
The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union
Description
Alles über E-Books | Antworten auf Fragen rund um E-Books, Kopierschutz und Dateiformate finden Sie in unserem Info- & Hilfebereich.
Twenty-one outstanding European legal scholars expose a spectrum of ways in which the traditional legality principle is under pressure because of the creation of new legal orders, including that of the EU, and the interaction between these new orders and that of the State, combined with such factors as expertise driven governance, difficulties of international organizations to meet their objectives due to a lack of adequate powers, and lack of parliamentary control.
The question of whether the main functions of legality - legitimating, attributing and regulating the exercise of public authority - are still fulfilled in the context of the overlapping, interacting, and mutually dependent legal orders of the EU, the ECHR, and the Member States is at the background of all the essays in this volume. Recognizing that legality, if it is to survive, demands rigorous reconsideration of its scope and application, the authors interrogate not only such fundamental democratic issues as who has legitimate power to perform legislative acts and through these to exercise of public power over citizens, but also such urgent European problems as the following:;
the use of the precautionary principle in EU decision-making;
the scope of the principle that the exercise of public authority must rest on an act of Parliament;
the extent to which the EU can provide a legal basis for action of Member State authorities in the absence of such a basis within Member State legal orders;
the constitutional position of independent 'regulators';
the requirements that ECJ and ECHR case law impose on the exercise of public authority;
whether legislative results are coherent in the sensitive area of equal treatment;
transparency, legal certainty, enforceability, and implementation of EC Directives in the field of workers' involvement;
new instruments as the Open Method of Coordination and the involvement of social partners in decision-making;
the de facto harmonization of national criminal justice systems; and
the prominent role of the EU in the field of data protection.
There can be little doubt that the issue of legality and to whom it applies - in a world in which the role of the modern State is changing profoundly - is a crucial one. It is highly important in the context of the ongoing discussion on the meaning of democracy and citizenship. This volume, with its clear message that reconsidering legality demands taking serious issue with the uncertainty engendered by the processes of globalization, will resonate profoundly among practitioners and policymakers in this time of momentous change.
More details
Other editions
Additional editions

Content
- Cover
- Half Title Page
- Editorial Board
- Title Page
- Copyright Page
- List of Contributors
- Summary of Contents
- Table of Contents
- List of Abbreviations
- Preface
- Part I Introduction: Transformation
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Legality in Multiple Legal Orders
- 1. PLURALITY OF LEGAL ORDERS
- 2. LEGALITY IN EUROPE
- 3. A CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE COMMON TO THE MEMBER STATES
- 4. LA LOI EST L'EXPRESSION DE LA VOLONTÉ GÉNÉRALE
- 5. FUNCTIONS OF LEGALITY
- 6. STRUCTURE OF THE BOOK
- Chapter 2 As Good as It Gets: On Risk, Legality and the Precautionary Principle
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. PATIENT ZERO
- 3. SOCIAL DIAGNOSIS: UNCERTAINTY IN A GLOBAL WORLD
- 3.1. THE PROCESSES OF MODERNIZATION: UNCERTAINTY AND SCARCITY
- 3.2. SECOND MODERNITY: UNCERTAINTY AND RISK
- 3.3. THE NATURE OF MODERN RISK
- 3.3.1. Characteristics
- 3.3.2. The Problem of Risk
- 4. THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE
- 4.1. GLOBAL AND EUROPEAN CONTEXT
- 4.2. THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN THE LITERATURE
- 4.3. THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE
- 5. LIBERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW
- 6. BALANCING TWO PRINCIPLES
- 6.1. REGULATING RELATIONS
- 6.2. AN OUTDATED CONCEPT?
