
WEF/WERF Study Quantifying Nutrient Removal Technology Performance
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
To this end, managers of 22 plants, 10 achieving low effluent TP, 9 achieving low effluent TN, and 3 achieving low effluent ammonia, were asked to provide 3 years of operational data that were analyzed using a consistent statistical approach. Technical papers were compiled for each plant including a summary of influent loading, process design and operating conditions, unusual events, upsets and anecdotes related to process operation, and the statistical summary of final effluent data that considered both process reliability and the permit limits applied. The first year of this effort culminated in a workshop held in Chicago at WEFTEC 2008 and the second year in a workshop held in Orlando at WEFTEC 2009.
Technological conclusions that can be drawn from the study in terms of what can be learned by comparing the different nutrient removal processes employed at these 22 plants and several additional BNR facilities in Florida are described in joint manuscripts submitted by Parker et al (2009) and Bott et al (2009). In a parallel effort using the data and conclusions generated from this study, Neethling et al (2009) proposed a set of quantitative descriptors that attempt to define the nutrient removal performance in terms of effluent quality percentile statistics referred to as Technology Performance Statistics (TPSs). The TPSs were defined as three separate values representing the lowest, median, and reliably achievable performance (Neethling et al, 2009).
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Cover
- Copyright
- Acknowledgments
- Abstract and Benefits
- Table of Contents
- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- List of Acronyms
- Executive Summary
- Chapter 1.0: Project Background and Objectives
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Project Background
- 1.2.1 Plant Data
- 1.2.2 Reliability
- 1.2.3 Limit of Technology
- 1.3 Objectives
- 1.4 Organization
- Chapter 2.0: Project Approach
- 2.1 Statistical Analysis
- 2.1.1 Probability Calculations
- 2.1.2 Reliability Calculations
- 2.2 Technology Performance Statistics
- 2.2.1 Lowest Technology Performance Statistic
- 2.2.2 Median Technology Performance Statistic
- 2.2.3 Reliable Technology Performance Statistic
- 2.2.4 Technology Variability from TPS-14d Performance
- 2.3 Technology Evaluation
- Chapter 3.0: Plants Surveyed
- 3.1 Data Provided
- 3.2 Process Building Blocks
- 3.3 Summary of Plants
- 3.4 Nitrogen Removal Plants
- 3.4.1 Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility, NV
- 3.4.2 River Oaks, FL
- 3.4.3 Western Branch, WSSC, MD
- 3.4.4 Scituate, MA
- 3.4.5 Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation Agency, CA
- 3.4.6 Eastern Water Reclamation Facility, FL
- 3.4.7 Parkway, WSSC, MD
- 3.4.8 Piscataway, WSSC, MD
- 3.4.9 Fiesta Village, FL
- 3.5 Phosphorus Removal Plants
- 3.5.1 Clark County, NV
- 3.5.2 Iowa Hill Water Reclamation Facility, CO
- 3.5.3 F. Wayne Hill, GA
- 3.5.4 Cauley Creek, GA
- 3.5.5 Pinery, CO
- 3.5.6 Alexandria Sanitation Authority, VA
- 3.5.7 Rock Creek, OR
- 3.5.8 Blue Plains, DC
- 3.5.9 Kelowna, BC
- 3.5.10 Kalispell, MT
- 3.6 Nitrification Reliability Plants
- 3.6.1 Kalkaska, MI
- 3.6.2 Littleton/Englewood, CO
- 3.6.3 Utoy Creek, GA
- 3.7 Summary of Plant Processes
- 3.8 Summary of Influent Flows and Loads
- 3.9 Summary of Chemical Dosages
- Chapter 4.0: Nitrogen Removal Plants
- 4.1 Reliability
- 4.2 Technology Performance Statistics
- 4.3 Technology Evaluation
- 4.4 Detailed Analysis of Nitrogen Removal Plant Performance
- 4.4.1 River Oaks, FL
- 4.4.2 Western Branch, WSSC, MD
- 4.4.3 Scituate, MA
- 4.4.4 Tahoe-Truckee Sanitation Agency, CA
- 4.4.5 Eastern Water Reclamation Facility, FL
- 4.4.6 Parkway, WSSC, MD
- 4.4.7 Piscataway, WSSC, MD
- 4.4.8 Fiesta Village, FL
- Chapter 5.0: Phosphorus Removal Plants
- 5.1 Reliability
- 5.2 Technology Performance Statistics
- 5.3 Technology Evaluation
- 5.4 Detailed Analysis of Phosphorus Removal Plant Performance
- 5.4.1 Iowa Hill Water Reclamation Facility, CO
- 5.4.2 F. Wayne Hill, GA
- 5.4.3 Cauley Creek, GA
- 5.4.4 Pinery, CO
- 5.4.5 Alexandria Sanitation Authority, VA
- 5.4.6 Rock Creek, OR
- 5.4.7 Blue Plains, DC
- 5.4.8 Kelowna, BC
- 5.4.9 Kalispell, MT
- Chapter 6.0: Nitrification Reliability
- 6.1 Reliability
- 6.2 Technology Performance Statistics
- 6.3 Technology Evaluation
- 6.4 Detailed Analysis of Nitrification Reliability Plant Performance
- 6.4.1 Littleton/Englewood, CO
- 6.4.2 Utoy Creek, GA
- Chapter 7.0: Discussion
- 7.1 Lessons Learned from the Plant Managers
- 7.1.1 External Influences
- 7.1.2 Operations or Design Influences
- 7.2 Permit Setting Impacts
- Chapter 8.0: Conclusions
- References
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.