Close Air Support and Interdiction

This study analyzes the use of airpower against enemy ground forces. The author assesses current doctrinal definitions of the Close Air Support and Interdiction missions as seen by the Air Force and Army, comparing and contrasting the two. The essence of both services' views are very similar, the greatest differences seem to be simple semantics. Next, the writer examines a typical modern field army, analyzing the various parts of combat and support forces for criticality and vulnerability to air attack. The longest section of the study then examines the desired operational effects and tactical results. This includes the questions of enemy actions, congruence with overall strategy, and the tactical problem of finding, identifying, striking, and assessing damage to, the target. Operational level combat assessment is also discussed. The author then examines the historical development of combined arms warfare, and current Army doctrine regarding forms of maneuver, attack, and defense, highlighting areas where a particular ground scheme of maneuver is best supported by a particular air mission, or by air attack on a specific target set. The next chapter briefly reviews four case studies in attack aviation, ranging from World War One to the Vietnam War.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.