- 6.3. LEGALITY UNDER SIEGE
- 6.3.1. 'Internal' Legislation
- 6.3.2. Procedural 'Tinkering'
- 7. CONCLUSION
- Part II Legality and the Attribution of Powers to Public Authorities
- Chapter 3 Administrative Powers in German and in English Law
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. GERMANY
- 2.1. INTRODUCTION
- 2.2. HIERARCHY OF NORMS
- 2.3. THE PRECEDENCE OF STATUTORY LAW
- 2.4. REQUIREMENT OF A STATUTORY BASIS
- 2.4.1. Field of Application: Eingriffsverwaltung and Leistungsverwaltung
- 2.4.2. Parliamentary Reservation
- 2.4.3. Implied Powers
- 2.4.4. Indefinite Legal Terms
- 2.5. USE OF PRIVATE LAW
- 3. THE SOURCES OF GOVERNMENTAL POWER IN ENGLISH LAW
- 3.1. INTRODUCTION
- 3.2. STATUTORY POWER
- 3.3. NON-STATUTORY POWERS: THE ROYAL PREROGATIVES AND THE THIRD SOURCE OF POWER
- 4. CONCLUSION AND OBSERVATIONS
- Chapter 4 National Legality and European Obligations
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. CONTENT AND SCOPE OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE
- 3. THE DIRECTIVE AS DIRECT BASIS FOR POWERS OF THE ADMINISTRATION IN THE NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER
- 3.1. GENERAL
- 3.2. DIRECT EFFECT
- 3.3. CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION
- 4. THE REGULATION AS DIRECT BASIS FOR POWERS OF THE ADMINISTRATION IN THE NATIONAL LEGAL ORDER
- 4.1. THE EUROPEAN VIEW
- 4.2. REGULATIONS IN THE DUTCH LEGAL ORDER
- 5. EVALUATION IN THE LIGHT OF 'COMPOSITE' LEGALITY
- 6. CONCLUSION
- Chapter 5 The Legality of Independent Regulatory Authorities
- 1. INTRODUCTION: THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY
- 2. STRUCTURE
- 3. SETTING THE SCENE: THE REGULATORY BACKGROUND
- 4. INDEPENDENCE
- 4.1. POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE AND INDEPENDENCE FROM MARKET PARTIES
- 4.2. LEGAL BASIS
- 4.3. INDEPENDENCE FROM MARKET PARTIES
- 4.4. NEW REQUIREMENTS: POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE
- 4.5. A GRADUAL REDUCTION OF THE MEMBER STATES' INSTITUTIONAL AUTONOMY
- 5. THE INTERPRETATION OF THE NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES' POWERS
- 5.1. OBSERVATIONS
- BROAD INTERPRETATION OF NRAS' POWERS
- 6. EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND EUROPEAN REGULATORY (NETWORK) AGENCIES
- 7. APPEAL TO THE NATIONAL COURTS
- 7.1. ARTICLE 4 OF THE FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
- 7.2. INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 4 FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
- 7.3. OBSERVATIONS
- 8. CONCLUSIONS
- Part III Legality and Quality of Legislation
- Chapter 6 The Quality of the Law as a Tool for Judicial Control
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
- 2.1. EU LAW
- 2.2. THE APPROACH OF THE ECJ
- 3. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- 3.1. THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
- 3.2. LIMITATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
- 4. THE QUALITY OF THE LAW ACCORDING TO THE ECtHR
- 5. THE 'FORESEEABILITY' UNDER DIFFICULT CIRCUMSTANCES
- 6. IS THE 'QUALITY OF THE LAW' TEST COMPATIBLE WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY?
- 7. CONCLUDING REMARKS
- Chapter 7 Coherent Codification? A Case Study in EU Equal Treatment Legislation
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. RECASTING AS EU POLICY
- 2.1. BETTER LAWMAKING
- 2.2. THE RECASTING TECHNIQUE
- 2.3. ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS?
- 3. RECASTING EU SEX EQUALITY LEGISLATION
- 3.1. THE RECAST DIRECTIVE
- 3.2. SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES?
