain a Maintenance Tactic Selection Program
- 5.3.3 Developing and Sustaining Maintenance Tactic Selection Program
- 5.3.4 Current Program
- 5.4 KPI Supporting Maintenance Tactic Selection Program
- 5.5 The Value of the Maintenance Tactic Selection Program
- 5.6 Lessons Learned
- 5.7 Conclusions
- Chapter 6.0 JEA
- 6.1 JEA Competencies
- 6.2 JEA Utility Overview
- 6.2.1 JEA's Background
- 6.2.2 JEA's Capabilities
- 6.2.3 JEA Service Area
- 6.2.4 Contributing Agencies and Treatment Plants
- 6.3 CMMS Access and Use Overview
- 6.3.1 JEA's CMMS Access and Use Review
- 6.3.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain CMMS Access and Use
- 6.3.3 Developing and Sustaining CMMS Access and Use Strategy
- 6.3.4 Current Program
- 6.4 KPIs Supporting the Maintenance Program
- 6.5 The Value of a CMMS Access and Use
- 6.6 Lessons Learned
- 6.7 Conclusions
- Chapter 7.0 Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
- 7.1 Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (SRCSD) Competencies
- 7.2 (SRCSD) Utility Overview
- 7.2.1 SRCSD History
- 7.2.2 SRCSD Capabilities
- 7.2.3 SRCSD's Service Area
- 7.2.4 Contributing Agencies
- 7.3 Planning and Scheduling Overview
- 7.3.1 SRCSD's Planning and Scheduling Review
- 7.3.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain Planning and Scheduling
- 7.3.3 Developing and Sustaining Planning and Scheduling
- 7.3.4 Current Program
- 7.4 KPIs Supporting Planning and Scheduling Program
- 7.5 The Value of Planning and Scheduling
- 7.5.1 Benefits to SRCSD by Their Planning Program
- 7.5.2 Benefits to SRCSD by Their Scheduling Program
- 7.5.3 Benefits of Work Management Process for Maintenance Workers
- 7.5.4 Benefits of Work Management Process for the Organization
- 7.6 Lessons Learned
- 7.7 Conclusions
- Chapter 8.0 Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
- 8.1 Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Competencies
- 8.2 SDLAC Utility Overview
- 8.2.1 SDLAC History
- 8.2.2 SDLAC Capabilities
- 8.2.3 SDLAC's Service Area
- 8.2.4 Contributing Agencies and Treatment Plants
- 8.3 Condition-Based Maintenance Strategy Overview
- 8.3.1 SDLAC's Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) Condition-Based Maintenance Program Review
- 8.3.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain a Condition-Based Maintenance Program
- 8.3.3 Developing and Sustaining Condition-Based Maintenance Program
- 8.3.4 Current Program
- 8.3.5 Current Organization Needs to Sustain Condition-Based Maintenance
- 8.3.6 Ongoing Investment to Sustain the Condition-Based Maintenance Program
- 8.4 KPIs Supporting Condition-Based Maintenance
- 8.5 The Value of a Condition-Based Maintenance Program
- 8.6 Lessons Learned
- 8.7 Conclusions
- 8.8 Reliability Analysis Overview
- 8.8.1 SDLAC's Reliability Analysis Review
- 8.8.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain a Reliability Analysis Program
- 8.8.3 Developing and Sustaining the Reliability Analysis Program
- 8.8.4 Current Program
- 8.8.5 Current Organization Needs to Sustain the Reliability Analysis Program
- 8.8.6 Ongoing Investment to Sustain the Reliability Analysis Program
- 8.9 KPIs Supporting Reliability Analysis
- 8.10 The Value of Reliability Analysis
- 8.11 Lessons Learned
- 8.12 Conclusions
- Chapter 9.0 Seattle Public Utilities
- 9.1 Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) Competencies
- 9.2 SPU Overview
- 9.2.1 SPU History
- 9.2.2 SPU Capabilities
- 9.2.3 SPU's Service Area
- 9.2.4 Contributing Agencies and Treatment Plants
- 9.3 Asset Management Overview
- 9.3.1 Seattle's AM Program Review
- 9.3.2 Drivers to Develop and Maintain an AM Program
- 9.3.3 Developing and Sustaining an AM Program
- 9.3.4 Initial Investments and Organizational Changes
- 9.3.5 Current Program
- 9.4 KPI Supporting AM Program
- 9.5 The Value of an AM Program
- 9.6 Lessons Learned
- 9.7 Conclusions
- Chapter 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
- 10.1 Conclusions
- 10.2 Recommendations
- 10.2.1 Recommendations for Utilities That Plan to Implement and/or Integrate a New Maintenance Strategy in Their Utility
- 10.2.2 Recommendations for Future Research
- Appendix A: Survey Practice Statements
- Appendix B: Survey Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- Appendix C: Sample Utilities Report
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.