The War on Modern Science

"The War on Modern Science: A Short History of the Fundamental Attacks on Evolution and Modernism" is a seminal examination of the cultural and legal battles that defined the early 20th-century conflict between religious fundamentalism and scientific progress. Maynard Shipley provides an incisive account of the organized efforts to suppress the teaching of evolution and the broader tenets of modern science in the United States.

The work details the rise of anti-evolution movements, the legislative challenges to academic freedom, and the ideological clashes that characterized the era. Shipley explores how traditionalist factions sought to insulate society from the perceived threats of "modernism" by targeting educational institutions and scientific inquiry. By documenting these fundamentalist attacks, the author highlights the complex relationship between faith and reason during a period of rapid social change.

This historical survey serves as a vital document for understanding the roots of creationism and the enduring debate over the role of science in public life. It offers a unique perspective on the struggle for intellectual liberty and the preservation of empirical truth against institutional opposition.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.