- 3.3. THE LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBER STATES ARISING OUT OF 'PRINCIPAL INNOVATIONS'
- 4. TRANSPOSITION OF THE RECAST DIRECTIVE INTO NATIONAL LAW
- 4.1. THE OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBER STATES IN THE LIGHT OF ARTICLE 33
- 4.2. MORE CLARITY AND LEGAL CERTAINTY AT EU LEVEL?
- 4.3. TRANSPOSITION AT NATIONAL LEVEL
- 5. CONCLUSIONS
- Chapter 8 The Rocky Path of EU Legislation on Workers' Involvement: Coherent Codification of the Right to Information and Consultation of Workers in European Law?
- 1. INTRODUCTION: THE ISSUE OF LEGALITY IN A MULTIPLICITY OF ORDERS
- 2. THE HISTORY OF WORKERS' INVOLVEMENT RULES IN THE EU
- 3. LEGALITY CRITERIA
- 3.1. LEGITIMATION
- 3.2. QUALITY OF LAW CRITERIA: BETTER REGULATION
- 3.2.1. The Background
- 3.2.2. The Quality Criteria
- 3.2.2.1. Technical Quality
- 4. ANALYSIS OF THE INSTRUMENTS
- 4.1. ASSESSMENT ON LEGITIMATION
- 4.2. ASSESSMENT ON THE QUALITY OF LAW CRITERIA
- 4.2.1. The Requirements of Clarity, Consistency and Coherence
- 4.2.2. Enforceability
- 5. CONCLUSION
- Part IV Legality and the Impact of Non-legislative Instruments
- Chapter 9 The Open Method of Coordination in the Area of Social Policy and the Legality Principle
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. THE OMC FOR EMPLOYMENT POLICIES
- 2.1. THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE OMC IN EMPLOYMENT
- 2.2. THE PROCEDURE FOR THE OMC IN EMPLOYMENT
- 2.3. THE OMC AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SOFT LAW
- 3. THE OPEN METHOD OF COORDINATION IN SOCIAL POLICY AREAS (OMC LIGHT)
- 3.1. INTRODUCTION
- 3.2. THE COMPETENCES OF THE EU IN THE AREA OF SOCIAL POLICY
- 3.3. COMBATING SOCIAL EXCLUSION
- 3.4. THE OMC IN SOCIAL INCLUSION
- 4. EXAMPLES OF THE GUIDELINES AND RECOMMENDATIONS GIVEN AS PART OF THE OMC EMPLOYMENT
- 5. THE FUNCTIONS OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE VIS-À-VIS THE OMC EMPLOYMENT
- 5.1. INTRODUCTION
- 5.2. ATTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY
- 5.3. THE LEGITIMATION FUNCTION
- 5.4. THE REGULATORY FUNCTION
- 6. THE FUNCTION OF THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE VIS-À-VIS THE OMC LIGHT
- 7. CONCLUSIONS: THE OPEN METHOD OF COORDINATION, THE FUNCTIONS OF LEGALITY AND THE MULTIPLE LEGAL ORDER
- Chapter 10 The Principle of Legality and the 'Soft Law' Regulation and Supervision of Financial Markets
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. SOME THEORETICAL QUESTIONS: RATIONALES FOR REGULATION OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, SOFT LAW AND THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE
- 2.1. THE RATIONALES BEHIND REGULATION OF FINANCIAL MARKETS
- 2.2. SOFT LAW
- 2.3. THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE AND FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES
- 3. SOFT LAW INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL MARKETS
- 3.1. GLOBAL
- 3.2. EUROPEAN UNION
- 3.3. THE NETHERLANDS
- 4. FINANCIAL MARKET REGULATION, SOFT LAW INSTRUMENTS AND THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE: A FURTHER ANALYSIS
- 5. CONCLUSION
- Chapter 11 The Quasi-legislative Powers of the European Social Dialogue: Imperfect Delegation of Powers or Ambivalent Recognition of Contractual Autonomy?
