The Controversy Over Capitalism

Reviews / Votes

Walicki's sophisticated and perceptive analysis reveals the structure of Populist patterns of thought and sheds welcome light on the intellectual presuppositions and philosophical implications of such basic notions as Mikhailovskii's idea of progress or Tkachev's activism. -Marc Raeff, Columbia University

Walicki draws a number of important conclusions concerning the meaning and significance of Russian populism: the apparent peculiarities of populism correspond, in fact, to those of a developing rural state, such as Russia, peculiarities which are typical of "all the backward countries in the process of modernization"; Populists were the first to postulate the noncapitalist industrial development of a backward agrarian country; in carrying out this historical mission, classical populism "was not only defined, and not merely influenced, but, in a sense, called into being by Marxism"; and populism, in turn, influenced Marx and the reception of Marxism both in Russia and, by extension, in the whole eveloping rural world.-Slavic Review

"The rich and important issue of the mutual relationship between Marxist and Populist theories of the socio-economic development of the so-catted 'peripheral countries' has still not been sufficierltly explored. The present study, although dealing only with nineteenth-century Russia, can, I hope, serve as one of the legitimate preliminary approaches to this large and topical treme." -Andrzej Walicki, from the new preface