Return to Judgement

Reviews / Votes

'At work, do you feel encompassed by rules, regulations, by digital disciplining that seems pointless, by being advised to conform to standards, procedures, policies, rubrics and much else that seem to be systematic traps for ensnaring your time and diminishing your autonomy as a person? You're not alone. Alvesson and Normark have written a book that demonstrates this clearly. The existential state they describe is one in which there is an excess of "post-infantilized management" treating knowledgeable and capable adults as if dim-witted children. Kant prefigured enlightenment as liberation from the deadweight of pointless traditions and rituals; today careers are generated in creating increasingly more "modern" rituals of unfreedom from which only our minds, ourselves, can liberate us, by thinking thoughtfully, cultivating maturity and taking responsibility in organizations designed to encourage rather than diminish these features of being a competent person.' Stewart Clegg, University of Sydney 'On a scientific basis, the authors challenge many of the obvious assumptions that characterize today's leadership training. They question simplified models, trendy management concepts and overly positive rhetoric - and instead point to the need for judgment, maturity and critical thinking. Otherwise, there is a risk that organizations will be characterized by empty rhetoric, excessive administration and symbolic politics.





For those who work with leadership, governance or organizational development, this book offers an intellectually sharp and thought-provoking critique. Read and reflect.' Paer Boman, Chairman of Volvo and Handelsbanken 'The book addresses and analyses an important and timely issue: the growing bureaucracy and the increasing legal requirements faced by both public and private organizations. This results in a rising overhead burden that the core operations are forced to carry unless effective countermeasures are implemented. The analysis presented here is therefore highly insightful, and the proposals put forward are both valuable and well chosen - for example, making leadership less all-encompassing and more focused on specific needs.' Per Eriksson, former Vice-Chancellor, Lund University