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. THE START OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 1.2. LEGALITY OF THE SOCIAL DIALOGUE: KEY ISSUES
- 2. THE POWERS ATRRIBUTED TO THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 2.1. THE ORIGINS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 2.2. COMPETENCES AND PROCEDURES (ARTICLES 154-155 TFEU)
- 2.2.1. Suspension of the Traditional Decision-Making Powers in Social Policy?
- 2.2.2. Substitution of the Traditional Decision-Making Powers in Social Policy?
- 2.3. THE AMBIGUOUS NATURE OF THE EUROPE SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 3. THE (DEMOCRATIC) LEGITIMACY OF THE SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 3.1. NOTIONS OF REPRESENTATIVITY DEVELOPED AT EUROPEAN LEVEL
- 3.2. LEGITIMACY PERCEIVED FORM A PUBLIC LAW MODEL
- 3.3. LEGITIMACY PERCEIVED FROM A PRIVATE (INDUSTRIAL) LAW MODEL
- 4. THE PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL DIALOGUE
- 4.1. QUANTITATIVE RESULTS OF THE ESD
- 4.1.1. Cross-Industry Agreements
- 4.1.2. Sectoral Agreements
- 4.2. QUALITATIVE RESULTS OF THE ESD: ACCESSIBILITY, IMPLEMENTATION AND MODIFICATION
- 4.2.1. Accessibility and Implementation
- 4.2.2. Modifications of Agreements incorporated in Directives
- 5. CONCLUSIONS
- Part V Legality and Concealed Mechanisms behind Extension of EU Powers
- Chapter 12 The Principle of Attributed Powers and the 'Scope of EU Law'
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. WHEN IS MEMBER STATE ACTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EU LAW?
- 2.1. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW AND MEMBER STATE ACTION
- 2.2. ARTICLE 18 TFEU IN GENERAL
- 2.3. ARTICLE 18 TFEU MARRIED TO EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
- 2.3.1. Personal Scope
- 2.3.2. Material Scope
- 2.4. FREE MOVEMENT
- 2.4.1. Four Freedoms in General: The 'Economic Connotation'
- 2.4.2. The Restriction Approach in Free Movement Cases: Market Access as Leading Criterion
- 2.4.3. Broad Conception of What Constitutes An Obstacle or Restriction
- 2.4.4. Justification: A Trompe-L'oeil Escape?
- 2.4.5. The Fifth Freedom? towards a Restriction Approach in Citizenship Cases
- 2.5. THE COMPETITION RULES
- 2.5.1. The Scope of the Competition Rules and the Concept of Economic Activity
- 2.5.2. The Restriction/Justification Approach in Competition Cases
- 3. THE EFFECTS OF BRINGING MEMBER STATE ACTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EU LAW AND THE PRINCIPLE OF ATTRIBUTED POWERS
- 3.1. TRIGGERING A LEGAL BASIS
- 3.2. SHIFT FROM NEGATIVE TO POSITIVE INTERVENTION
- 3.3. ECJ: EXTENDING THE REACH OF EU LAW
- 4. A BRIEF ASSESSMENT
- Chapter 13 Eurojust II: Un tiens vaut mieux que deux tu l'auras?
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. THE STATUS AND POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTORS THROUGH EUROJUST
- 2.1. STATUS AND POWERS OF NATIONAL MEMBERS IN THE EUROJUST DECISION
- 2.1.1. National Members' Status in the Eurojust Decision
- 2.1.2. National Members' Powers in the Eurojust Decision
- 2.2. STATUS AND POWERS OF NATIONAL MEMBERS IN THE AMENDED EUROJUST DECISION
- 2.2.1. National Members' Status in the Amended Eurojust Decision
- 2.2.2. National Members' Powers in the Amended Eurojust Decision
- 3. ANALYSIS OF LEGALITY IN THE AMENDED EUROJUST DECISION
- 3.1. THE LEGAL BASIS AND THE CHOICE FOR THE INSTRUMENT TO STRENGTHEN EUROJUST
- 3.2. SAFEGUARDING THE LEGITIMATION FUNCTION IN THE AMENDED EUROJUST DECISION
- 3.2.1. Role of Representative Institutions in the Decision to Strengthen Eurojust
- 3.2.2. Independent Actors' Involvement in the Decision to Strengthen Eurojust
- 3.3. SAFEGUARDING THE REGULATORY FUNCTION IN THE AMENDED EUROJUST DECISION
- 3.3.1. Appraisal of the Quality of the Amended Decision
- 3.3.2. Effects of the Decision in the Member States
- 4. STRENGTHENING EUROJUST AFTER LISBON
- 5. CONCLUSION
- Chapter 14 Legality and Data Protection Law: The Forgotten Purpose of Purpose Limitation
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. SHORT INTRODUCTION TO DATA PROTECTION LAW
- 2.1. DEVELOPMENT OF DATA PROTECTION LAW
- 2.2. OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES OF DATA PROTECTION LAW
- 3. THE PRINCIPLE OF PURPOSE LIMITATION
- 3.1. GENERAL
- 3.2. BAN ON AIMLESS DATA COLLECTION
- 3.3. LEGITIMACY
- 3.4. PURPOSE SPECIFICATION: TRANSPARENCY OF DATA PROCESSING
- 3.5. USE OR DISCLOSURE LIMITATION: INFORMATIONAL DIVISION OF POWERS
- 3.6. TIME LIMITS
- 4. MULTIPLE LEGAL ORDERS WITHIN THE EU: STRENGTHENING PURPOSE LIMITATION OR ENCOURAGING FUNCTION CREEP?
- 5. SETTING STANDARDS: THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE ECJ
- 5.1. ECTHR AND ARTICLE 8 ECHR
- 5.1.1. Purpose Specification or Transparency of Data Processing
- 5.1.2. Limitation of Powers and Time Limits
- 5.2. ECJ AND EC DIRECTIVE 95/46
- 5.2.1. Rechnungshof v. Österreichischer Rundfunk: Broad Interpretation of Data Protection
- 5.2.2. Huber v. Germany: Linking Purpose Limitation to Non-Discrimination
- 6. RESTORING THE PRINCIPLE OF PURPOSE LIMITATION: APPLYING THE FUNCTIONS OF LEGALITY
- 6.1. LEGITIMACY
- 6.2. ATTRIBUTION
- 6.3. REGULATION
- 7. CONCLUSION
- Chapter 15 Conclusion: The Eclipse of Legality: An Assessment
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 2. WHO ATTRIBUTES AND REGULATES THE EXERCISE OF PUBLIC POWER OVER CITIZENS?
- 3. THE QUALITY OF LEGISLATION: WHAT QUALIFIES AS LEGISLATION?
- 4. DEMOCRACY AND ITS ALTERNATIVES
- EXPERTISE AND SOCIETY
- 5. AN ASSESSMENT
- Table of Cases
- Back Cover
System requirements
File format: PDF
Copy-Protection: Adobe-DRM (Digital Rights Management)
System requirements:
- Computer (Windows; MacOS X; Linux): Install the free reader Adobe Digital Editions prior to download (see eBook Help).
- Tablet/smartphone (Android; iOS): Install the free app Adobe Digital Editions or the app PocketBook before downloading (see eBook Help).
- E-reader: Bookeen, Kobo, Pocketbook, Sony, Tolino and many more (only limited: Kindle).
The file format PDF always displays a book page identically on any hardware. This makes PDF suitable for complex layouts such as those used in textbooks and reference books (images, tables, columns, footnotes). Unfortunately, on the small screens of e-readers or smartphones, PDFs are rather annoying, requiring too much scrolling.
This eBook uses Adobe-DRM, a „hard” copy protection. If the necessary requirements are not met, unfortunately you will not be able to open the eBook. You will therefore need to prepare your reading hardware before downloading.
Please note: We strongly recommend that you authorise using your personal Adobe ID after installation of any reading software.
For more information, see our eBook Help page.